PC 78-17RESOLUTION N0. PC78-17
A RESOLUTION OF 7HE RNhHEiM CITY PLA~tNiNG COMMISSION
THAT PETI710N FOR R~CLASSIFICATION N0. 77-78-43 BE GP.ANTED.
NHEREA5, the Anahelm Ci[y Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclasstfication from MARINERS SAVtN;S AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Westcliff
at Oover, Newport Bcach, California 92663, owner, and RAYMOND T. TROLL, 12 171 Trask
Avenue ~2, Gar~en Grove, California 92643, agent, of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
THE WEST 150.OQ FEET OF TNE EAST i1Q8.00 FEET OF THE NOP,TH HALF OF
THF. NORTHEAST QUARTER, OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTIQN 13,
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, IN TlIE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, CITY
OF ANAHEIM, COUtJTY Of ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER NAP
RECORDED It~ BOOK 51 PAGE 11 OF M15CELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY RECOP,DER OF SAID COU~lTY. EXCEPT THE NORTH 66.00
fEET. A150 EXCEPT THAT PORTIO~~ LVING SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY
LINE OF PAKCEL N0. B1-716-,Oi ~N C0~lNECTION WITH CASE N0. 88598,
LIS PFN~Et~S, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WFiICtI WAS RECOP,DED JUNE 2, i96n
IN BOOK 5271 PAGE 136 OF OFFICIAL RELORDS.
Wt~EREAS, the City Plannin9 Conmission did hold a public hearing at the Ctty
Hall in the C1ty af Anaheim on January 3~, 1Q78, at 1:30 p.m., notice of sald public
heartng having been duly given as required by lar+ and in accordance with the
provistons of the A~aheim Hun!cipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and [o investivz[e and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
41HEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and s[udy made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine [he following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from
the RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agriculturai) Zone to the R11-120R (Residen[iai,
Multipie-Family) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim Generai Plan designa[es subject property for medium-
density residential tand uses.
3. That any modifica[ion to the development plans, as presented (Exhibit
Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4) shall be revtewed and approved by the Pianning Commission. prior
to the issuance of building permits.
4. That the proposed reclassificatfon of subJect property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the comnunity.
5. That the pr~~osed reclassificatfon of suhJect property does properly
relate to the zones and Cheir permitted uses lor.ally established in closc proximity
to subJect property and to the zones and thelr permitted uses generally established
throughout [he community.
PC78-17
6, That no one indicated their prescnce at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to ~ubject
petition.
ENVIRONMENT~L IMPACT FIPIDIN~: That the Anaheim City Pianning Lommission has
reviewed the subject proposal to reclassify the zoning from RS-a-43,000
(RESIDENTIAL/AGRICUITUP,AL) to RM-120Q (RESIDE~ITIAL~ MULTIPLE-FAMILY) on an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approxtmately 1.8 acre having a
frontage of approximately 15~ feet on the south stde of Lifoximate~nue1o~5vifeet
maximum depth of approximately 557 feet, and heing located aPP Y
west of the centerline of Hagnolia Ave~ue; and docs herehy aoprove the Negative
Declara[ion from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the
basis that there would be no significant individuai or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to tfie approval of this Negative Declaration since the
Anaheim General Plan designates the subject pronerty for medium-density residential
land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensttive environmental tmpacts are
involved in the proposal; that thc Inltial Study submitted by the petttioner
indicates no significant individual or cumutative adverse environmental impacts; and
that the Negative Declaratton substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the
Gity of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOU, TNEREFQRE, BE 1T RESOL~'ED that thc Anaheim City Planning Lommission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
18-Zoning of the Anaheim uunicipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from the RS-A-43~000 (RESIDENTI4L/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and [o incorporate said
described property into the RN-1200 (RESIDENT~AL, MULTIPLE-FA'•tILY) 20td~ upon the
following conditions which are hereby found Lo be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare
of the Citizens of the Lity of Anaheim:
1. That sidewalks shall be installed along Lincoln Avenuc as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in
the OfFice of [he City Engineer.
p, That the owner(s) of subjec[ property shall pay to the Lity of Anaheim
the sum of EO cents per front foo[ along Llncoln Avenue for tree pian[1ng purposes.
3. That the owner(s) of su6Ject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $3.50 per front foot along Lincoln Avenue for street lighti:~g purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provtded in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Otrector bf Puhlic uorks.
5, ThaL fire hydrants shall be installcd and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prio~ to commencement
of structural framing.
6. That subject property shall be served by underground utitities.
7. That dralnage of subject praperty shall be disposed or in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
-2- PC78-17
8. That the owner of subJect property shall pay to the City of Anahefm the
appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the
City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
9. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Director of
Public Utili[tes shall oe paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a
building permlt.
10. Prior to the tntroduction of an ordinance rezoning subJect property,
Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above-mentloned, shall be compteted. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shali become null and void by action of the
Planning Commission unless said conditions are canplted with within one year from the
date hereof, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
11. That subJec[ property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file rii[h the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1,
2. 3 and 4, provided, however, that any modifications shall be submitted to the
Plan~ing Commission for review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits.
12, That Condition Nos. 1, 4, 6 and 7, above-mentio~ed, shall be complied
with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
THE fORE~0ING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 30th day of
January, 1978.
,~~~v-~~
CNAI MA~~, ANAHEIM CIT PlR!dNING CO'1MISSION
ATTEST:
~L.. K • ~
5ECRETARY, ANANEIM CITY LANNINr, COMMISS N
STATE OF CALIFOP,NIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANFHE~M )
I, Edith L. Harris. Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission~ do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolu[ion was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on January 3~, ~978, ac 1:30 p.m., by the
followtng vote of the memhers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ DAVID, HERBST~ JOHNSON, KIHr,~ TOLAR
NOES: LOMMi551bNERS: NONE
ABSEMT: COMMISSIONERS: LIWN
~978
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thts 30th day of January,
~-~ ~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEihi CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC7B-17