PC 78-115RESOLliT1~N N0. PC7p-1i5
A RESOLUTION OF iHE ANNHEIM CITY PIAN~ItJG COMMISSION
THAT PET1710ti FOR RELLASSIFILATION N0. 77-78-b0 BE GRANTEU.
~~EREAS, the Ansheim Ltty Planninr, Ccrmission did receive a verified
petirlon for R.~classtfication from HUNTER'S PARADISE, INC., 2141 West La Palma
Avenue, Anaheim, Ca'ifornia 92801, owner, and HEATIt b RUSSELL DEVELOPNENT CO., 11584
Iris Avenue, Fountair~',alley, Catifornta j27b$, agent, of certatn reai property
cit«ated in the Lit/ of Anaficim, CQU~:iy of Oranye, Statc af California, described as
follows:
PARCEL t: The North 2Q5 feet oi the East 221.32 fect of the west
~`~2.55 feet of the N~rtheas[ quarter of the Northwest quarter of
the Northwcst quarter of 5~ctia~ Z4, Toamshtp 4 South, Range 11
Wsst, in the Rancho Los ~oyoces, tn the Ci~y ~t Anaheim, as shown
ur a map recorded in ~~~k 5), Page Ii, Niscellaneous Maps. Records
of said Orange County.
NNE"FAS. the ~ity Planning Cor:missian did hold a public hearing at the Ctty
Hall ir. t!~e City Q~ Nnaheim on June 5, 1978. at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance wiLh the
~rovlstons of the Anaheim Municipal Lode, ~hapter t8.03, to hear a~d consider
evidence for and against sald proposed reclassificatton and to investigate and make
~lndings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WNERENS, said Commission, after due inspection. inves[iga[ion and study made
by itseif and in its behalf~ and af[er due consideration of all evidence and reports
ofFere~ at said hearing, does find and determine [he followinq facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes rectassification of subject property from
Lhe RS-A-43,OOQ (P.esidential/Agricultural) Zone to the RM-1200 (Residentlai,
MulCiple-Famfly) 2one.
2. That [he A~aheim General Plan deaignates subJect property for low-
medium density resldential l:md use.
3. That the propo~ed reclassification is hercby granted subJect tn the
petitioner's stipulation to locate the proposed drtveway on Ball Road Tn a manner
which wilf not adversely (mpact left-turn traffic movement a[ the intersection ofi
Bail Road and Gaynon[ Drlve, said driveway location to be reviewed and approved by
the City Traffic En3ineer.
4. ihat Che proposed reclassification of subJect property is necessary
an~/~r Jaslrahle for the ordarty and proper development of che community.
5. 7hai che proposed reclasslfic~tion oT subJect property does property
rciate Lo '!ie zones :~nd their permitted uses localty established in close proximity
t~ .ubject propcrty and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
thrnughout the community.
~. That th~ proposed reclassification of subJect property requires the
dedication and improven~nt of abuttin~ sLreets tn accordance w(tf~ Ehe Circulation
PC78-tt5
Element of the General Plan, due to the ancicipated increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensifica[ton af land u~e.
7, That no one indicated their presence at satd public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opp~siYion to the subject
petition.
ENYIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINOING: Tha[ the Anaheim City Planning Comm(ssion has
revir.~ied the subJect proposal to reclassify the zoning fror.i RS-A-43,000 (Residentlal,
paricultural) to RM-1200 (Residential, Mul[iple-Fanily) on a rectangulsrly-shaped
parcel of land constscing of approxima[ely 0.7 acre having a frontage of
approximately 221 feet south siJe of Ball Road, being located approximately 876 feet
east of the centerline of Beach Boulevard; and does hereby approve the Negative
Declara[ion frcm the requiremeni to prepare an environmental impac[ repart on the
basis that there would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaratton since the
Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for low medium density
residental land uses commensurate with the proposai; tha[ no sensictve envirornnental
impacts are i~volved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submit[ed by the
peti:toner indicates no significant individuai or cumulative adverse environmenial
impacts; and [hat the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is
on file in thc City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, T-IEREFORE, 2E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Lt[y Planning Commisston
ooes hereby grant subjeci Pe[ition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
18-Zoning of the ~naheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from the RS-A-43,000 (RESIDEt~TIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and to incorporate said
described proper[y into the RN-1200 (RESIDEt1TIAl, MULTIPLE-FAriILY) ZONE upon the
foliowing condi[tons whicfi are hereby found [o be a necessary prarequtsite to the
proposed use af ~ubJect proper[y in order to preserve [he safe[y and general welfare
of the Citizens of [he City of Anaheim:
1, That the owner(s) of subject properiy shail deed to thc City of Anahetm
a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Ball Road
for street wideninq purposes.
2. ihat all engtneering requirements of the Ctty of Anaheim along Ball
Raad including preparation of improvement plans and installatton o` all improvements
such as curbs and gutters. sidewal~s, street grading and pavin9. drainage facilities
nr ~ther appurtenant work~ shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer
and in accordance with s[andard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the
City Engineer; tha[ street lighiing facilities atong Ball Road shall be installed
prlor to final building and zoni~g tnspections unless otherr+ise approved by the
Director of Public Utilities, and in accordance Ntth standard specifications on file
in [he Office of the D(rector of Public Utilities; and/or that a bond, certiftcate of
deposi[, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of
Anahelm shall bc posted wtth the Ci[y fo guarantee the installation of the above-
mentioned requirements.
3. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 95 cents per front foot alung Bal) Road for tree planting purposes.
4. That [rash storage areas shali be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with ihe Office of the Director af Public Norks.
-2- PC78-115
5, That fl~ hydrants shali be installec. ~3nd charged as required and
determined to be necess~ry by the Chief of the Fire Depzrtment prior to commencement
of structural framing.
6. That subJect property shall be served by underground utilities.
7, That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
8. That the proposed driveway on Ball Road shall be located In a manner
which will not adverset/ Impact left-turn traffic rwvements at the intersection of
Ball Road and Gaymont Drfve, satd driveway locatlon to be ~eviewed and approved by
the City Trafftc Er~gineer prlor to issuance of bullding permits.
9, Tha2 the owner of subjec[ propcrty shali pay to the CtCy of Anahelm the
appropriate park and recreation i~-Ileu fees as determined to be anoroaria[e by the
City Council, satd fees to be paid at [hc time the bullding permit ls issued.
10. Prior to the introduc[ton of an ordlnance rezoning subjec[ property,
Condition Nos. t, 2, and 3, above-mentioned, sfiall be completed. The provisions or
rlghts granted by this resolution shall become null and void by actton of the
Planning Commission unless sald conditions are complied with within one year from the
date hercof, or such further time as the Planning Canmission may grant.
11, That Condition Nos. 4, 6 and 7, abovc-mentioned, shall be cor.~plTed wtth
prior to final building and zoning inspectlons.
BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED [hai thc Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine tha[ adoption of this Resolution is expressly predlcated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditlons heretnabove set forth.
Should any such condi[ton, or any part thereof, Ae declared invalid or unenforceabie
by th,~ final judgment of any court of conpetent jurisdiction, then Shis Resolution~
and any approvals herein con[ained, shall be deemed null and void.
~9~s.
THE FOREGOIPIG RESOLUT101~ is s(gned and approved by me thls 5[h day of June
,~ 2
CHA I!1/~N, ANAFiE IH C I 4ANH IlIG LO"1M I SS ION
AT7E5T:
~d.~ ,~°_ ~~:
SELR[TARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANI~ING CONMIS510'~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORAMGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harrts. Sccretary of the Anaheim City Pla~ning Commission, do
hcreby certify that the forcgoing resolutton was passed and adoFtcd at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Ptanning Commtssion held on June 5, 19?8, at 1:30 p.m.. by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISStONERS: BARNES~ DAVID, HERBST, JOHNSON, KltlG, TOLAR
NOES: COHMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS; LINN, havTng not been present for entire hearing.
III WITNESS UH:REOF. I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of June, 1978.
~EL~'TAT~Y~NA~I'E"'I M~ ~ CO M I 55 I ON
-3- PC78-1t5