PC 77-95RESOLUTI0~7 f10. PC77-95
R[S~LUTIOW OF THE AI~IAHEIH CITY P4Af~NING CCMMISSION
T!!AT PETITIOt~ r0i; VAftIn.11CE N0. 292~' EiE. GRA~~TEO
WflEREAS, khe Anaheim City Planniny f,unmission did receivc a verified
Petition for tiariance frum JF,~tFS M. Af7U M11'~10'! R. i:EELER ANU JOHN 4J. AtiU Kd:RRY D.
KEELER, P. 0. Box 631, /'inaheim, California y2U05 (Ownersj and Ellf[t~E SEILHAtI, 1700
North Temple, •,~102, Anaheim, ~alifornia 92f;Db (Agent) oiF cerCai~ real property
situated in the Cit•~ of /#nahcim, County of Oran9e, State of California, describcd as:
That pos'tic~n of tfi~ Sou.he~st quarter of [he Sou[Eiwest quarter of
Sectinn 9, in Township 4 South, Range 10 llest, as sha~n on a rr,ap
recorded in book 71, page 7 of Nisc~llaneous Mapc, recr,rds of
Orange County, California, described as beginning at a point in
the center linc t~f the is0 rooi hioh~:ay as c~nveyed to the State of
Galifornia, by deed recor~ic~ January 17, 1935 in bool: 7L~i, pagc
3$Q of ~ffecial ftec~rds~ distant [hereon 3~0 ieet Eas[erly from
Lhe ~ntersectifln of said center line with the Wes2 line of the
SoutF~eass quarter of the 'Souttiw~st quarter of said Sec2ion ?, and
r~~nnin9 thence Easterly alonc said center line 100 'feet; the~ce
Northerly paralle~ witl~ thc 41est line oE said Souiheast quarter to
the Southvresterly line ~~f Lh~: land described as Parcel >, in the
notice af lis pendens, recordcd November 10, 1~~2 in 6ook 1170,
page Iti4 0'~ Officia! ~tecords; [hcnce Westerly along said
S~utha~estefly linc to a li~c whic~ is para9lcl hith the SJest li~e
of said Sot~*_hea.t c{uarter extenJiny thr~u~h tnc point of
beginniny; thence ~ouxherly aiong said last mentioned paral~e{
llne to the poini of beyinning; and
NHER~AS, the City P'lannin~ Cormnission did hoiJ a public hcaring at the City
Hall 6n the City of Anaheir,i on April 2~, Iy7J, at 1:30 P•m•, notice of said public
hearing having becn uuly given as rec~uired by law and in accoruance with the
provisions of the Rnaheim Municipal CoJe, Cha~+ter 13.0;, to hear and consider
evidence for and a,yainst saiL proposed variance and [o inves[igate and make findings
and recormendations in cannectiun therewitli; ,jnd
tiJHERC~4S, sai~i Gommiss+on, aftcr clue insp~ction, investiyation and study made
by itself and in uts b:.half, and afier due consideration of ali evidence and reports
r~ffereu at said hearing, does find ~and determine the following facts:
1, Th~t [he peC':ioner propases Che fcllowirg waivu~r from [he Anaheim
t1unicipal Code~. [o establish an automotiu~: pain[in, Tacili[y in the CG (COMMERCIAL,
GEIIERAL) ZOIIE :
SEC710t1 lki.4y.02Q - Permitted uses. (Auto painting not permitted)
2, T~iat [he proposed use ~,s hereby granted for a period of three ~3)
years, subject to review an~ c~onsideration for possible time extensions, said review
period being in order to determine wh,eti~er thc proposed use has bee~ de[rimental to
surr•ounding land uses.
RESOLU710t~ N0. PC77-95
3, That Lhe petitia:~er stipulated to submitting a cU~rrent and correct
parkiny plan for tt~c subject property, said plan to denonstrace [Mat the parking is
in compliance with Code requireincnts an~ does not require the backd~g out of vehi_les
onto Hanchestcr A~venue.
4. That ihe petitioner stipulated tha[ the propos~d use wouid consist
prirr.3rily uf thc p.aintinc of vsns{ w~ith [he majority of td~e busiress beir,y secured
from rar dcalcrships; anu That [he floor area of thP business ~•~nuld not be expanc~ed
but hould remain as specificd on the submittad plans.
~. Tha~[ there are excep2iunal or exlraordinary circumstances or coneiitions
applicable to the proper~ty involved or to ihe intended use of the ~roperty that do
not apply g~enerally to the propcrty or class of use in tne samc vici~~ity and zone.
G. That the requested variance is necessary for ihe preservation and
enjaymen[ o` a subs[a~cial propcrty ric~hi pa55e55ed by o[her proper[y in the same
vici.nity ~nd zone, and denled co the propcrty in qi~estian.
/. That the requestc:d variance a+iil not b~ matcrially dctrinentai t~ the
peblic welfarc or injurious [o thc propcrty or inpsoverr~nts in such vicinity and zo~e
in which tlie property is loca[ed.
8. That na one inJicated their s~resence at said public hearin9 in
oppositivn; ond Lhat n~ ecrre5pondcnce was rc~ceive~l in 'opposition to the subjeFi
petltion.
F:1IVIROilMENTK~ i?'.PACT Fa11JI~iG: That 2he Director of [he Planning Department
has determ ned thaC the prupused activity falls 1J'ICfllfl the de`inition of Section
3,01, Llass 1, afi the Cicy of Anahci~l Guidelines tu the Requirr_nnents for an
EnvironnenYal ~mpact Repar[ and is, [hcrefore, c.a[ege~rically exen;pt from the
requirement to file an EIR.
NCW, T{{CRCFOkL, UE 1'i RESOLVEU that thc Anahcim Li[y Planning Comnission
does hereby ;rant subject Petition for Vari~nce, upon the following concNitions which
are hereby found to be a nec~ssary prerequisite to [h~ proposed use of the subject
property in ordcr to prescrvc tiic safeey anJ y~neral well~arc of [hc CiKhzens ~f the
City of Anahcim:
1. That sidewall;s sh~i! be installed as rcyuired by [i~e City Engineer and
in accordar~ce with s[andard plans ~~nJ specifica[ions on fil~e in the 9ffice of the
Lity Engineer.
2. 7tiat tras,~ stvraye areas siial! be provTded in accordance with approvr.d
plans on Filc wi[h the Office of the Direc[or of Pubtic blorks.
3, That appropriate water as5c:fsment fe.es, as determined by the Directo,r
of Public Utilities, shall be paid to [he Ci[y of Anaheim prlor to the issuance of a
buildiny perrnit.
4. That an "up-io-~late" parking plan, indicat~nc~ ChaL ttie existing on-site
parking is in compliance with Cadc ~requir~ments, shall Ue fiteJ with the Planning
Uepartment for review and approval, as stipulated [o bY the ~ctitioncr.
y. That subject proper[y sF~ail be de:veloped subsL~ntially in aGCOrdance
with plans and spccifica~ians on tile wi[h [he City of Anahcim marked Exhibit N~. 1.
_Z- RESOLllTION N~. PC77-95
6. That Conditi~n t~os~ 1, 2, 4 and 5, above-m~n~io~~d, shall be comp]'ied
with p~Tpr tc final building and zoni~g inspections.
7. Th:yi this var~ancc shall be grantc,.l f~r a Feriocl of ih,ree {3) years,
subjeeY to review and cunsideraxion by th~ Planni.o~ Com ission for possibie tim~e
extensions, upon e~ritten request by t}~e petitioncr.
THE FOF;EG~II~G RESOL.UTtnf~ is signed and appr~oved 5y r~e ~:fi+s 25th day of
Aprii, a977.
~ `m'`~
CIIAI Rf4A1~ , ANA M C I TX P~ANt~'I,IJG CON111 SS I Ot~
ATTEST:
U~~~~~
SL~:RETARY, AiIANEIM'CITY PI.ANNIJ~G ~Oi•iMISSt•'3H
STATE OF CAL I FORIJ I A}
COUt~TY OF ORAI~GE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHE111 )
(, Patricia [t. Sw nlan, Secretary of the !'~naheim Lity Planning Comnhssion,
do hereby certify that thc foreguin~ r~sol~~tion w~s passed and adopted at a meeting
of [hc Anaheim City Plann~ny Commi~sian held un April 2~, 1°77, at 1:30 P.m., b•{ [he
follo~aing vote of tl~c members tl~ereof:
AY~S: COM~MI5SIONERS: BP~Rl~ES~ Di1V~ID~ NERB$T~ Y.i11G~ TOLAR~ JOH+IS011
PIOES: C011htI551Gi~ERS: tlOI~E
AE~SEI~T: COM1115SlONEP,S: t~OtJE
UACANCY: OiJE SEi.T
1977.
IN WITI~[SS Ut~th,ktJF, 1 havc hereunto set my hand this ~>th day of Aprii,
/.1.~~c.~.aJ/3. ~~~~t-v~.~
S[CRETARY, Af1ANEIM LITY PLAt~N11JG C011kf5510N
-3- RESOLUTIOti ta0. PC77-95