PC 78-124'~ 't
RESOLUTION N0. PC78-124
A RESOLUTION Of THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIN, COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDI710NAL USE PERf11T N0. 183~ BE GRANTEO
NHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Carmnisslon did receivc a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from MARRIOTT CORPORATION, 5161 River Road~
Washington, D. C. 20058 and ZABY'S LONVENTION NAY. INC., 444 West Kateila Avenue,
Anaheim, Galtfornfa 92802, owners, of certain real property situated in the City of
Anahe~m, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CAIIFORNIA. AS SHONh ON A PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 45 PAGE 30 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORD~R OF SAID COUNTY.
(deing the most easterly portion of the proper[y.)
PARCEL 1: The East 300 feet o` the North one-half of the North
one-half of the Southwes[ one-quartcr of thc Northwest one-quarter
of Sec[ion 27, Totimship 4 Sou[h, Range 10 I/est, partly in the
Ranch~ San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana and partly in the Rancho Las
Bolsas. as shorm on a ltap recorded in book 51. Dage 10 of
Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, Lalifornia; and
PARCEL 2: The East 300 feet of the South half of the North half
of the Southwest quar[er of thc Nor[hwest quarter of Sec[ton 27,
Township 4 South, Range 10 Nesc, partly in Rancho San Juan CaJon
de Santa Ana~ and partly in Rancho Las Bolsas, as shown on a Map
recorded in book 51, page 10, Miscellaneous Maps. records of
Orange County. ~California. (Being the most westerly portion of
the property.)
1lHEREAS, the C(ty rfanning Comm(ssion did hold a public hearing at the Ctty
Hall in [he City of Anahetm on June 5. 1979, a[ 1:30 p.m., not.ice of said pubilc
hearing having been duly given as requir~d by laa and ir. accordance wTth the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Lode, Chapter 13.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and to investTgate and make
ftndings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WFIEREAS, saTd Commission, after due Tnspection~ investigatlon and study made
by Itself and in Tts behalf~ and af[er due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing~ does find ana determine the followtng fects:
t. Tha[ the proposed use is properly one for ~ahtch a conditional use
permit is autho~ized by A~aheim Munlcipal Code Section 16.48.050.070 to wit: to
permit ~n 18-story hotel complex.
2. That the proposed use is hereby granted for an 18-story. 165-foot hlgh
ho[el complex. s:bJect to the petitioner's stTpulatlons that truck deliveries shall
be limited to thc dayli9ht hou~s only and to provlde a ten (10) foot high salid block
wall aiong the south property line except that adJaceni to a portion of Lot No. 29 of
Tract No. 3029, a six (6) foot high solid block wall topped wtth four (4) feet of
perforated-type decorative fencing shall be constructed ([o provide 6etter atr
ventilatio~ and circulatlon along the portion of Lot. No. 29 which abuts the
res{denital structure). Tfie specifSc plan for tfie f~ncing along tfie aforementioned
PC78-124
portion of Lot t~o. 29 shall be subJect to the approval of the Planning Department and
the City Engineer.
3. That the proposed use aili no[ adversciy affect thc ad)olning land uses
and the growth and development ofi the area in which lt is propused to be tocated
because a ten (10) foot high block wall wiil be constructed along the south property
llne to mitigate any potentiat adverse impact the hocel acti~oximatelY located in the
adjacent re•identlal uses and because the ho[el is app Y
commercial recreational area.
4. That the size and shape of the s(te proposed for the use ts adequate to
atlov+ the full developme~t of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
pareicular area nor to the peace, health, safety. and genera) welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Condttional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any~ will not be detrimental to the peace, health. safety and general
weifare of the Citlzens of the City of Anaheim.
6. Tha[ approximately ten (10) persons tndicated their presence at said
public hearing in op,osition; a~d that no correspondence was received in opposition
to the subJect pe[ition.
~NVIRONMEhTAL IMPAC7 FINOING: That EIR No. 21~ which was prepared in
conjunction w th ond t ona Use Permit No. 1834 to construct a i3-story~ iG5-foot
high hotel With associated facili[tes on the sou[h said of Convention Way between
Harbor Boulevard and Nest 5[reet, having been considered thts date by the City of
Anahcim Pla~ning Commission and evidcncc. both Written and oral, having been
presented to supplement drafe EfR No. 215, finds that potential signifTcant impacts
which could result from Lhe proposed proJec[ may be mltigated by configuratlon of the
site pian and reduced to an accepiable level by conformance with City pians. policies
and ordinances and draf[ EIR No. 215 is in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Acc and City and State E!R Guidelines; therefore, based upon
such information the Anaheim City Plannin9 Commission does certify EIR No. 215.
NOW~ TNEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby gran[ subject Petition for ConditTonal Use Permit. upon the following
condlttons which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the CTty of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anahelm
the sum of three and one-half doliars (53.5~) per front foot along Convention Way
for street lTghting purposes.
2. That [he own_r(s) of subJect propercy shall pay to the Cicy of Anaheim
the sum of 95 cents per front foot along Convention Way for trce planting purposes.
3, That [rash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file wiLh the Office of the Director of Public Works.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as requTred and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Ftre Department prior t~ commencement
of structural framing.
-2- PC78-124
~ ..
i. •
(: • ~ , i
5. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
6. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer, which manner may include the extension of dralnage
factlittes in Eugene Street as required to pratect that street from flooding.
7. In the event that subject property is to be divided for the purpose of
sale, tease, or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved divtsion of subject
property shall be submitted to and approved by the Ctty of Anaheim and then be
recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder,
8. That a modified cul-de-sac shall be provlded at the terminus of Eugene
Street subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
9. That Lhe developer shall reconstruct the median isiand in Conventton
Way as required by the City Engineer to provide for left turn pockets.
10. That this Condi[ional Use Permit ts grantnd subJect [o the completion
of Reclassification IVo. 66-67-61, now pending.
I1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
through 5; provided, however, that a six (6) foot high soltd biock wall topped wtth
four (4) feet of perforated-type fencing shall be constructed alo~g that portion of ~-
the south property line located ae~Jacent to the residential structure on Lot No. 29
of Tract No. 3029. The specific plan for the fenctna along the aforementioned
property line shall be submitted to and approved by [he Planning Departmeni and [he
City Engineer.
12, That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 7 and 10, above-me~tianed, shall be complied
with prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or
prior to the time tha[ the building permit (s Issued, ar withtn a period of one year
from date hereof, whichsver occurs first, or such further tlme as the Planning
Cnrtmisslon may grant.
13. That Condition t~os. 2, 5. 6, 8, 9 and 11, above-mentioned, shall be
complied with p;tor to fi~al buildtng and zoning Inspr.ctions.
14. That all tru~k deliveries shall be limited to the daylight hours only.
BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution ~s expr~ssly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditlons hereinabove set forth.
Should any such conditlon, or any part thereof~ be deciared invalid or unenforcea6le
by the final Judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any appr•ovals herein contained, shall be deemed nuli and vold.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION Is signed and approved by me this Sth day of June
1978.
~/i • ~h'r~r
CHAI MAN, ANAHEIM CIT~Y PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~ ~ ~.:,
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM LITY PIAHNING COMMISSION
-3- PC78-124
_ y .
~
' . (
a
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
LOUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planntng Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meetin9 of
the Anahelm City Planning Comnission held on June 5, 1973, at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, DAVID, HERBST, JOHP150N~ KING. LINN, TOLAR
NOES: COHMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COHt11SSI0NER5: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOP~ I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of June, 1978.
~/.~1. .~"'~ ~ 7, ~itit~c
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
'
I -4- PC78-t24
~