PC 78-212fl ~
1
RESOLUTION N0. PC78-212
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHElM CI1'Y PLANNING CGHNISSI~N
THAT PETiTION FOP, RECLASSIFICATION N0. 78-79-13 BE GRAPITED.
WHEREAS, [he Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petitlon for Rec.lassification from ELAINE B. L04JRY, WILLIAM J. STEINBORN At1D JOHN C.
STEIPlBORPI, JR., 1008 East Broadway, Anaheim, California Q2805, owner~ and JAMES L.
BARISIC, 825 South Western Avenue, Los Angeles, Catifornfa 90022, aqent, of certain
real property sltuated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as fol'ows:
Lots 2 and 3 in Dlock E, Lorelei Trac[, in the City of Anaheim~ as
sho~m on a map thereof recorded in book 29, page 24, Miscellaneous
Records of Los Angsles County, California.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Cortsmission did schedule a public hearing at the
City Hall in the Cfty of Anaheim on August 28, 1978, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing havtng been duly given as required by law and in accorda-+ce with the
provtsions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18,03, to hear and consider
evtdence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and reco~suunendations in connection therewith; said public hearing having been
continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 11, 197$; and
WHEREAS, said Commission after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its bchalf, and after due consideration o4 all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and de[ermine thc followTng facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from
the RN-240Q (Residential, Multiple-family) Zone to the RM-1200 (Residential~
1lultipie-Family) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Pian designates subiect pro~erty for medium-
density restdential land uses.
3, That the proposed reclassf`icaLion of subJecL properLy is rtecessary
and/or desir~ble for the orderly and proper development nf thc community.
k. That the proposed reclassificatlon of subJect properiy does properly
relate to the zones and [heir permlt[ed uses locally established in close proxtmity
to subJect property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout Lhe cormunity.
5. That the proposed reclasstftcation of subJect property requlres ths
dedication and improvement of abutti~g streets in accordance with the Ctrc~la[ion
E?ement of the Gensral Plan, due to the anticipated i~crease in traffic which will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said p~blic heartng in
oppositlon; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
EI~VIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anahetm City Planning Commtssion has
reviewed thc praposal to reclassi y subject property from the RM-2400 (Resfdential~
PC78-212
i f
MultTple-Family) to the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone to construct a
10-unit apartment complex on a rectangularly-sfiaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 0.3 acre, having a frontage of appraximately 100 feet on Yhe south side
of Broadway, havin9 a maximum depth of approximately 134 feet, being locat~d
approximately 80 feet east of the centerline of Bush Street; and does hereby approve
the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental Tmpact
report on the basis that there arould be no significant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since
the Anaheim General Plan desi9~ates the subJect property for medium-density
residential land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive envtronmental
impacts are invalved in the proposal; thai the Initial Study submitted by the
petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmentat
impacts; and that the Negative Declaratio~ substanttatTng the foregoing findings (s
on file In the City of Anaheim Ptanntng Departmen[.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ct[y Planning Commission
does hereby grant subJect Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Titte
18-Zonin9 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amendPd to exclude the above-described
property from ihe RH-2400 (RESIDEtlTIAL. MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE and to incorporate said
described property into the RM-1200 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-fANILY) ZONE upon [he
following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of subJect proper[y in order to preserve the safety and general welfare
of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
ptans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the ~raffic signal
assessment fee {Council Policy No. 214) amour.tin9 to $36.00 per each new dwelling
unit prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3. Thai Conditlon No. 1, above-mentiuned, shall bc complied with prlor to
final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the pnaheim CTty Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance wtth each and all ef the cond(tions herelnab~ve set forth.
Should any sucli conditlon, or any par[ thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment oi' any court of competent Jurisdiction, then this Resolutton,
and any approvals herein contained, ~hall be deemed null and void.
7HE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approve by me this 11th day of
September, 197II. ~
. ~
A AN~ Af~A Ef~ C L ~ING COMMlSSION
ATTEST:
~i L.A~- ~ 6Y-Qil/ua.
SELRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY LANNING COMHISSI~N
-2- Pt78-212
.
( s ?
~
;
~
;STATE Of CALiFORN1A )
~COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
i. Edith L. Harrls, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commisston, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resoiution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim Ctty Planning CommTsston held on September 11, 1978 at 1:30 p,m., by the
following vote of [he members thereof:
AYES: CONMISSIONERS: BARNES, DAVID, HERBST~ KING, TOLAR
NOES: COHMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JONt~50N
VRCANY: Ot~E SEAT
IN WITNESS ;JHEREOF, t have hereunto set my hand this ilth day of September,
1978.
~d.~ .~ ~~.
SELRETARY~ A~IANEIM GIT FLANI~ING GOMMISSION
_3_ Pt78-2i2