PC 78-139RESOLUTI01t N0. PC73-139
A RESOLUTION OF Tf1E ANAHEIM CITY PLANNI~IG COMMISSIO~~
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATIQN N0. 77-78-53 BE DE~~~ED,
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Clty Planning Commisslon did receive a verlfied
petition for Reclassifica[ton from TEXACO ANAHEIM HILLS, I~~C., 3°0 Anaheim Hills
Road, Anahcim. Latifornia 92807, ~+ner, and AN.4HEIM f11LL5. ItIL., 38~ Anaheim Hills
Road, Anaheim, California 92807, agent, of certain real property situated in tha Ci[y
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as foliows:
BEING A DIVIS~ON OF A PORTION OF THE LAND ALLOTTED TO PAULA
PERALTA DE OOHINpUEZ AS DESCRIBED Itl THE FINAL DECP,EE OF PARTITION
OF THE RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA AN.A WHICH NAS ENTERED SEPTEMBER
12, 1868 (N BOOK "B" PAGE 410 OF JUDGEMENTS Of THE DISTR~CT COURT
OF LOS ANGELES, APID A PORTION OF SECTION 12, TO~ItJSHIP 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 9 NEST~ SAN BERNARDlNO MERtDIAN IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
COUNTY OF ORANGE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING NI7HIN TP-700.
NNEREAS, the City Ptanning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Clty
Hall in the City of Anaheim on July 3, 1978. at 1:30 p.m.~ notice of said publtc
hearing having been duly given as required by laH and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municfpal Code. Lhapter if3,03. to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclasslfication and to inves[Iga[e and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewiLh; and
WHEREAS, said Comnission, after due inspec[ion, tnvestiaation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does ftnd and determine the followine facts:
1. That the petTtioner proposes reciassifica[ion of subject property from
the RS-A-43,000(SC) (Residential/Agricultural-Scenic Corridor Overlay) Zone to the
C!.(SC) (Cor~anercial, Limt[ed-Scenic Corr)dor Overlay) Zone.
2. That the Anahelm General Plan designates subJect property for general
commercfal land uses.
3. Tha[ the proposed reclassiflcation is hereby denied on the basis that
the additional traffic which would be generated by the "CL(SC)" Zone in comparison
with the "CO(SL)" Zone prevtously approved for [he property o+ould detrimentally
impact Anaheim Hills Road which in this spectfic area wtll primarily serve
residential uses to ~he south and tfiac [hc devclopmen; of addittonai limited
cor,mercial property in this specific area is premature.
4, That the proposed reclassification of subJect property ts not necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper dcvelopment of the comnunity.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subJect property does not
properly relate to the zones a~d their permitted uses locally established Tn close
PC7H-13g
. i.
proximity to subJect property and to the zones and thefr permitted uses generally
established throughout the community.
6. That 4 persons lndicatad their presence at said publlc hearing in
oppositTon; and that no correspondence was received in oppesitton to the subJect
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IHPALT FINDING: ThYt thc Anaheim CitY ~f~^~~9R5-~Am-435000(SC)
reviewed the p~oposa to rec assif the zonin9
(RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTUP.AL-SCEkIC CORR~DOR OVERLAY)to the Cl(SG) (CO!1t1ERCIAI, LIMITED-
SCEHIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY) on an irregularly-shapcd parccl of land consisting of
approximately 15.9 acres having a frontage of approximately 1640 feec on the south
side of t~ohl Ranch Road, having a maximum depth of approximatcly 650 feet, and being
located at the existing southerly terminus of Anaheim Hills Road; and does hereby
disapprove the Negative Dectaration fran the requirement to prepare an environmental
impact report on the basls that the proposal woUld have signiftcant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and chat additional t~affic would be
gcnerated onto a street whtch will primarily serve residenttal uses.
NOW~.TIiEREFORE,BE 17 RESOLVEU, that the Anaheim City PlannTng Commission
does hereby deny subject petition for reclasslficacion on the basis of the foregoing
findings,
TNE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and appr~ by me this 3rd day of Juiy
~978.
G IRMRN. IM CI PLA!INING COMNISSION
ATTFST:
~~,,,~. ,P ~~;~ .._~
SECRETAR , ANAHEIH C17Y PLANNING OH."115510N
~TATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIH )
I, Edith L. Harrls. Secrctary of the Anahelm CTty PlannTng Ca+misston, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resotution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim CTty Planning Commission hald on July 3. 1978~ at 1:30 p.m.~ by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES. DAVID~ HERBST, JOHNSOt~. KING, LINN~ TOLAR
NOES: CQNMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSEIdT: LOMNISSIONERS: NONE
~ IN W17NE55 WHEREOF~ 1 have hereunto set my hand thls 3rd day of July~ 1978.
~~ e1~t, .1.° fe~GC~t.~:...
SECRETARY~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMM~SSION
-2- PC78-t39