PC 78-200r~ '
RESOLUTION N0. PC78-200
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM LITY pLANNING COHMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PE0.M17 N0, 1876 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Plan~ing Commission dtd recelve a verified
Petitlon for Cond)tional Use Permit from MENNEN INDUSTRIES, iNL., 2305 Cherry
Industrtal Circle, Long Beach, Lal(fornia, 90805, owner, and KEtTH WESSELS, 1201 East
Riverstde Drive, Fullerton, California 92531, agent, of certain real property
situated tn the Ltty of Anahetm, County of Orange, Statc of California, descrtbed as:
That portion of Lot 34 of Tract No. 4757~ in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded
in book 184, pages 47 a~d ~8 of Mlscellaneous Maps, records of
sald Orange County, described as follows: PARCEL 1: Parcel 3 as
shown on a map recorded in book 47, page 13 of Parcel Maps.
records of said Orange County.
WHEREAS, the City Plannin9 Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on August 28, 197~, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accorda~ce wtth the
provisions of the Anaheim Munlcipal Code, Chapcer 18.03, to hear and c~nsider
evtdence for and ayainst sald proposed conditional use and to inves[igate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
NFIEREAS, said Commission. after due inspection, investtgation and study made
by ttself and in tts behalf, and af[er due consideration cf all evtdence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and de[ermfne the following facts:
1. That the proposed use ts properly one for which a conditlonal use
permTt is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sectton 18.44,050.010 to wi[: to
permlt on-sale alcoholic beverages tn an existing lodge,
2, That the proposed use is hereby gran[ed for a period of etght (8)
years, to expire December 31, 1986 because said ctme period is 9enerally concurrent
with tha lodge'S lease of the butlding.
3. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adJoini~g land uses
and the growth and devclopmen[ of the arca in which it is proposed to be loca[ed.
4. That the size and shape of the site aroposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full developme~t of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace. health, safety, and general welfare of the LitTzens
of the Cf[y of Anaheim.
5. Thac the granting of [he Londitional Use Permlt under the conditions
imposed, if arty, will not be detrimental to [he peace, health, safety and general
Welfare of the Citizens of the Cicy of Anaheim,
6. That no one indicated their presence at said pubilc heartn9 Tn
opposition; and that no correspondence was recetved in opposition to the sub)ect
petitlon.
PC78-200
~- r
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planning Director or his authorized
representat ve has determ ned that the proposed proJect falls withTn the definitlon
of Categorical Exemptions. C)ass 1, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the City of Anahefm
Environc~ental Impact Report Guide)ines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requlrement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE~ E3E iT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission
does hereby grant subJect Petitlon for Conditional Use Permit, upon the followtng
condittons which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subJect property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the Clty of Anahetm:
1. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay to [he City of Anahetm
the sum of thrce and one-half dollars ($3.50) per fronc foot along Ball Road for
street lighting purposes.
2. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay to the City of Anahetm
the sum of ninety-five (95L) per front foat along Ball Road for tree plantTng
purposcs.
3. That subJect properiy shall be developed substantially tn accordance
with plans and specifications on file wlth the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. i
and 2.
4, That Conditiort Nos. 1 and Z, above menttoned, shall be complied wtth
prlor to the commencement of the ac[ivlty authortzed under this resolutlon, or prior
to the time that the buf)ding permit is issued, or Nithin a period of ninety (90)
days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning
Commission may gran[.
5. That Condition No, 1, above mentioned, shall be complied wtth prlor to
flnal building and zontng inspecttons.
6. That this Conditional Use Permit shall be granted for a period of elqht
~8) Years, to ezpirr_ December 31~ 1pO6, -
BE IT FURTFiER RESOLVED that the An:.hetm Clty Planning Commission docs hereby
find and determfne that adoption of [his Resolution Is expressly pred(cated upon
appllcant's compliance with each and ali of the condittons herelnabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be d~,:lared invalid or unenforceable
by the finai judgment of any court of competen: ,jurisdiction, then this Resolution~
and any approvals herein contained, shal) be deemed null and votd.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUT~ON is signed and appr ved by me this 28th day of
August 1978.
~
ATTEST: ` A ~:-`-~ ~ C T PLANNING LOMNISSION
SECRETAR ~ ANANE.~ CITY p qNNiNG COMMISSI~,~
'Z' PC78-200
•` ~ r
~ ( {...1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF OR/1NGE } ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
1, Edlth L. Har;is, Secretary of the Anaheim Ctty Planning Lummisston, do
hereby certlfy that the foregoing resolutton was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commtssion heid on August 28, 1978. at 1:30 p.m.~ by the
followtng vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIOIiERS: BARNES, DAVID, HERBST, JOHIiSON, KING
NOES: COMHISSIONERS: NOI~E
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LINN, TOLAR
IN WITNESS NHERE6F, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of August
197a.
~~ ~ ~~
SELRETARY, ANAHEIH CITY PLANNING CO;iMIS510N
-3- PC78-200