PC 78-10RESOLUTION N0. PC73-iQ
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIN CITY PLA4HItl~ COMNISSIOtI
THAT PET 1 T 1011 FOR RELLASS 1 F I CAT 10~! t10. 77-73-35 BE GP,AtITED.
WHEREAS. the Anahcim City Planning Commission did receive a vertfEed
petition for Reciassification from DANIEL H. NINBIIRG A4D nn~7~N~CC~-LINDBQpG IX-XX,
15~~15 Sunset 8oulevard, Pacific Palisodes, Lalifornia , owners, and DAVID D.
DAHL AN~ GENE J, MARifIP.CCI, 17?_~ Pacific Coast Nighway. Huntinqton Beach. California
92648, anents. of cert~in real prooerty situated in thc City of Anaheim, County of
Orange~ State of California, described as fnllows:
THAT PORTIOtI OF LOT 4 OF SOUTH PLALE~~TIA TRACT N0. 7., AS PER HAP
RECO"DED 111 BOOY. 5 P~~E 4Z OF NISCEILANE0U5 MIIPS. IN TIIE OFFICE OF
TNE LOUt~TY RECOP.DER OF SAID COUiITY, DESCP.IBED AS FOLLONS:
BEGINNIN~ AT A POINT ON TIIE WEST LIHE OF SAID LOT, -IOPTH 47E.25
FEEY FROM THE SOU7Hl1EST CORN£R OF SAID LOT; THEtJLE ~IOR7HE°,LY
120.OQ FEET ALOt~G SAID WEST LINE; TNFNCE EASTE.°.LY PAP,PLLF.L WITH
TII: 40RTH LINE OF SAID LOT TO A POINT EASTERLY 215.00 FEET,
MEASURED ALO~~G SAID PARALLEL LINE FRON TiiF CENTEP. LINE Of CYPRESS
AVE!IUE; THEkCE SOU7HERLY 120.00 FEFT PARALLEL NITH THE IJEST Li~~E
OF SA10 LOT; TNEtlCE 11ESTERLY PABAILEL WITH THE NORTHERLY LINF OF
SAI~ LO7 70 THE POIkT ~F £E~lY!!lNS.
TttE ~IORTHERLY 120 FEET '!"tEASUf~E^ ALOttr, TtfE uESTEPLY LI~JE" Of TNAT
PO4T I Ot7 Of LOT 4 OF SOUTH PLACEtJT IA TP.ACT 110. 2, AS SNO~~ OtI A
HAP RECORDED IfI (i00Y, 5 PAGE 42 OF NISLELL4t~F~US HAPS. IN THE
OFFICE OF 7HE COUtlTY RECORDER OF SA10 COUtlTY, DESCRIRED AS
fOLL0~5: BEG11J!lING AT TNE SOUTNWEST CORNEP, OP SAI~ LOT 4; THE~lCF.
NORTHERLY 5^p.25 FEET ALONG 7NE WES7 LltlE OF SAID LOT; THENCE
EASTEP.LY PARALIEL WITH THE HORTN LIt~E OF SAID LQ7 TO A P0111T WFIICH
IS DISTANT 3t~~.00 FEET EASTERLY, MEASURED ALONG sain PA?ALLEL LINE
A:`:~ TNE EYT~NS!?4 Tucer~F~ ~nnu 7s!c zFNTf° LINF OF CYPRF55 AI~ENUE:
TNENCF SQUTHERLY PARALLEL 11ITIi THE b1E57 LINE OF SAID LOT 4 TO THE
SOUTHF.ASTERLY LIpE OF SAID LOT; THENCE 50UTNNESTERLY AL~FIG SA~D
SOUTHE~ISTERLY LINE TO THE TO Tf1E SOUTN LI~IE OF SAIp LOT; THE~~CE
'dESTERLY ~5.90 FEET ALONG SAI~] SOUTh LI'IE TO THE FOINT OF
BEGI~JNR1r,. EXCEPTi~!G THEREF?~M THAT PORTIOrt LYI~I~ WESTEaLY OF A
LINE PARALLEL t1~Tfl TtiE EASTERLY 215.~~ FEET FRON, SAID LE`ITEa. IINE
OF CYPRESS AVEMUE.
WFIEREP.S, the City Planning Cammisston did hold a pubiic hearing at the City
Hall in the City of An~hein on January tE, 1~7~~ at 1:3'~ p.m,~ notice of sald public
hearTng having been duly given as revuired by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anahein Municipal Code, Chapter 18.~3, to hear and consider
evtdence for and against said proposed reclassificatlon and to investiaate and make
findings and reccxnmendations in connection therewith; and
NFIE3EA5, said CommissTon, after due l~spection, invcstigation and s[udy made
by itself and in its behalf~ and af;er Jue consideration of atl evidence and reports
offered ~t said hearin9~ does find an:~ determine the following facts:
4C78-1Q
-~>
:;~.
1. That thc petitioner proposes reclassificatien of subject proper[y from
the R5-A-43,C00 (Residential/Agricultural) and R'1-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family)
Zones to the RM-1200 (Residen[ial, MulCiple-Family) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan desi9nates subject property for
commercial-professional land uses.
3, That the proposed reclassifica[ion is hereby granted subject to
petitioner's stipulatton to relocate tlie trash enclosure area away from the existing
mobile home park [o the north in order that any potential dis[urbance to the mobile
home park residents be minimized,
l~, That although the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for
cam^~ercial pro`essional uses, a portion of the ~ranerty aras previously approved for
medium-density residential land uses and, fur[hermore, ad~acent property has been
developed with multiple-family residential land uses and a nobile home park a~d~
therefore, the proposal is compatible with the ad.jacent land uses.
5. That the proposed reclassification ef sub,iect oroperty is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper developnent of t~te ca.nmunity.
6. That the proposed reclassificatlon of sub.jec[ property does properly
relate to the zones and [heir permitted uses locally established in close proximity
to subject proper[y and to thc zones and their permitted uses aenerally es[ablished
throughout the community.
7. Tha[ tiie proposed reclassification of subject property requires the
dedication and improvement of abuttina s[reets in accordance with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increasc in traffic which will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
8. That no one indica[ed their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondance oras received in opposition to subJect
petition.
EI~VIP,OtlMENTAL IMPAGT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Cafrnission has
revfe~•ed subJect proposal to reciasstfy the zorting fron RS-A-ta3,00Q
(RESIDENTlAL/AGRICULTURAL) anc+ RM-1200 (RESIDENTI/1L, MULTIPLE-FA!11LY) to RM-1200
(REStD~~ITIAL, MULTIPL[-FAMILY) zone on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land
consisting of approximately 0.8 acre, having a frontage of approximately S20 fee[ on
the east side of S[ate College [ioul~vard, aoproximately ~t!~3 feet north of the
centerline of Placentia Avenue; and does hereby approve [he Negative Declaration from
the requiremen[ to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there
would be no significant individual or cumulaCive adverse environmental impact due to
the approval of tnis tJegative Oectaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates
the subject property for commercial-professional land uses commensurate with the
proposal; that the proposed use is compatiblc with land uses to [he east and west of
subject property; that the Initial 5[udy submitted by the petitioner indicates no
signiflcant individual or cumulative adverse environmental inpacts; and that the
Negative Deciaratio~ su6stantlating the foregoing findinas is on ftle in Che City of
Anaheim Planning Department.
~IObI~ TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE~ that the Anahcim Lity Planning Lortxnission
does hereby grant subject Petiti~n f~r Reclassification and, by so doingy that Title
1$-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
-2- PC78-t0
! ~,_ f
property from the RS-A-43,000 (RESIDEt~TIAt/AGRICULTUP.AL) and PM-1200 (RESIDENTIAL,
MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONES and to incorporate said described property i~to ihe RM-1200
(RESI~ENTIAL. MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE uport the following canditfons which are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order
to preserve the safety and general a~elfare of the Citizens of the Ci[y of Anaheim:
1. That the rn~ner(s) of subJec[ property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
[he sum of 6o cents per front foot along State College Boulevard for [ree planting
purposes.
2, That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public Works provided, however, that
such trash storage areas shall not be located immediately adjacent to the mobile home
park t~ the north but shall be setbaci: a minimum of five (5) feet from the common
property line.
3. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
detPrmined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencert:ent
of structural framing.
4. That subject Froperty shall be served by underground utili[tes.
5. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
6. That the owner of subJect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recreation in-lteu fees as determined to bc aporopriate by the
City Council, said fees to be pald at the [ime the building permit is issued.
7. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall submit a letter requesting
termina[ton of Conditional Use Permit tlo. 323•
B. Prior to the tntroduction of an ordinance rezontng subJec.i property,
Condition Nos. 1 and 7, above-mentioncd, shail be completed. The provisions or
rights granted by thts resolution shall become null and votd by action of the
Planning Commission unless said conditions are comptied with within one year from tfie
date hereof, or such furth~r [ime as the Planning Commission may grant.
9, That Condition Nos. 2, ~~ and 5, above-mentloned, shall be complied with
prior [o final buildtng and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 16th day of
January, 147~.
~C/>.~.?~ ~i' ~s~~-_
CHA1~'tMAN, ANAHE111 CIT PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~dC~.~. ~ ~ ~
SECRETARY, ~NAHEIM CITY FLA NING COMMIS510N
-3- PC78-lo
4, ~`
`-,1
STATE OF CALIFORPIIA )
COUNTY OF ORAWGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIr1 )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resalution was passed and adopted a[ a meeting of
the Anaheim Lity Planning Commission held On January 16, 1q78, at 1:30 p.m., by the
followin9 vote of the membcrs ihsreof:
AYES: CO'iMIS510NEf:5: BARNES~ DAVID, HEP.BST, JONNSQPl, KI~~G, TOL4R
NOES: COM!415510NER5: ~~OPIE
ABSENT: COMP115510NERS: L1~7N
IfJ WITNE55 WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my h~nd this 16th day of January,
197~.
`~,o~r1. ~(° 7~a1~,~.
SECRETAF , A!lAHEIN CITY PLANIIING COMF1tSSI0N
.y- PC78-10