PC 78-11~~ ;
R~so~urtor~ r~o. Pc7s->>
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLA~INING CONHISSI011
TNAT PETITIO~~ FOR RECLASSIfICATIOPJ N0. 77-78a37 4E GRAFlTEO.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from M.450HIC BUILDIPlG A550CIATIOFI OF AN/1HEIM, 1077
West Ball P,oad, Anaheim, California 928~2, owners and DAVID S. COLLINS, 1077 West
Ball Road, Anahcim, California 92802, agent, of certain reai property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Cal;fornia, described as foilows:
Lot 5 of the replat of Orchard Park Traci as shown on a map
thereof recorded in Baok 7, Page 6, Mtscellaneous Maps, records of
said Orange County: EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Westerly 769 ± feet
thereof; said distance being computed to the center line of Citron
Street. EXCEPTING THEREFRO!1 the Easteriy 253 * feet, said distance
being computed to the center line of Harbor Boulevard. The intent
of this description is to encompass all of Parcel 3 on the
tentative Parcel P1ap ~ahich has been prepared by Jay Panchall,
registered enaineer, dated December 20, 1977, and which has been
submitted for approval to the City of Anaheim.
WHEREAS, the City P1anning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in [he City of Anaheim on January lE, 1q78, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of tlie Anaheim Municipal Code, Lhapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reciassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommenda[tons fn connection therewlth; and
WFiEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investiaation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of ali evidence and reports
offered at said heartng, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from
the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone to the RH-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family}
Zonc. '
2. That the Anaheim General Plan desi9nates subJect for medlum-densi[y
residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification is hereby granted subJect to the
submittal of precise plans for review and approval by the City of Anaheim Planning
Commission.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subJect property is necessary
and/or destrable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
5. That the proposed r~classification of subject proparty does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity
to subJect propPr[y and to the zonas and thelr permitted uses generally established
[hroughout the community.
6. That the proposed reclassification af subJect property requires the
dedicatlon and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation
PC78-11
~ ;^~
~ _~
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
7, That no one indicated their presence at soid public hearinq in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposit'on to subjcct
petition.
EII+/1P.ONPIENTAL I?4PACT FII~DING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
review~d subject proposal to reclassify the zoning from CL (COMMERICA.L, LI`11TED) to
RM-1200 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAHILY) ZOt1E on a rectan9ularly-shaped parcel of land
conststing of approximately 1.1 acres, having a frontage of approximately 64 feet at
the east tcrninus of Provential Drivc; and does hereby approve the tvegative
Declaration form the requirement to prepare an environmen[al impact report on the
basis ihat there rrould be no significant individuat or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the aporoval of this Negative Declaration since the
Anaheim General Plan desi9naLes the subject property for medium-density residential
land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensftive environmen[al impacts are
involved in the proposal; that the proposal is compatible with surrounding uses to
the west anJ south; that the (nitial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no
significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and [hat the
Piegative Declaration substantiatinn the foregoing findings is on ffle in the City of
Anahcim Planning Department.
NOW, TH[REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahcim Ci[y Planning Lpmnission
does hereby grant subJec[ Peti[ion for Reclassification and, by so doinq, that Title
1?,-Znning of [he Anaheim Municipal Code be anended to exclude ti~e above-described
property from the CL (CO!1tiERLIAL, LItt1T[D) TOflE ~nd to incorporate said described
pronerty into the RN-1200 (RESIDENTIAL, MIILTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE upon the following
conclitions which are fiereby found to he a r.ecessary prereouisite to che proposed use
of subjec[ property in order to preserve [he safe[y and general wclfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the oo-mer(5) of subject prooer[y shall deed to the City oF Anaheim
a strip of land 32 feet in width from the centerline of [he street and a 50 foot
radius cul-de-sac along the proposed extension of Prove~cial Street.
2, Tha[ all engineering requirements of the Ci[y of Anaheim along the
proposed extension of Provential Street, including preparation of improvement plans
and installation of ali improvements such as curhs and gutters, sidewalks, street
grading and paving, drainaae facilities or other appurtenant work, shall be complied
with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance wi[h standard plans and
specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer; that street lighttn9
facilities along proposed extension of Provential Street shall be installed as
required by the Director of Public Utilities, and in accordance with standard
specifications on file in the Office of the Director of Public Utiltties; and/or that
a bond, certificate of deposit, letter c,f credit, or cash, in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
installation of the above-mentioned requirements.
3, That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
thc sum of 60 cents per front foot along the proposed extenston of Provential Street
for tree rlanting purposes.
4. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
5, That drainage of su6Ject property sh,:ll be dtsposed of in a manner
satisfactory tu the City Engineer.
-2- PC78-tt
. .~
~ ;~
~~ ,
6. That the owner of subject propcrty shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the
City Council, said fees to be paid at the time thc building permit is issued.
7. In the event tha[ subject property is to he divided for the purpose of
sate, lease, or financing, a parcei map, to record the approved divislon of subject
property shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be
recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
8. Prior to [he introduction of an ordinance rezoning sub.ject property,
Condition tJos. 1, 2, 3 and 7, above-mentioned, shall be completed. Thc provistons or
rights 9ranted by this resolution shall become nuti and void by action of the
Planning Commissfon unless sald conditions are complied with aiithin one year from the
date hercof, or such further time as the Planning Commission may gran[.
9. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, precise development
plans including site pians, floor plans, and elevations, shall be submi[ted to the
Planning Commission for revie~o and approval.
10. Thai Condition Nos. 1~ and 5, above-mentioned, shall 6e complied with
prior to final 6uilding and zoning inspec[tons.
TftE FOP,EGO~NR RESOLUTION is si9ned and aoproved by me this 16th day af
January, 1978.
~.~o%~,~~
CNAI..MAN, A,IAHEI`1 IT PL~NNIN(; CO~i!115510N
ATTFST:
~ ~ ,~ ~.~:,
SECRETARY, ANAHE IM C ITY PL/1tit~ I ~~G COMM I55 ION
STATE ~F CIiL I FO^N I A )
COUNTY OF ORA~IGE ) ss.
C ITY OF APIAHE IM )
t, Edith L, fiarris, 5ecretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolu[ton was ~assed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held o~ January ih, 1?78, at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the memhers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIdNERS: BARtiES, DAVID, HERBST, JOHMSON, Kit~r,, TOI,/1P.
NOES: CO!1MISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIOtJERS: LINN
it1 WITNESS WNEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand this ltith day of January,
1978.
~~ .r~,,~
SECRETARY, A~lAHEIM C~TY PLAtINItIG COMI1155lOPI
-3- PC78-11