PC 78-160RESOLUTIOh N0, PC 7~~160
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIH CITY PLANNI~IG COMMISSION
THAT PETITIOt~ FOR VARIANLE N0. 3~31 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Canmission did recelve a verifled
Petltian for Variance from BERNAR00 M. YORBA, JR., 544o East Santa Ana Canyon Road,
Anahelm, California 92807, owner, and RONALD E. AILEN, 158z Parkway Loop, Sulte A,
Tustln, California 92680, (agent) of certafn real property situated in the City of
Anahelm, County of Orange, State of Cali`ornia descrtbed as:
PARCEL 3, ~~ THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFOR~IIA, A5 SHONN ON A PARCEI MAP FILED IN BOOY. 50 PAGE 36 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RELORDER OF SAiD COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Pldnning Co~nission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on July 17, 1978, at 1:30 p.n., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Lode, Chap[er 1~.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed ~ariance and tn investlgate and make findtngs
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, sald Commission, after due inspecttont lnvestigation and study made
by Ttself and in Its behaif, and after due consideration of atl evidence and reports
offered at sald hearing, d~es find and determine the following facts:
i, That the petitioner proposes a ~raiver of the following to construct a
free-standing ground-mounted sign;
(a) SECTIOfI 18.05.~91.010 - Pcrmitted signing
one s opping center identification sign permitted;
onc slnqle ienant identi ication siq~
proposed
(b) SECTIGN 18.05.09~•0>> - Maximum si n~is la surface.
1 dis la surface permitted;
3 proposed
(c) SECTION 18.05.091.014 - Maximum siqn area)
20 s uare eet permitted;
90 square eet proposed.)
2, That the proposed waivers are hereby granted on the basis that the
proposed monument sign ls visuatly iow p~ofile and has a substantial setback from
Santa Ana Canyon Road; that the design of the rronument sign is in keeping wtth the
design of the bullding and landscaping and that It witl be located close to the
building creattng the illusion of being an integra) part of the building,
' PC78-160
,,
;`
.`
3. Tha[ the petitloner stipulated that no other tenant iden[ificatlon nor
advertising than shown on the approved exhibits wlil be placed on the proposed sign
and that it wiil be constructed ln ~ccordancc with the pZans and specifications
submitted.
4, That the variance is 9ranted subJect to the plans and sp~cificatlons
being submltted to and approved by the City Traffic Engineer to ensure that traffic
visibility is not Impaired.
5. That there are exceptional or excraordinary circumstances or conditlons
applicable [o the property involved or to the intended use of the property [hat do
~ot appiy generally to Che property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone,
6. That the requested varta~ce is necessary for [he preservatlon and
enJoyment of a substantlal property rlght possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
7. Tha[ the requested variance wtll not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or inJurious to the property or inprovements in such vicinfty and zone
in which Che property is located.
8. That no one fndicated their presence at said public heartng in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in oppositlon to the subJect
pe[itton.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Pianning Director or his authorized
representattve has determ ~ed that the proposed proJect falls within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class il, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the City of Anaheim
Environmen[al Impact Report Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically cxempt from
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subJect Peti[ion for Variance, upon the followi~g conditlons which
are hereby found to be a necessary prerequlsite to the proposed use of [he subJect
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens o7 the
City of Anahelm:
1. That the owner(s) of subJect prope~ty shall request and be granied
approval for the deletton of Conditfon No. 6 of Rasolutlon ~~o. 77R-271 approved in
connection wtth Variance No, 2875, which states: "Tlwt the proposed development
shall comply with all sfgnin9 requirements of the Scenic Lorridor Zone-Overlay~ as
stipulated to by the petitioner."
2. That the plans a~d specifications shall be submittad to and approved by
the City Traffic Engfneer.
3. That subJect property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anahetm marked Exhibit Nos. 1
and 2,
-2- Pt78-160
J
4. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned~ shall be tomplied with
prlor to the commencement of the activity authorized undar this resolutlon, or prior
to the time that the building permit Is issued~ or within a perlod of one year from
date hereof~ whtchever occurs firs:, or such further time as the Planning Comm)ssion
may grant.
5. That Condition No. 3~ above mentioned, shall be complied with prlor to
flnal buitding a~d zoning inspectlons.
BE IT fURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Cortmisslon does hereby
find and determine that thc adoptlon of this Resolution is expressly predtcated upon
applicant's canpllance ~ith each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any condttlon or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the
final Judgment of any court of cnmpetent jurtsdiction, then this Resolution, and any
approvals herein contained, shalt be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOIMG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 17th day of July,
1978.
~~__ .o ,B~~J
CHAIRMAN PRO TEMPORE
ANAHEIM CITY P~A~lN117G COMMlSSIQN
ATTEST:
~Q.~.~. ,~.° ~.~.,~:.
SECRET Y~ A4AHEIM CIT LANNING COHMISSION
STATE Of CALifORN~A )
COU~7TY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
1, Edith L. Harris~ Secretary of the Anaheim City Plannin9 Gommission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anahetm City Planning ~ommission held on Juty 17~ 1978, at 1:30 p.m.,by the
following vote of Lhe membars thereof:
AYES: COMMt5510NER5: BARNES, DAVID, JOHNSON, KINC,~ LINN, TOLAR
NOES: COMMt5510NER5: NODIE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
IN W17NESS WHEItEOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of July, tg78,
~~ ~ `~-
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM LITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3° PC79-160