PC 78-184i :
~ :.
RESOLUTION N0. PC 7E-184
A RESOLUTIOH OF THE ANAHEIM LITY PLANt~ING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR VARIA'ICE N0, 3~33 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission dld receive a verified
Petition for Variance from ZAVEN AND ANNA M, KULhJIAN~ 411 South Paseo Real~ Anahelm,
California 92807~ owners. and AlAMO CEHTER, 11747 Firestone Boulevard, Norwalk.
Catifornia 90650, (agent) of certain real property situated in the City of Anahelm~
County of Orange, State of Californla described as:
PARCEL I: Lot 59 of Tract No. 8220, as shown on a Map recorded tn
book 335, pages 33 to 41 inclusive, of Misceilaneous Maps, records
of Orange Coun[y, California.
WHEREAS, thc C(ty Planning Commission did hold a public heartng at the City
Hall In the City of Anahetm on July 31, 1978, a[ 7:00 p.m.~ notice of said publlc
hearing having been duly given as required by law and (n accordance with Che
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and constder
evidence for and againsc said proposed variance a~d to investiga[e and nake findings
and recommendations in cc~necLion therewith; and
WNEREAS, said Commtssion, after due inspec[iort, investigatton and study made
by itself and tn its behalf, and after due consideratton of all evidence and reparts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a waiver of the following to convert a
garage into a game roorn:
SECTION 13.27.063.0123 - Minimum numher of arkin s aces.
3-car garaae required;
2-car garagc proposed)
2, That che above-mentioned waiver is hereby granted on the basis that the
petitioner demo~strated that a hardshlp exists in that thc property is irregularly
shaped thereby severeiy restricting any structural add(tions at any other iocation~
thai many properties in the immediate vicini[y have been developed aith 2-car garages
having setbacks of less than 25 feet from che property Itne, and that denial would
deprive this property of prtvileges bein~ enjoyed by othcrs fn the same victnity and
zone.
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property fnvoived or to the intended use of the property that do
not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicintty and zone.
4. That the requested varlance Is necessary for the preservation and
e~Joyment of a substantlal property right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone. and denied to the property 1n question.
5. That the requested variance will not be materially det~Tmental to the
public welfare or inJurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone
in which the property is located,
PC78-t84
a" ~4.
6, Thac no one indicated their presence at said publtc hearirsg In
oppostt(on; and thot no correspondence was recelved in opposlcion [o the sub)ect
petltion.
ENVIROMME~~TAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planning Dlrector or hts authorized
representat v~as ~term ne that the proposed proJect fails wtthin the definltton
of Categorical Exempttans~ Class 1~ as define.: in Para9raph 2 of the Cfty of Anaheim
Environmental Impact Repo~t Guidelfnes and is. therefore~ categorlcally exemp[ from
Yhe requlrement to preparc an EIR,
NOW, THEREFORE, BF. IT RESOL~lED tha[ the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petdtion for Londitiona) Use Permlt. upon the followtng
conditions w'nich are hereby faund to be a ~ecessary prerequlslte to the proposed u5e
of the subject property in order• to preserve the safety and genera) welfare of the
Cittzens of the City of Anaheim:
1, That subJect property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on fil~: wtth the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
and 2.
BE IT FURTHEP, RESOLVED that the Anaheim C1[y Planning Commtssion does hereby
find and determine that adoption of [his Resolution is expressiy predicated upon
applicant's caRpliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condTtlon, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the flnal judgment of any court of competent Jurisdiction. then this Resolutlon.
and any approvals herein co~tained. shalt be deemed null and voTd.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTlON is si9ned and approved by me this 31st day of July
~978. , ~
H IRMAN, ANA, ,Y L NNING LOMM SSION
ATTEST:
~~ ~ ~ ~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY LAMHING COHM1551011
STATE OF CALIFGRNtA )
COUNTY 'JF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AHAHEIM }
I~ Edith L. Harris~ Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Carmisslon, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passcd a~d adopted at a meetin9 of
the knaheim City Planning Cammission held on July 31, 1978, at 1:30 p.m.~ by the
followtng vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COHMISSIO~~ERS: BARNES~ DAVID~ HERBST. JOHPISON, KING. TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERC: LINN
IN ViTNE55 WNEREOF, I have hereu~to set my hand this 31st day o4` Juty~ 1978.
`~~ ,Y -~_
SECRETARY~ ANAMEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- Pt78-t84