PC 77-94~i
'~
RESOLUTIOt~ N0. PC77-?~
RESOLUTION OF THL AIIAHEIM CITY PLAt~NII~G COHI11S5101~
1'~IAT PET I T 101! FOR VAR IAtICE N0. 2927 BE GRAF~?ED
WHEREAS, the Anahein City Planning Commission did receive a vcrified
Petitian for Variance from MIRA-~.Ot1~; ASSOLIAT[S, );U South Placentia Avenue, Sufte A,
Placentia, Galifornia 92L70 (Owner) and E.U.I. REALTY, IIIL., 12900 Garden Grove
Boulevard, r~116, Garden Grove, Lalifornia 92G43 (Agen[i of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of O~ange, State of Califernia, c~escribed as:
Parcel 1
That portion of Lot 1 in EilucF: 1Q of the Golden Statc Tract as per
~1ap recorded i n Eiook h, Pages GG and G7 of M i scc 1 1 aneous Plaps , i n
the office of tne County Recor~er cf said County, [ogether with
that por[ion of Lo[ 11 , E31ocl; "f';' of the !;raerr_r Tract, as per tiap
recorded in E3ooi: i2, Pages b7 and i;ti of Miscellaneous ftecords, in
the office of the County Recorder af Los An~eles County,
Californiz,, described as beginning at the Southerly Terminus of
[he coursc haviny ~ lenath of 190.46 fcet anJ a bearing of North
65~ 00' 17" 41est as described in Parcel 1 or the deed to [he Statc
of Lalifornia recorded June 11, 19G4 in Gook 70&3, Page 49,
Official RccorJs, said poinC bcing also thc most Southcrly corner
of Parcel 1 of Rclinquishiuer,[ No. 5~7 recorded Au~ust 29, 195ti in
Uook o7UG, Page j of Q~fici3l Records, a radial to said point
oeiny ?Jorth 21~ 19' 31" East; thence along the Southeas[erly linc
of said parcel North 35° 2'L' ;2" Eas[, 280.3; feet; thence North
t~l° 51' 27" East, 193.95 fee[ to the most Easterly corner of said
parcel, safd point beiny on the Westerly line of Parcel 3 of
Rclinquishment No. 693, recorued July 2, 1~69 in Cook 9010, Page
tiyfS cf Official Records; thence along the boundary of said parcel
the following courscs and distances: South )3° 54' 0~+" Eas*_,
36.11 fee[, South 520 37' 47" [ast, 163.67 fee[, North 49° 20' 47"
East, (i0.00 fcet, North 2~° 40' 40" 41est, 168.67 fect, Ilorth 5°
02' 02" West, 38.ju feet, IJurtn 53° 25' 07" East, 11b.G2 feet,
North G2~ 31' 32" East, ~5i~.2o feet to thc rr~st Easterly corner of
said parcel and thc True Point of E3eginniny; thence South 5° 21'
31" West, 224.OS feeC [o the t~eyinning of a curve concave
Westcrly, having a radius of ~~J.00 feet, a radial to sa:~d point
bears South 34° 33' 29" East; thence Southcrly 90.07 feet along
said turve throuyh a cen[ral angie of 9° 33' 39", a radial to
5aid point bears Soutti 7~° 5)' S0" East; thence North 55° 08' 23"
Wes[, 90.5'L feet; thence S~u[h G9° Q7' 17" West, ~t1.25 feet to a
non-tangen[ curve concave Soutnwes[erly having a radius of 60.00
fc~t, a radial to said point bears ~~orth E3° 07' 17" Eas[; thence
Northw.esterly alony said curve through a central anyle of 34° 15
40" an arc distance of 3~.~;2 feet, a radial to said poink bears
North 34° 51' 37" Easi; thence P~orth 34° 51' 37" East, 20~.51
feet; thence dorth 2%° 2t;' 2i5" Wes[, j+G,3Z feet [o a point on said
bounJary af Parcel 3 which bears S~u[h 6.'O 31' 32" West, 35.96
feet from saiJ Tt~ue Point of Beginning; tt~cnce I~orth G2° 31' 32"
East, 35.96 feet to the True Point of 6eginniny; and
RESOLUTIOtJ N0. PC77-94
i
WH[REAS, the City Ptanning Commission did ho)d a public hearin3 at the City
Hall in the Cit~ of Anahein on April 2>, 1977, at 1:,~0 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by laar and in accordance with tfie
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, tv hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make finding~
and recommendaCions in connecti~n [herewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, i~vestigatiun and study made
by itself and in i[s behalf, and after due consideraCion of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does finu ar.d determine the following facts:
1. That thc petitioner proposes the following waivcr from the Anaheirn
Municipal Code, tt~ establisli a real estate office in the F1L (I~lDUSTRIAL, L!MITED)
ZOIIE:
SEC710P~ 18.61.U20 - Permitted uses. (Office use not permitted)
2, That tfie proposed use is here6y grantecl on the basis of the following
stipulations of the petitioner:
a. That the office will bc limited to industrial and comnercial real
estate sa~es only, with no residential re~l esta[e sales.
b. That the rloor area will consi;t oP a maximum of 625 square feet,
as proposed, with no provisions for future expansiun.
c, fnat the number of employee~ at this site will consist of a
maximum of three (3) salespersons and one (1) secretary.
3, That there arc excep[ional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do
not apply generally ta the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
4. Tliat the requested var•iance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial propc~'ty right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone, and denied to [he property in question.
5, That the requested varianc.e will not be materially de[rimental to the
public welfare or injurious [o [he propcrty or imFravements i~ such vicir.ity and zor.e
in which the property is locateJ.
6, That no onc indicG~ted their presence at said public hearing i~
oppasition; and that no correspandence was received in opposition to the subject
p..tl tion.
Et~V I RONI"EI~TAL I h1P/1CT F I I~Q I tIG : Tha t the D i re~:tor of the P lann f ng D•epartment
has determined that t e proposed act~vity falls within the definition of Sectl~n
3.01, Class 1, of the City of Analieim Guidelines to the Requirements for an
Environmental Impact Report anJ is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
requirement to file an EfR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RLSOLVEU that the Artaheim City Planning Commission
does hPreby grant subiect Peiition for Variance, upon the Fol!awing conditions which
are hereoy founJ to be a necessary prerequisite to thE proposed use of the subjeet
prciperty in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the
Citv o` Anaheim:
-2- R~SOLUTION IJO. Pc77-94
~
i
1. That appropriate watcr assess,ment fces, as determined by th~e•Dire~tor
of Public U[ilities, shall be paid [o the City of ~1nak~eirn prior to [he issuance ~f a
building permit.
2. That subjec[ proper[~ ~tiall be developed subscantially in acc:ordance
with plans and ,pecifications on fale with tF~c City o'F Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. t
th rougfi 3.
3. 71iat the proposed bus~iness shall 6c limited to industrial and
comanercial real estatc sales onty, as sti~ulatec! tn hy the petitioner.
4. Thai the office ~ross floar area shall consist of a maxinum of 625
square feet, as propuseJ, with no provisions for futurc expansion, as stipulated [o
by [he petitioner.
5. That the number of empl~~yees ~t this site shall consi:,[ oi~ a maximum oi
three (3) salespersons an~i onc (b) secre[ary, as stipulated Lo by tt~e ra[itioner.
TH[ FOREG01~lG RE50LUT10"! is signcd and approved by r~e this 25th day of
I, Patricia E3. Scanlan, Secretary of the Anahein City Pl~nning C~nrntssion,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolutior was ~passed a~d adopYed at a meeting
of the Anaheim City Planning Conunission lield on April 25~ 1977, at 1:30 p.m., by the
folla•ring vote of [he members thereo`:
AYES: COMI1ISSIQt1ER5: EiARtIES, DAVI~, IIERf35T, KItJG, TOLAR, JOHI~SON
I~UES: C!?.MMISSIONERS: NOWE
ABSEtlT: CUI1t11SS10!IERS: IIOtlE
VACANCY: Ot1E SEAT
1977.
ItJ WITN[S5 WIIEREUF~ I have hcreunto set my hand this 25th day of April,
~ ~~~li~Q~~~
~ E , u n ~ ~~~~<, ~i siora
-3- RESOLUTIOtv IJO. PC77-94
STATE OF CAIIFORtJIA )
COUNTY Of 0{tAt:GE ) ss.
GITY OF A1~NIEt1•I }