PC 78-193RESOLUTION N0. PC78-193
A RESOLUTIOFI OF THC A`lAHEIH CITY PLAF111111f COMMISSION
7tlAT PETITION FOR CONUITIONAL USE PERMIT ~JO. 1872 UE GRAN7[D
wtiEREAS, the Maheim City Planning Carenlssion diJ receive a verificd
Petition for Co~dtiional Use Pcrmit from ELIZABETH SLffAFEFt, 1500 West Broadway~
Maheim, talifornia~ 92fi02, owner, and REUEREND ROBERT L. EDNARDS, 9~~3 South David
Street, Anaheim, Lalifornia 92202. a9ent of czrtain real property situated in the
C[ty of Anahetm, Cou~ty of Orange, State of California, described as:
Lot A of Tract No. 9201~ as shorm on map recordeJ in Book 380~
PaQes 23, 24~ 25 and 26 af Misceilaneous Naps, Records of said
Orange County. Lalifornia; and The East half of Lots 9 and 16 of
Helen and Lynch's Addition Lo Anaheim~ as shown on a Nap recorded
in Book 442~ page 158 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles County~ Ca.
Exceptin7 therefror.~ a strip 30 feet wide alo~g thc East Itne.
Also excepting therefrom the folloNing: Beginning at the
Noriheast corner of said Lot 9; thence South 88° 54' 42" Nest
233.06 feet along the Nor[h line of said Lo[ 9 to the [rue point
of beginning; thence South 0° 10' 08" East 142.41 feet along a
line paraliel to the East iine of Lot 9; thence North 88° 5~' 42"
Easi 73•~3 feec; thence Souch 0~ 10' 0~:" East 91.61 fee[ to a
poin[ on a curve concave Southeasterly For a radius of b5.00 feet;
th~nce Southeasterly along said curve fran a tangeni bearing South
70 10' 12" East an arc distance of 81.33 feet to a reverse curve
having a radius of 45.G0 fe~t. a radial from this point having a
bearing of North SG~ 3G' 42" Nest; thencc Southerly 10,27 feet
along said curve through a central angle of 13° Ot~' 12"; thence
Uorth 89~ O1' 14" East 11b.24 fcet to [he West lir,e of the East
30.00 feet of said Lot 9; [hcnce along said West line ';orth 00 10'
08" Wcst 310.84 feet to ~he North line of said Lot 9; [hence along
said Nor[h linc Sou[h 88 54' 42" ldest 209.OG feet to the true
patat of teginrsing.
WI{EREAS, the City Planning Lortanission did hold a publlc hearing at the City
Hal) in the City of Anahcim on Augus[ 14, 1978~ a[ 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly 9tven as requfred by law and (n accordance ~rith the
provisia~s of the M aheim MuniciRat Code, Chapter 18.~3. to hear and consider
evidence for and agains[ said proposed conditional use and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewtth; and
UHEREAS, said Lomnissio~, after d~e inspection, inves[igation and study made
by i[self and in i[s bchalf~ and after due consideratTon of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does fi~d and detcrmine the following facts:
1. 7hat the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit Is autharizrd by Anaheim Hunic~pa) Code Section 18.21.050.070 to NIt: to
retain nine (9) beehives.
2. Thai the proposed use is here6y gran[ed to pe rtnit a maximum of nlne ~9)
beehives, subject to yea~ly revtcw and consideration for extensions of time. upon
written requcst by the petitione-.
Pt78-193
3. That there have been beehives on the subject property for more than
fifty ~50) ycars.
4. That the proposed use will not advcrsely affect the adJolning land uses
and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed tu be located.
5. That the slze and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development or the proposed use In a manner not detrtmental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general weifare of the Cittzens
of the City of Anaheim.
G, That the granting of the ~onditional Use Permit under the canditions
imposed, tf any, will not be detr(mental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of Lhe Citizens of [he City of Anaheim.
7. That 2 persons indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subJect
petition.
E~l41RONMENTAL IMPACT fINDING: The Planning Director or his authorized
representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Llass 1, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the City of Anaheim
Environmental ~mpact Report Guidelines and is, [herefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to prepare an E'R.
NOU, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Ar.aheim City Planning Gommission
does hereby grant subJect Petition for Conditional Us~e Permit, upon the following
condition which is hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to [he proposed use of
the =::oject property in order [o preserve the safety and general wetfare of the
Litizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. Tha[ subJect property shali be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1.
BE IT FUP,TkEP, R~SOLVED that ihe Ar,ahclm City Plannirtg Coc:rnission docs hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution Is expressly predicated upon
applican['s compltance wtth each and all of the conditions hereinabove se[ forth.
Should a~y such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceabie
by the final Judgment of any court of competent jurtsdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contatned, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FORFGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved~me thts 14th day of
August 1978. /
~' G
N, Atl ~TY PL NNING COMMISSIDN
ATTEST:
~~G ..1.'' ~/,~~,~_-.
SECRETARY. ANAHEIM CITY PLRNNIN6 COMMISSfON
-2- PC78-193
~ _
. ( i _~,
STATE OF C/1L I FORN IA )
COl1NTY OF OR/1tIGE ) ss.
CITY UF At3AHEIM )
1~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahetm City Planninq CommissTon~ do
hereby certtfy that the foregoing resolutlon was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anahelm Ctty Planning Cemmtssion held on August 14. 1978, at 1:30 p.m „ by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIOHERS: BARNES, DAVID, HERBST, JOHNSON~ KING~ LINN
NOES: COMN15~tONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLAR
1978.
IN WITNESS NHEREOf, I have hereunto set my hand this 14th day of August
~~ 1° ~,~.~.
SECRE7ARY~ ANAHEIM CITY LANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC78-193