PC 78-205RESOLUTION N0. PC78-205
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANANEIM CITY PLANNING LOPiMIS510N
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMiT N0. 1863 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Ci1:y Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Londitinnal Use Permit from COLLINS IIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 1077 West Ball
Road, Anaheim, California, 92802,. owner, and L015 M, fNM01lT, 25~6 Ames Avenue,
Anaheim, California 92806, agent. of certain real proper[y situated in the City of
Anaheim, Cpunty of Orange, State of California, described as:
Begfnning at a point on the South li~e of West Broadway which said
point is 40 feet South of a point which (s 132.Sa feet East of a
cement monumenc marktng the Northrrest corner of Lot G7 of "Anaheim
Extension," as shown on a Map of Survey made by 41m. Hamel and
filed for record wtth the County Recorder of Los An9eles County,
California, said poin[ being the intersection of thc South line of
West Broadrray with the Nest line of Adams Street, running thence
South 0° 10' West along the Nest line of Adams S[reet and the
con[inuation thereof 455.75 feet to the South line of [he tract of
land conveyed to the Anaheim Manufac[uring Canpany by deed
recorded November 12th, 1920 in Book 378, pagc 3°~ of Deeds;
thence South 86~ 57' Nest along said South li~e 100.t~0 feet to a
point on the East line of the right of Nay of the Los Alamitos
Branch of the Sou[hern Pactf(c Railway; [hence Nor[h 0° 09' West
alo~g said East line 248.44 feet to a point and continuing along
satd right of way line on a curve Northeastcrly with a radfus of
352.25 feeC to an intersec[fon on the South line of satd Broadway
Street; thence North 68° 55' East along said South line 34.~4 feet
to [he point of beginning.
WHEREAS, [he City Planning Commisston did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on August 28, 5978, at 1:30 p.m.. r.otice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provislons of the Anaheim Muntcipal Code, Chapter 18.03. Co hear and conslder
evTdence for and again~t said proposed condttlonal use and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations In connection therewith; and
HHEREAS~ said Commissio~, af[cr due tnspectton, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of ali evidence and reports
oPfered at said hcaring~ does find and detcrmine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Lode Section 18.61.050.39o to wit: to
permit on-sale beer and wine tn an existing restaurant.
2. That the proposed use is hereby granted for a two-year period to
determine whether the use has had a detrlmenCal affect on adjoining and nearby uses,
subJect to review for consideratlon of posslble extensions oF time.
3, That the petitlon tndtcated that the hours of operation will typically
be 10:00 o'clock a.m. [0 9:00 o'clock p.m, daiiy.
PC78-205
4, That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adJointng land uses
and the growth and development of the area in wfiich it is proposed to be located.
5. Tha[ the size and shape of the sitc proposed for the use 15 adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use ln a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to Che peace~ health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the granting af the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrlmental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the Clty of Anaheim,
7, That no one indicated their presence at sald public hearing in
oppositlon; and that no correspondence was received In opposition to the subject
petttion.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: ihe Planning Director or his authorized
representative has de[ermined that the proposed proJect falls within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined ln Pa~agraph 2 of the CTty of Anahcim
Environmental Impact Report Guidelines and Ts, therefore, categortcally exempt from
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Corre~ission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permi[, upon the fo3lowing
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite [o the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of thc City of Anaheim:
1, That subject property shall be devalooed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
and 2.
2, That the use is granted for a two (2) year period of time subject [o
consideration for possible time extensions upon written request by the petitloner.
BE IT FU°THER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ctty Pla~~l~q Commtssion does hereby
find and determtne that adoption of th(s Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's comptiance with each and ail of the condittons hereinabove set forth.
Should a~y such condition, or a~y part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final Judgment of any court of competen[ jurisdictlon, then this Resolutton,
and any approvals hereln contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE fOREG0ING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 28th day of
August 1978.
1 1~, A~ E ! LANNING CONMISSION
ATT~ST:
~,~rL ,~ ~~~
SECRETAR , ANAHEIM LI'~Y LANNINS COMMISSIOId
_Z_ PC7II-205
'•r
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUN7Y OF ORANGE ) ss,
C ITY Of ANAHE 1~4 )
I. EdTth L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commisston, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolutlon was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planntng Commission held on August 28, 1978, at 1:30 p,m „ by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ DAVID~ HERBST~ JOHNSON, KING, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: tiONE
ABSENT: COM111SSIONERS: LINN
IN WIT~~ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of August
i978.
~~•~i d ~a~LL.r..~.
ECRE AR , ANAHEIN CITY PtANNING CONNISSION
~
-3- PC78-205
^ :. .