PC 78-145RESOLt1TI0N N0. PC78-145
RESOLUTION Of THE ANAHEIM LITY PLANNING COMM15510N
THAT PETIT10h FQR VARIANCE N0. 3023 BE GRANTEU
WHEREAS, the Anahelm City Pianning Commission did receive a verified
Petitlon for Variance fran EUCLID SHOPPING CErlTER, 2'293 West Ball Road~ Anahetm,
California 92804, owner, and FEDERAL SIGN COMPANY, 1100 No~'th Main Street. Los
Angeles, Callfornia 90012, agent, of certain real property situaied in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California described as:
Parcels 4 and 5 as shown on a Parcet Map recorded February 20,
i?70 in Book 27, Page 41 of Parcel Maps. County of Qrange, Siate
of Californta. Also 4nown as Portions of Lots 3 and 4 of
Townsends Subdivision, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange~
State of Caiifornia as shown on a map thereof, recorded in 9ook 5~
Page 40, Miscelianeous Maps, records of said County.
WHEREAS, the CTty Planning Canmiss(on did
Hatl in the City of Anaheim on July 3, ~978, ai i:30
hearing havirsg been duly gi~en as required by
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter
evidence for and against said proposed variance and
and reconmendatlons in connection therewith; and
iold a public hearing a; the Llty
p.m., notice of said pubiic
law and in accordance wt*_h the
18,03, to hear and consider
to investigate and make findings
WHEREAS, said Commission, after Jue inspection, investigation and s[udy made
by i•self and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offAred at said hearing, does ffnd and determine the following facts:
1, That the petitioner proposes a waiver of the following to construct a
freestand.nq sEgn:
(a) SELTION i8.05.~93.~2~ - Naximum number of freestandin si ns.
1 permitted; 2 proposed
(b) SECTIQN 18.05.~93.0231 - Hinimum distance between freestandinq sT ns.
300 eet required;
1~~ proposed)
2. That the above-mentfoned waivers are hcreby granted on the basTs that
the petltioner demonstra[ed that a hardship exists due to the amount of street
frontage on Katslla Avenue; that [he proRosed slgning wouid be permissable Tf a
parcel map were recorded; and that the two major tenants of the shopping center are
subJect of the proposed signs.
3, That there are exceptlonal or extraordinary circumstances or condttions
applicabte to the proper[y involved or to the in[ended use of the property that do
not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same viclnitv and zone.
Pc7s-~ks
4, That the requested varlance is necessary for the preservation ahd
en~oyment of a subs[antial property rtght possessed by other property in the ,ame
vicinity and zone, and denied to the nroperty in auestion.
5. That the requested varianc~ r~itl not be materialty detrimentai to the
public welfare or injurious to the pfoperty or improvements in such vicinity and zone
in which the property is located.
6, That no one indicated thefr presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspo~dence was received in opposition to the subJect
petition.
ENVIRO~!HENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planning Otrector or his auLhor(zed
representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition
of Categoricai Exemptions, Class il, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the Lity of Anahetm
Environmental Impact Report Guidelines and is, therefore, c3tegoricalty exempt from
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOw', TtiEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Cfty Planning Lommission
does hereby grant subjec[ Petition for Varlance, upon the following conditions which
are hereby found to be a necessary prernquisite to the prooosed use of the subJect
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the CiLize~s of the
City of Anahefm:
1. That subJecc property shafl be developed substanttally in accordance
with plans and speclfica[ions on file with the Cttyof Anaheim marked Exhibits Nos. i
and 2.
6E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ci[y Planntng Commission does hereby
f~nd and determine that adoption of this Resolution is exnressiy predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and ali of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condltion, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenf~rcea6le
by the ftnal judgment of any court of competent Jurisdlction, then this Resolution~
and any approvals herein tontained„ shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOIt7G RESOLUTION fs signed and approved by me this 3rd day of July
1978. ~
L N, ~ E CiT PLANIIING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~ c.~~- , .t~ ~,~c~.a.
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANN~I~G COMMISSION
-2- Pt78-t45
.
. ~.. .' ~..~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edi[h L. Harris, Secretary of the Rnahelm City Planning Canmission. do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adoptnd at a meeting of
the ARaheim City Planning Canmission held on July 3~ 1978~ at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vate of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, OAVid~ NERBST, JONNSON, KING, LINN, TOLAR
NOES: LOMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMlSSi0NER5: NONE
IN WIT~lESS WHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of July, 1978.
~lac~.~l.. ~ ~,U1. .
SECRETAr,Y. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC78-t45