PC 78-152RE54LU710N N0. PC78-152
A RESOLUTION OF THE AIIAHEIM CITY PLANNtNG COHNISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERPIIT N~. ~853 BE GRAN7ED
1~MEREAS, [he Anahelm Ci[y Planning Commission did receive a veriffed
Petition for Conditional Use Pcrmit fron GROVE STREET ASSOCIATES, 1212 North
BroadN~,•~ Santa Ana, California~ 9270 . owner, and JOHN HENNES. 603 Rainler Avenue~
Orange, Callfornla 92665. agent, of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim~ County of Orange~ State o~ Calffornia, described as:
That portton of Lot 1 of Section 5. Totimship 4 South. Range 9
West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. in the Ci[y of Anahetm,
according to the Offlctal Ptat filed in Distrfct ~and Office April
tj. 1875. described as follows: Parcei No. 4 as shown on a map
flled In book 105~ pages 9 and 10 of Parcel Haps, in the office of
the County RecorJer of said County.
WHEREAS. the City Planning Lommission did hold a public hearing at the City
Ha11 in the City of Anaheim on July 3, 1°7~~ at 1:30 p.m,~ notlce of said public
hearing having been duly given as requlred by law and in accardance wtth the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1$.03~ tn hear ar.d consider
evtdence for and against said proposed conditlonal use and to tnvesti9ate and make
ftndings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
11HERE.'~S, said Cor,mission~ after due inspection, investigation and study made
by Icself and in its behalf~ and after due consideration of all cvidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determfne the following facts:
i. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditienal use
permit ls authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 1E,61.050.070 to Hit: to
perm)t an automo6ile resto~ation facility With waiver of:
SECTIOt~ 18.06.060.022 - Minimum number of ar~inq s aces
5 s aces required;
2 spaces proposcd)
2, That [he proposed use Is hereby granted, subJect to revlew ac [he end
of one(1) year by the Planning Lommission, to determine whether or not the ust has
had a detrime~tal effecc on the surrounding area because of noi~e. trafftc o~ other
dTsturbances.
3, That the requested wafver is hereby granted on the basTs that thc
proposed use will provide a service to a limited number of customers specificalty
Tnteres[ed in the restoration of Corvettes and wlll not generate the need for the
number of parktng spaces requtred by Lode.
4. That the proposed use wtil not adverscly affect the adJolning land uses
and the growth and development of the area ln which it ls proposed to be located,
5, That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use 15 adequate to
allow thc ful) development of the proposed use in a manner ~ot detrimental to the
PC78-152
particular area nor to the peace~ healch, safe[y and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the granting of the Condittonal Use Permlt under the conditions
Imposed, if any~ ti+ill not be detrimental to the pcace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citlzens of the City of Anaheim.
7. That one person indica[ed their presence at said public hearing tn
oppositlon; and that no correspondence was recelved in opposition to the subJect
petTtlon.
EtIVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDIIJG: That thc Anaheim City Planning Corm~lssion has
reviewed the proposal to perm t an automobile restor~tion facility witfi a walvcr of
minimum number of parking spaces on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting
of approximately 0.6 acre located at the easterly cul-de-sac terminus of Grove
Street, having a frontage of approximatcly 42 feet on the southeast side of Grove
Street, haiing a maximum d~pth of approximatcly 1p? feet, LcTng located approximately
1005 feet north of thc centcriine of La Palma Ave~ue; and does hereby approve the
Negative Declaration from the reauirement to prepare an envirorunental impact report
on the hasis [hat there wuld be no significant individuat or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due [o [he approval of this Ilegative Declaration since the
Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for general industrial land uses
commensuratc with the proposal; that no sensitive cnvironmen[al impac[s are involved
in the proposal; chat the Initial 5[udy sutYnitted by the pe[itfoner indicates no
significant T~dlviduat ar cumutattve adverse environ~cntal tmpaccs; artd that the
Negative Declaracion substantiaiing the foregoing findings Is on file in the City of
Anaheim Planning Oepartment.
NOW. 7HEREFORE, BE IT RES6LVED that the Anahefm City Planning Cornmission
doas hercby granc subJect Petition for Londitional Use Permit, upon the following
conJitions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequlsite to the proposed use
of the subJect property in order to preserve the safe[y and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anahelm:
1. That apRraprlatc w~tcr assessneni £ecs as detcrri~ed by thc Dlr~ctor of
Public Utilittes shall be paid to the City of Anahetm prior to the issuance of a
building pcrmit.
2. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay the traffic sTgnal
assessnent fee for industrial uses amount(ng to $30.00 per 1000 square feet of
buitdtng or fraction thereof.
3, That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on flle wtth the City of Anaheim marked ExhtbTt Nos. 1
through 3.
4, That Conditton No. 2~ above-mentioned~ shall be complied with prior to
the commencenent of the activity authorized undtr thts rest~lutton, or prior to the
time that the bullding permit is Issued~ or rilthln a period of one year from date
hereof, whichever occurs first. or sueh further time as the flanning Commlsslon may
grant.
S. That Condition No. 3, above-mentloned~ shall be canplted wtth p~tor to
finai bulldtng and zoning inspectlons.
_p_ PC78-150
~
6. That all restoration actlvities shall bc conducted inside tha building
and that there shatl be no outdoor st~rage of vehlcles.
7, That upon written request by tha petitioner~ the Pla~ning Lomm(ssion
shall review the use at the end of one year to determine whether or not the use has
had a detrimental effect on the surrounding uses, if there has been no detrimental
effect. the use may continue without further requests for revtew.
BE IT FURTHER RESQLVED that Che Anaheim City Ptanning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoptlon of thts Resolutfon is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance wtth each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the ftnal Judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herelrt contained, shall be deemed nult and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed a~d approved by me this 3rd day of July
1978. ~
. ~
, ANAHEf TY PL ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
_~c~~t~k, ~ ~~~.
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMHISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF 0?tANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris. Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Cortmisslon~ do
hereby certify that the foregolny resolution was passed and adopted a[ a meeting of
the A~ahetm City Planning Cormilssion hcld ~n July 3, 1978, at 1:30 p.m,, by the
following vote of the membcrs thereof:
AYES: COMHISSIONERS: BARNES, DAVID, HERBST~ JOHNSON, KING, LINN, TOLAR
NOES: COHMISSIOt1ER5: NONE
A85ENT: COMMISS(dNERS: NOt1E
IIJ 1JITNE55 WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of July, 1978.
~~,c~ ~ G`Ya.t~s.~.-
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC78-152