PC 77-60RcSOLUTION N0. PL77-60
A RESQLUTION UF THE ANAHEIN L.!TY PLANNING CONH15S10~~ TN~T
PETITION FOR RECLASSIfiCATION NA. 7b-77~3a BE APPRGUEO.
NFlEREAS, the Anahelm Clty Planning Commission dld recefve e ver{fp~d Peitfon
for R~classlficatlon from MICHAEL F. AN~ MARY N. DEMEO, 1876 '~. Ora~ge ~~enue,
Anahetm, Galifornla 92804 (Owncrs); EMFak~D ENGINEERING, 417 Nain StreeL, Huntington
Beach, Californla 92648 (Agent) of cerYaln ~r_at pr~perty sltuaLEd In th~ Ctty ofi'
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California deecrlbed as:
That portfon of [he Northwes[ qu~rter of the Southea~t quarter of Seetion 17,
Townshfp 4 South, Ranyc i0 Wesi, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, dn tne City of
Anahelm, as thc sald SouCheast quarter oP said Secti~n 17 Is ?~dti~ted on a map
filed In book 22, page 25 of Fecords of Surveys in the offlcc oY the Countv
recorder of sald Lounty, more partlcularty desc.ribed as folloNS:
Beginning aL the Northwest corner of sald Northwest quarter of the Southeast
quarter; thence South 0° 00' QS" East, along the West line of sald Northwest
quar[er 1G5.51 feet; thence North 89~ 33' Ob" East, parallel wlth the North line
of said Northwest quarter, 142.88 feet; thence North ~~ 27' 00" West, 165.50 feet
to said North line; thence South 89° 33' 00" We~t along s~td ~~orth line f41.58
feet to Che polnt of beginning.
WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commisslon did h~dd a pWblic hearfng at the City
Hall in the City of Anahelm or Harch 14, 1977, et 1:3~ 4.n,, notice of sald public
hearing having been duly 91ven as requlred by lew and in accordance wlth the
provisions of the Anahelm Municlpal Code, Lhap2er 1E.43, to hear an6 consider
evidence far and agalnst sald proposed reclasslflcatian and to investlgatr and makr
findings and re~ommtndatlons in cannectlon therewlth; and
41HEREAS, said Commissfon, after due inspection, investfgaclon and study made
by ttself and in fts behalf, and after due consid~retion o` ail evidence and reports
offered nt said hcaring, does flnd and determine the ~ollowing facts:
1. That the petitloner proposes a reciassltlcatlon of zonlrig from the RS-
A-43,000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE to the RS-7200 (RESIDENTIAL, S~NGIE-fAMILY)
ZOi~E:
. The Anahelm General Plan deslgnates subJtct property for low-density
resid~entlal land uses.
3. Thet the proposed reclas~lficatlon of subJec[ prnperl:y ls necessary
and/or desirabie for the orderly end proper development of the ccxmuniky.
4, That the proposed reclassfficetlon a! eub)ect property doe9 properly
rel~te to the zones and thelr permitted ~~es locnlly eetaDllshed in cioee proxlmity
to s:~bJect property mnd to the zones end thelr permitted uecs yenernlly eetabllshed
throughout [he carmunity.
5. Thet no ona~ Indicated thelr preaence at sai~ public hearing in
oppositlon; and that no correspondence was rec~ived lre on,pa~l2llon to the subJect
Retitlon.
RF.50LUTION N0. PC77-60
E~~VIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINDINC: That the Ci[y of Anahelm Planning
Camisslon has reviawed the subJect pr~j,.ct, consisting of approximatcly 0.4 acre
loceted aL the southeast corner of Orange Avenue and Nu[wqod Street and further
described as 1876 Nest Orange Avenue, and does hereby recommend to the City Councll
of the Clty of Anah-_lm that a Nega;lvt Declaratlon from the re~ulrnments to prepare
an environmental impacL reporY be approved for the subJect proJect on the basis that
there b+ould be no significant indfvidual or cumulative adverse environmental impact
since simllar slrlgle-famlly reeldentlai development surrounds this property to the
north across Orange Avenue and to th~ east, sou[h, and to the Hest acro~s Nutwood
Street; that there will be no lndividual ot cumulative adverse impnct on the
envlronment due to the approval of this Negative Declaratlon ~ince thr~ Anaheim
General Plan designates subJect property for low-densfty res(dentfal land uses
commensurate with the proposal, and thc Initlal Study submitted by the petitioner
indlcates no signlficant adverse impact; and that the Negative Deciaration
substantlating the foregoing flndings ls on file In the 0`flce of the Planning
Departme~[ at Clty Hall.
NOU, THEaEFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm Clty Planni~g Commission
does hereby recortmend to the Clty Cour•cil of the tity of P.naheim that subJec[
Pe[Ition for Reclassf,'ica[lon be approvtd and, by so dofng, [hat Tftle 18-7.onin~ of
the Anahelm Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-descrlbed pro~erty from
thz RS-A-43,000 (RESIbFNTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) 20NE and to incorporate said described
property Into [he RS-7200 (RESID~NTIAL, SIt~;LE-FAMILY) 20NE u~on the following
condltlon~ which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequlsitr_ co the propo~ed usr
of subJcct property In order to preierve Lhe safety end gencral welfare of the
Cltizens of the City of Anahelm:
1. That street liqhting facllltles along Nutwood Street and Ora~ge Av~enue
shall be Ins[alled as requlred by the Olrector of Public Utili[ies, and In acc' ~nce
wtth standard specificatfons on file in thr Office of the D'rector r. I'~ilic
Utilities; or that a bond, certificate of Aeposlt, letter of credit, ^' -.•i, ~n an
amaunt ar.d form s~tisfactory to the Clty of Anahelm shall be posted ~~!th i~tie City to
guarantee the instailation of the above-mentlone~ requlrements.
2. That the owner(sj of subJect property shall pay to the Cl;y of Anahelm
[he sum of sixty cen[s (60~) pcr front fcot a?o~g Ornnge Avenue qor trct plantlnq
purposes.
3. In the event thak subJec.t property Is to be dlvided for the purpose of
sale, leace, or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved division of subJect
property shall be submltted to and approved by the City of Anahelm and then be
recorded in the offlce of the Orange County Recorder.
4. Tha[ the owncr or subJcct property shall pey to the Lity of Anahelm the
appropriate park end recreatlon ln-lieu fees as determined [o be approprlate by the
City Councll, ,eld fces to be peld et the tlme the bullding permlt ls issued.
5. Prlor to the Introductlon of en ordinance rezoning subJect property,
Conditlon Nos. 1 and 1., above-mentloned, shall be completed. Thc provtslons or
righ[s granted by this resolution shall become null and vold by actlon of the City
Council unless sald condltlons are complfed wlth wtthin one year from the date
hereof, or such further time as the Cfty Cour.cil may grant.
-2- RESOLUTION N0. PC77-60
THE FORE601NG RESOLUTION is signed and approve by me this 14th day of
~~Chv ~977•
CHAlR N AN H~ t Y PLANNING COHMISSION
A5'TEST:
~~~~~ ~~~~~
E~ EyFA EM ORE
ANAHEIM CITY PLANkING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFQRNIA )
COUNTY OF OQ{~HGE )ss.
CITY OF ANANEIH )
I, Pamela H. Santala, Secretery Pro Tempore of the Anaheim City Planning
Commisslon. do hereby cert(fy [hat the fcregoing resolutlon Has passed and adopted at
a meeting of the Anahelm City Planning Commissfon, held on March 14, 1977, at 1:30
p.m., by the follorring vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, DAVID, HERBST, KING~ HORLEY~ TOLAR, JOHNSON
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NON~
IN NITN~SS 11HEREOF, i have hereun[o set my hend thls 14th ~sy of March, 1977
3~ M RE~i`'•rf~G~.Gf~~
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMHISSION
-3- RESOLlf740N N0, PC77-60