PC 78-12t_ r }
P.ESOLUTION N0. PC7~-12
A RESOWT I ON OF TUE ArtANE IM C I7Y PLAPRt I~Ir, C0~1~~ I55 I ON
THAT PETITION FOR COtlDITIONAL USE PER!11T N0. 17a° BE DEIIIED
WHERE.AS, the Anaheim City Plannin9 Comriission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditionai Use °ernii from KA•°•L A!10 Tf1EA A. KOLB, 140 ?into Place,
Norco, California, 917E0, ovrners, and CHARLES E. EAGLES, 423 t~orth Anaheim Boulevard,
Anaheim, California 92805, agent, of certain real property situated in thc City of
Anahein, County of Orange, S[ate of Caltfornia, described as:
LOT 3 OF TRACT 131 , BLOCY. A:lEST COURT AS PEP, NAP RECf1RDED IN BAOK
1 1, PAGE 32 OF M I SC[LLA~tE0U5 t1AP5 I ti THE OFF I CE OF TFI[ RECORDE". OF
SAID ORA.i1.r,E COU!lTY, EXCEPTItIG THE NORTHERLY ~ FEET THEP,EOF.
WNEREIIS, the City Planning Commission did schedule a public hearfny at the
City Hall in the City of Anahein on Decemh~r i°, 1~7?, at 1:3~ P•m., nottce of said
public hearing having been duly c~iven as required hy la~•r and in accordance with the
provisions of [he Anaheim Hunicipal Code, Lh~pter 18.0;, to hr_ar and cansider
evidence for and a~ainst said proposed conditiona) use anJ to investigate and make
findi~gs and reconmendations in connec[ion there~•~ith; said public hearing having been
continucd to the Plannina Co^mission meeting of January l~i, iQ?8; and
NNEREhS, said Canmission, after due inspection, invr_stigation and s[udy made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find a~d determine the followina facts:
1. That the proposed use is pronerly one for o~hich a cotiditional use
permit is autharized by Anahein Municipal Code Section 18.03.Q30.010 to wit: to
permit a rest home for alcoholics.
2. That the proposal is hereby denied on that basiS that the use would not
be compatible wi[h the surrounding residential uses in that [he proposed location is
in a wholiy residen[iat neighborhoad and that thcre :~bulcl be a petenLial increase En
traffic volume and the numher of parl:ed vehicles orhich rauld negatively impact the
residential character of [he area; and that the existin9 and proposed deveiopment of
this site is not adequate to accommodate the number of residents propased in terms of
the available bathroan facilities and the on-stte parking.
3. That the proposed use will adversely affect thc adloining land uses and
the 9rowth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
4. That the size a~d shape of the site proposed for the use is not
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the parttcular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5, That the granting of the Condtttonal Use Perm!t ti~rould be detrimentai to
the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6, That 19 persons indicated thefr presence tn opposition a[ the first
public hearing and 23 persons indicated their presence tn opnosition ac the second
PC78-12
~
public hearing; that 5 letters rrere received in opposition and petitions containing
approximately 135 signatures were presented in opposition to subJect petitfon.
ENVIRO~IMEfITAL IMPACT FItJDING: The Director of the Pianninq Department has
determined that the proposed actlvity alis o~tthin the definition of Section 3.01,
Class 1~ of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the Re4uirements for an Environmental
Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the reouirement to file an
EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOIFlG RESOLUTIOFI is signed and approved by me this 16th day of
January, 197II.
ATTEST:
~~~~~~~~
CH I!;J1nPl, AtiAHE 1!1 C ITY PLAfJW I tIG COh1M I SS ION
d~L ~ ~i~~~
SECRETARY, AlIANE IM C ITY PLAN`: I qf, CO'1'1155I Ot7
ST/1TE OF CALIFORfJfA )
LOUNif OF ORANrE ) ss.
CITY OF AtIAHElF1 )
1, Edith L. Narrts, Secretary af the Anahein City Planning Commission. do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolutlon was passed and adopted at a meeting of
t!te Ana`~ef^~ CFty P1annlnq Corxaission held or January ib, T~73, at i:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the memhers thereof:
AYES: COMM1551011ER5: BAR~~ES, DAVID, HERBST, JOHNSON, K11lG, LiNN, TOLAP,
NOES: COMMIS510lIERS: FIONE
ABSENT: CO!iMISSIO~IERS: NONE
IFJ WITItE55 47HEREOF~ I havc hereunto set my hand this 16th day of January,
1978.
~T.f ~ ~e~.,.~:.
SECRETARY, A~IAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMHISSION
`2- PC78-12