PC 78-159RESOLUTION N0. PC78-15.9
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PER111T N0. 1842 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS~ the Anahelm City Planning Cortmission did recelve a verifled
Petitlon for Gonditional Use Permit from EQUITEC 77-REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, P. 0. Box
1106, Lafayette. Caiifornla 94549, owner~ and JIM'S DISCOUNT NAREHOUSE, 1611 South
Sunkist Street, Anaheim, Californla 92806, agent, of certaln real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 26, Township 4
South, Ran9e 10 West in the Rancho San Juan LaJon de Santa Ana, as
shown on a Map recorded in book 51, Page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps,
records of Orange Councy, Gallfornia, descrtbed as follows:
Parcel 1~ as shown on a Map recorded ln book 81, page 32 of Parcel
Maps ln the Office cf the County Recorder of said Orange County.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Cortm~isslon dId schedule a public hearing at the
City Hall in the Ci[y of Anaheim on June 19, 1978, at 1:30 p.m., notfce of satd
pub~ic hear(ng having been duty given as required by law and in accordance with the
pravisians of the Anaheim M~nicipal Code. Ghapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and ayainst satd proposed conditionat use and to investigate and make
f7ndings and recommendatfons in connectlon therewith; sald public hearing havTng been
continued to the Planning Comnissfon meeting of July 17~ 1g76; and
NHEREAS, said Cortmission, after due inspection. investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and afier due cansideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does fi~d and determine the following facts:
1. Thai the proposed use is properly one for whtch a co~ditional use
permit is authorized by Anahelm Muntcipai Code Section 18,03.a30.010 to wit: to
permit the retail sale of furniture in the ML (Industrlal, Limited) zone.
2, That the proposed use is hereby granted on the basis that nearby
property on the north side of Katelia Avenue is currently developed with commerciai
uses; that the use is existing and has caused no adverse parking or traffic problems
to the surrounding industrial area; and that the large warehouse-type industrlal
facilitles located on subJect property are appropriate for the proposed use which
tncludes the storing, assembiing, and finishing large pieces of furni[ure.
3, 7hat the proposed use will not adversely affect the adJoining land uses
and the growth and develop~ent of the area in whtch Pt Ts proposed to be located,
4, That the size and shape of the sTte proposed fcr the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general wetfare of the. CTtlzens
of the Ci:y of Anahelm.
5. That the grantin5 of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditTons
imposed, If any, will not be detrimental to the peac~. health. safety and general
welfare of the Citlzens of the City of Anahefm,
PC78-t59
i •. j
6. That no or.e (ndicated thelr presence at said public hearing in
oppositlon; and that no correspondence was receTved in oppositlon to the subJect
petitton.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planning Di~ector or his authorized
representative has determ ned that the proposed proJect falls within the definltion
of Categorical ExempCions, Class 1, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the City of Anaheim
Environmental Impact Report G~ii~ellnes and ts. therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to prepare an EIR,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planntng Commtssion
does hereby grant subject Petition for Condltional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
oP the subJect property In order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the Ci[y of Anahelm:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shali pay the traffic signal
asse~smen[ fee difference between industi'ta) and commercial uses amounting to $333.00
per 1000 square feet of bullding nr fraction thereof.
2. That subjeci property shall be developed substantiatly in accordance
wi[h plans and speclfTcattons on file with the City of Anahetm marked Exhibit Nos. 1
and 2.
3. That Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall bc complled with prlor to
the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or privr to the
time that the building per,nit ts issued, cr withln a period of onc: year from date
hereof~ whlchever occurs ftrst. or such further tlme rs the Planning Commission may
grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pianning Commission does hereby
find and determtne that the adoptton of this Resolu[ton is expressly pre~licated upon
applicant's compllance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any condition or any part thereof, be deciared Invalid or unenforceable by the
finat judgment of any courc of competent Jurisdlciton, then this !tesolution, and any
approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and vold,
1978.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 17th day of July,
~r~~f~F+~'~'RO-,f'E~b7'E C~i'u~e,,.s~
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION
ATTEST:
(p ~-~^ ~ l~'~ca
ECRE AR , ANAHEIH CIT LAN ING COMMISSION
-2- PC78-t59
.
' ~...~ t=1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Canmission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolutlon was passed and adopted at a meetTng of
the Anahelm Clty Planning Commisston held on July 17~ 1978, at 1:30 p.m.~by the
fotlowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARN~S~ DAVID, JOHNSON, KING~ LINN~ TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COHMISSIONERS: HERBST
IN NITNE55 WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of July~ 1978.
tG~ ~ ~
SECRETARY, ANAt1E1M CITY PLANNING COMIIISSION
-3- PC78-159