PC 78-196RESOLUTIO~! N0. PC7~-ig6
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEI"f C17Y PLANMING COH!115SION
TIiAT PE7ITION fOR RECLASSiFILATION N0. 78-79-10 BE GRANTED.
IJHEREAS, the Anaheim City PlannTng Commission Jid receive a vertfied
petition for Reclassification from FOREST LAWN CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, 1712 South
Glendale Avenue, G2endale, CalifornPa 91209, owner, and BEARD DEVELOPMEIJT CO., 4121
Westerty Place n105, Newport Beach, California 92G60 and SANTA ANITA OEVELOPHEHT
CORP,, P. 0, Box 1880, Newport Beach, Catifornia 92560, age~ts~ of certain real
property situated ln the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as follows:
PARGEL A- COMMERCIAL SITE - DEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 2, IN 7HE
LITY OF A~~AHEIM, COUNTY OF ORAtIGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN
0~~ A PARCEL MAP FILED IN Bo~Y. 66, PAGE ~i7 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE
OfFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUt~TY; DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID
COR~~ER BEING THE CENTERLINE ItlTERSEGTION OF RONNEYA DRIVE (WEST)
At~D EUCL I D AVEPJUE; THEIJCE 50° 02' 23"W 528.00 FEET AL011G THE
CEMTERLINE OF EUCLID AVENUE; THENCE N89° 55'37"'~ 345.00 fEET;
THENCE NO° 02'23"E ]25.00 FEET; TfiENCE N89°55'37"H 2O.00 FEET;
7}iEIrCE ft6~OZ'23"E 403.00 FEET TO TNE CENTERLINE OF R011NEYf+ DP.IVE;
THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 589°SS'37"E 365•00 FEET TO TNE POINT
OF BEG1NtiING. EXLEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIOtiS N17H ROMNEYA
DRIVE AND EUCLID AVENUE. AS StIOWN ON SAID PARCEI MAP.
PAkLEL B- MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL SITE - BEING A PQRTION OF PARCEL
, N HE CI Y OF NAHEIN, OUH Y OF 0?.ANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
AS SHOUr> ON A PARLEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 66, PAr,E 47 OF PARLEL MAPS~
II~ THE OFfICE OF THE LOUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: LOMME~ICIIJG AT THE NORTHEAS7 CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2,
SAID COR~lER BEit;G TNE CEitTEi{Lt~tE IFlTLRSECTtOtt OF ROMEJEYi. DRiVE
(WEST) A~~D EUCLIQ AVENUE; THEfILE SO°02'23"L~ 528.OQ FEET AIOHG THE
CENTERLINE OF EUCLID AVEtJUE; TNEt~CE N89°55'37"~! 345.00 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENLE N0jD02'23"E 125.00 FEET; THENCE N69°
55~37"W 20.00 FEET; THENCE 110° 02`23"E 403.00 FEET TO THE
CENTERLINE OF ROMtJEYA DRIVE; TNENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLlNE N89°
55'37"u 4S5•00 FEET TO TtiE NORTHSIEST CORNER OF SAIC PRRCEL 2;
THENCE ALONS THE IJESTERLY PARCEL LINE THEREOF SO°02'23"W 528.00
FEET; THE~CE 589° 55'37"E 475.00 FEET TO TNE TRUE POItaT QF
BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PURTION INCLUDED 1JITHIN
ROMNEYA DRIVE, AS SHOWN ON SA10 PARCEL MAP.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission dtd hold a publlc hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on August 28, 1978, at 1:30 p.m,, notlce of saTd public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anahelm Nunlcipal Code, Chapter 18.03, co hear and consider
evidence for and against sald proposed reclasslficatlon and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connectton therewith; and
HHEREAS, sald Commissio~, after due lnspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in lts behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said heari~g, does find and determine [he follawing facts:
PC78-196
1, That the petitloner proposes reclassiflcatlon of subJect property from
the RM-1200 (Residcntial~ Multiple-Family; to the CL (Commercial, Llmited) Zone.
2. That the Anahelm General Plan desTgnates subJect property for
commercial professional lund uses.
3. That the proposeo reclass(fication is hereby granted subJect to the
petit(oner's s[fpulation to develop [he driveways to adJace~t streets in accordance
with the revised plan submftted at the public he~ri~g, Identificd as Exhibit No. 8,
said plan subJect to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer; and that the medfan
at the access driveway (ide~tified as Ho. 5) shall be modified to allo~~ adequate
stacking area for left turning traffic.
4, That the proposed reclasstficatiort of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the ordcrly and proper development of the community.
5. That [he proposed reciassification of subject property does properly
relate to the zones and thetr permitced uses locally es[ablished in close prox(mity
to subJect property and to the zones and thelr permitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
6. That the proposed reclassifica[ion of subject property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Clrculation
Element of the General Plan, due to the an[icipa[ed increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensiftca[ton of tand use.
7, That no one indicated [heir presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in oppos~tlon to the subJect
petit(on.
ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACT FI~IDING: That che Anaheim Ci[y Planning Corrcnission has
reviewed the propcsal to reclassl y portfon A of subJect property from the RM-1200
(RESIDEWTIAI, MUl71PLE-fAHILY) to the CL ~C0~IHERCIAL, LI+~ITED) zore *~ ne-~it a
drive-through restaurant on a rectangularly shaped oarce! of tand consisting of
approximately 3.3 acres located at the southwest corner of Romneya Drive and Euclid
Street, having approximate frontages of 312 feet on the south slde of Romneya Drive
and 472 feet on [he west side of Euclld Street;6 to construct a 120-unit.apartment
complex wiih watvers of minimum floor area and required enclosure of carports on
portion B identifted as a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 5.0 acres having a frontage of approximately 455 feet on the south side
of Romneya Drive, having a maxtmum depth of 472 fee[ and being located approxlmately
365 feet west of the centerline of Euclid Street; and does hereby approve the
Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report
on the basis that there woutd be no signiftcant tndtvidual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the approval of this Negailve Declaratlon since the
Anaheim General Plan designates the subJect Fropcrty for commercial professionai land
uses commensurate wlth the proposal; that na sensitlve environmental impacts are
invotved in the proposal; that the I~itial Study submitted by the petTtioner
indicaCes no significant individual or cumulative advcrse environmental impacts; and
that the Negative Declaration substanttating the foregotng findings ts an file in the
Llty of Anahelm Planning Department.
NON, THEREFO~E, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ctty Planning Cortmission
does hereby grant subJect Petitlon for Reclassification and~ by so dofng~ that Title
18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
-2- PC7a-l96
d~~; ;
property from thc RM-1200 (RESIDENTIAL, NULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE and to incorporate said
described property into the CL (COHNERCIAL, LIMITED) lO~IE upon the following
conditions whtch are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of subJect property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anahelm:
1, That sidewalks shail be installed along Euclid Street as required by
the City Engineer and In accordance wich standard plans and specifications on file in
the office of [he City Engineer.
2. That street lighting facilities along Euclid Street and Romneya Drive
shalt be installed prior to final building and zoning Inspections, unless otherwise
approved by the by the Director of Public Utiiities, and in accordanr_e with stand3rd
specifications on file In the office of the Director oF Public Utilitles; and/or that
a bond, certiftcate of deposit, letter of cr~dit, or cash, in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Anahetm, shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
instaltation of the above-mentioned requirements prior to occupancy.
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to [he City of Anaheim
the sum of ninety-five cents ~95L) per front foot along Euclid Street and Romneya
Drive for tree planting purposes.
4. That trash stcrs;A areas shail be providcd in accordance wiih approved
plans on file with the office of the Direc[or of Public 4lorks.
5. That fire hydrants shall be Installed and charged, as required and
determined to be necessary by tfie Chief of the Fire Department. prior to commencement
of structural framing.
6. Tha[ subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
7. That drainage of subJect property shall be dispcsed of in a manner
;at35facLOry to Lhe Ctty Engine~r.
8. In the event that subJer.t ~roper[y is to be dTvided for the purp~sc of
sale~ lease or financing, a parcel map, to record [he approved division of subjec[
property. shall be submTtted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be
recorded tn the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
9. That the owner(s) of subjec[ propt.'ty shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Louncil Policy No. 214) amounting to 5180.00 per 1000 square feet of
buTldtng or 'rraction thereof prior to the lssuance of a building permit.
10. That subjec[ property shall be devetoped substan[ially in acordance
with plans and spectfications on file: wTth the Ctty of Anahetm and marked Exhibit
Nos. 1 through 8; provlded, however, tha[ a six (6) foot high block wall shal) be
constructed along tlie west property itne and that access to the property shall be
p~ovided in accordance with Exhlbit No. 8 specl~ically.
tl. Prior to the i~troductlon of an ordinance rezoning subJect property,
Condi[ton Nos. 2, 3 and 8~ above menttoned~ shall be completed, The provisTons or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the
Planning Commission unless said condttions are complied with within one year from the
date hcreof, or such further tlme as the Planning Cam~issTon may g~ant.
-3- Pc78-t96
~ : ~ ^F
,. ~
12, Tha[ Condltion Nos. 1. 4~ 6, 7 and 10, above me~tioned, shall bc
canplTed with prlor ta final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planntng Commisslon does hereby
find and determine that adoption of thfs Resotution is expressly predlcated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the condttio~s herelnabove se[ forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof. be declared invatid or uncnforceable
by the final Judgment of any court nf canpetent JurisdicCion, then thi: ResolutTon,
and any approvals hereln contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOiEG01NG RESOLUTIOt~ is signed and approved by me this 28th day of
August 1978. ~
HA N~ AN HE y CI PLAP~NING COHMISSION
ATTEST:
-~~ ~° ~~
SECRE7ARY, AtlAHEIH CITY PLANNING LOMNISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF At~AHEIM }
I, Edith L. Harris. Secretary of thc Anaheim City Plann?ng Commission. do
hereby certify that the foregotng resolution Has passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission heid on August 28, 197f3, at 1:'i0 p.m „ by the
Following vote of [he membars thcreof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BAR~~ES. DAVID, HERBST. JOHNSON~ Y.ING, TOLAR
p0E5: COMMISSIOT~ERS: NONE
A65ENT: CONMISSIONERS: LINN
1978.
IN 1JITNE55 11NEREOF, 1 have hereu~~;o sot my hand this 23th day of August
~~,~ ,~.°~~.:.
SECfiETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
-~ Pc78-t96