Loading...
PC 78-123`. RESOLUTION 40. PC7E-123 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CO}1HISSION AHENDING A COtiDITION FERTAINING TO PARTICIPATION IN THE COST OF TP.AFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION ADOPTED IN CONNECTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PEP.MIT N0. 1632. WHEREAS~ the petitioner submitted a request for dcletfon of a conditlon of approval contained in Planning Cortmission Resolution No. PC76-183 on property consisting of epproximately 32 acres located northeasterly of the intersectTon of Cerritos Avenue and Sunkist SLreet; and WHEREAS~ the petitioner requcsts deletion of the following condition co~tained in the above-referred-to resolutiort: . "13. That the owner(s) of the subject property shall participate in the costs of installing traffic signalization at the intersectlon of Sunkist Strcet and Cerritos Avenuc, said participation to be one-fourth of the to~al cost, as recorynended by the City Traffic Engineer." WHEREAS, the Anaheim Ctty Planning Lommission did hold a public hearTng at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on June 5, 1978. at 1:30 p.m.~ notice of said public hearing having been duty aiven as required by law and In accord.~nce with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider ~+Idence for and against said proposal to amend the conditions of approval of Condltional Use Permit No, 1632. and to investlgate and r.iake findings and recommendaiions in connection thcrcwtth; and NHEREAS~ said Commtssion, after due inspection, investlgation and stud; made by itself and in i[s behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports ofFered at said hearing. DOES HEREBY FIND: 1, Tha[ no one appeared at said pub~lt hearina in opposition to subJect request; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subJect request. 2, That the petitto~er posted a bond for the participation In the cost of the instatling the traffic stgnal; subsequentiy, however~ Ctty Council adopted Policy No. 214 pertaintng to Traffic Signal Assessment in cannectlon with ~ew constructlon. 3. That it would be more appropriate for the petittoner to pay the TraffTc Slgnal Assessment rather than to participate in [he cost of installing a specific traffic signai. NOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. that the Anahetm City Planning Lcrmiission does hereby grant the request for amendment to Condltion No. 13 of Condttional Use Permit No. 1632 to rcad as Follows: PC78-t23 ,~ "13. That the owncr(s) of subjcct property shall comply with Councl) Policy Nu, 214 (Traffic 5lgnal Assessment) p~ior to the release of the bond whtch has becn poste~ for Installation of a trafflc signal at Cerritos Avenue and Sunkist Street. BE 17 FURTHER RESO!VED that the Anaheim City Planning Lormn(ssion dces hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolutton Is expressiy predlcated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditlon~ or any par[ Chereof, be declared Tnvalld or unenforceable by the final Judgmant of any court of competent jurisdlction, then thls Resolution, and any approvals hereln contained, shall be deemed nutl and void. THE FdREG01FIG RESOLUTIOt~ is signed and approved by me chis 5th day of June 1978. ATTEST: y ~~~~ ~r1A1w1AN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~~r ,P ~J~~ SEGRE7ARY, NAHE(ti C TY PLANNINC~ H~TdN STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY Of ANAHEIN ) I. Edt[h L, Harrls, Secretary of the Anaheim CTty Planning Commisston, do hereby certify that the foregotng resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commtsslon he'~ on Ju~e 5, 1978. at 1:30 p,m.~ by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: LOHMISSIONERS: BARNES, DAVID, JOHNSON, KING~ LItJN. TOLAR NOES: LOMMISSIONERS: NONE ASSENT: LOMNISSIONERS: HERBST IM WITNE55 1JNEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of June~ 1978, ~a .~ . SECRETARY~ ANANEIH CITY PLANNINC COMMISSION -2- PC78-123