PC 78-208RESOLUTIOti N0. PL78-20a
A RESOLUTIOH OF Tt1E ANANEIM CITY PLAN1i14G CONNISStOt~
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATIOPJ N0. 78-79~5 BE GRANTED,
NNEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Cor~mission did receive a verlfied
peti[ion for Reclassification from ANAHEIM HILLS, INC., 360 Anaheim Hills Road~
Anaheim~ Caltfornla 92807, owner of ccrtain real property situaced In the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, descrlbr.d as follows:
That porito~ of the land ailotced to Paula Peraita Dominquez as
descrtbed In the ~'innl Decree of Pareition of the Rancho Santiago
dc Santa Ana~ which was entered in Book "B" pa9e 410 of Judgments
of the 17th ~udicial Dlstrict Court in and for los Angeles Coun[y,
5tate of Lalifornia in the Ci[y of Anaheim. County of Orange,
described as follorrs: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of
Tract No. 8533 as recorded in Book 3:'3. pa9es l+7-1+? of
Miscellaneous Maps, records of said countv, sa1J point beina also
the southcrly terminus of tha[ course in the boundary of satd map
ha~ing a bearing of North 10° 39' 48" East and a leng[h of 38E.90
feet; thence westerly along the southerly boundary of saicf tract
South 8E° 5Q~ ~+4" Wes[ 327.31 feet; thence leaving said boundary,
throuqh the following courses and distances [o the souchscesterly
corner of Lot 21 of said tract; South 6 0 33' 14" Vest 102.°9 feet,
South 4G ° ZS' 00" Nest 104.0o feet, 1lorth 83° 53' 2I~" uest 63,69
feet. t~orth 75° 05' 00" 11est G0.00 fcet. !lorth 4° 25' 00" Hest
20.OQ feet, North 54~ 10' 00" L+est 55.0~ feet. North 44° 2$' 49"
East T6.40 feet, North 7~ 01' 40" East 84,40 feet; thence
northwesteriY along thc southwesterly Iinc of said Lot 21 ~torth 29a
55' 01" Nes[ ?8.8G feet to the most eas[erly corner of Lo[ 16 of
Tract No. 7569 as recorded 1n Book 31b, pages it-14 of
Htscellane~us Maps, records of said county; thence alon9 Lhe
southerly boundary of ~aid Traec No. 7c5q Soufh ~^O ~h~ 5~" `efest
179.00 feet; thence South 880 5°' 44" West 937.40 feet; thence
Horth 6~ 02' 27" liest 144.32 feet to a point in a curve concave
northwesterlY, and having a radius of 377,fl0 feet, a radlal to
said curve at said point benring South 50~47' 11" Eas[; thence
southwesterlY along the arc of sald curve 328.00 feet through a
cen[ral angie of 49° S1' 38"; thenc~ fangent to safd curve South
8Ao 04' 27" West 21?.09 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve.
concave southerly, a~d having a radius of 373,00 feet; [hence
Westerly along the arc of said curve 46.21 feet [hrough a central
angle of 7° OS' S5" to the r,rost northerly zorner of Lot 29 of
Tract No. 7567 as recorded tn Book 340, pages 41-G3 of
Mis~ellaneous tlaps. records of said county, a radiai to said curve
at said northerly corner bear(ng North 8~ Oi 28" West; thence
leaving the boundary of saTd Tract No. 7568 and folloNing the
bound~ry of said Tract No. 7567. South 8~ pl' 22" East 7.75 feet;
thence south 12b.50 feec. thence South 72~ 55' 39" West 63.38 feet
to the most easterly corner of tha[ certaTn Parcel Nap recorded (n
Book 78. p~4e 33 of Parcel Maps of sald Orange County; thence
along the southeasterly boundary of sald Parccl Map through the
follrn+ing courses and distances [o the mosc easterly cor•ner of lot
~+G of Tract No. 9268 as recorded in Book ~13, pages 1-il of
PC18-208
~ .%
Miscellaneous Maps. records of said county; South 50 OP' 30" West
41.88 feet, South 50 14~ 36" West 76.58 feet, South 46 08' 17"
West 74.85 feet, South 80 47' 10" West 141.54 feet; thence
folloi~ing the southeasterly boundary of said Tract IJo. 9268, South
6° 59' 02" West 254.14 feet; thence SouLh 58° 07' 02" Nest 194,00
feet; thence South 4G~ 10' lE" 41est 257.00 feet; thence leaving
the boundary of satd Tract ~~o. g268, South 1 17' 1F4" West 251.G4
feet; thence South 39~ h9' 00" East 585.59 feet; thence North 890
47' 40" East 807.09 feet; thence South 17° 24' 35" East 53.00 feee
to a point in a curve concave southerly, and havtng a radius of
1000 feet, a radlal to said curve at said poinC bearing North 17°
24' 35" West; thence Easterly along said curve an arc length of
117.Q0 feei through a central angle of 6~ 42' 13"; thence tangent
to said curve Nor[h 79° 17' 38" East 646.20 feet [o the beginning
of a tange~t curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of
1200 feet; the.nce northeasterly along said curve an arc length of
1437.40 feet through a central angle of 68° 37' S0"; thence
tan9ent to said curve Narth 10° 39' 48" East 52b.00 feet to [he
point of begfnning.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did schedule a public
hearing at tfie City Hall !n the City of Anahetm on July 3, 1978, at 1:30
P.m., notice of said public hearing having be~n duly 9iven as required by
law and in accordance with the provlsions of the Anaheim Municipal Code,
Chapter tII.03, to hear and conslder ev(dence for and agalnst said proposed
reclassification and to inves[igate and make ftndings and recommendations
in connection therewith; saici public hearing having been continued to [he
Planning Commtssion me~ting of August 28, 1978, at 7:00 p.m,; and
NHERE115, said Commission after due inspectian~ i~vestigation and
study made by iiself and in its behalf, and after due considcration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
followin9 facts:
i, That the peti[ioner proposes reclassificatton of subject
property from the R5-A-43,000 (SG) (Reside~tial/Agricultural-Scenic
Corridor Overlay) and County A-t (General Agricultural) Zones to the RS-HS-
10,000(SC) (Resldential, Single-Far..ily-N(liside-Scenfc Corrldor Overlay)
Zone,
2, That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for
low-density residential land uses and general open space.
3. That the proposed reclassificatcton of subJect property is necessary
and/or desirable for th:: orderly and proper development of the cortvnunlty.
~, That the proposed reclassiftcation of subjec.~ property does properly
relate to the zones and thetr permitted uses locally established in close proximity
ta subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally estabilshed
throughout the communtty.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subJect property requires the
dedication and tmprevement of abutting streets tn accordance with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, due to the antl~tpated increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensificatton of land use.
-2- PC78-208
'i 1^
!
'. !
6. That approximately 64 persons indicated their presence at said pub)tc
hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the
subJect petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That thc Anahetm City Planning Conmission
does hereby n that IR t~o. 21 or the proposed development of Tentative Tract
Nos, 10407, 10408, 10409 and 10410, consisting of ili~~ single-f.amity homes, having
been considered this date by the Anaheim City Planning Ca~mission and evidence, both
written and oral, having been presented to supplement draft EIR No. 21(i, finds that
potential proJect-generated envlronmental imoacts have been reduced to an acceptable
level by conformance with City plans, policies and ordinances and draft EiR No. 218
is in conpllance with the Callfornla Envtronm~ntai Quality Act anc! City and State
Guidelines; therefore, based upon such fnformation, the Anahetm Ctty Planning
Commission does hereby certtfy Eift No. 218.
I~OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plann(ng Comrnlssfon
does h~reby grant subJect Pe[ition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
1$-Zoning of the Anaheim 1lunicipai Code be amended to exclude [he above-described
property from the RS-A-43,000(SC) (RESIUENTIAL/AGRILUL?URAL-SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY)
and County A-1 (General Agriculturai) Z~NES and to incorporate sald described
property into [he RS-HS-10,00(SC) (RESIDEt~TIAI, SIHGLE-FNIILY-HIILSIDE SCENIC CORRIDOR
OVERLAY) 20NE upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequis(te to [he proposed use of subject property in order to oreserve the safety
and general welfare of the CJiizens of the C{ty of Anaheim:
1. That ftre hydrants shall be installed and charged, as requlred and
determined [o be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department, prior to commencement
of structural framing,
2. That subJect property shall be served by under9round utilities.
3. In the even[ that subjec[ ~roperty is [o be divided for the purpose of
saie, lease or financing~ a parcel map, to record the approved division of subject
property, sha)i be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be
recorded in the Offtce of the Orange County Recorder.
4, That the owner(s) of subject property shal; pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and r~creation in-licu `ees as determined to be appropriate by
the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
5. That these reclassification proceedtngs are granted subject to
completlon of annexation of subject property Co the City of Anahelm.
6. That the ordinances rezoning [he subjec[ property shall in no event
become effective except upon or foliowtng the recordatio~ of each of the final Tract
Map Nos. 1040~, 10408, 10409 and 10410 within th2 time specified in Government Code
Section 66463.5, or such further time as the advisory agency or City Louncil may
grant.
7. That the developers of subject property shall pay the trafffc signal
assessment fee (Council Policy No. 214) amounting to $36,00 per each new dwelling
unit prior to the issuance of a building permit.
ConditionBNos.P3jand 6~ above mentioned,~nshalln bedtcompletedonj"Theubprovisionsrtor
"3' PC78-208
' i ~
rights granted by this resotutian shall become null and void by actio~ of the
Planning Commission uniess said conditions are complied with within one year from the
date hereof~ or such further time as the Planning Commisston may grant.
9. That Conditlon PJo. 2, abovc menttoned~ shall be complied with prior to
final building and zoning inspections.
8E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Re~olution is expr~ssly predicated upon
appllcanC's compliance with each and all of the condltlons herelnabove set forth.
Should any such conditton, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final Judgment of any court of competent Jurisdiction, then this Resolutton,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 2$th day of
August i978.
RtiAll, A tfc C 1 TY PLANN I NC, COMM I 55 I OIJ
ATfEST:
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUIJTY OF ORAIJGE ) ss.
CITY Of ANAtIEIM )
f, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim Gity Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that ihe foregoing resolution rras passed and adop[ed a[ a meettng of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 28, 1978, at 7:00 p.m., by [he
following vote of the members thcreof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: E3ARNE5, DAVID, HERBST. KiNG, TOLAk
NOES: COHMISSIONERS: JOHNSON
ABSENT: COf1Mi5510NERS: IINN
~978.
IN WlTNESS 4fHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of August
`~~~ ~ -° ~,
SECRETARY~ ANAHEiM CITY PLANNING COHMISSI0~1
-4- Pt78-2o8