PC 78-213RESOLUTION N0. PC78-213
A RESOLUTIO~~ OF Tf1E ANAHEIN CITY PLAN~IING CONHISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIOHAL USE PERMIT N0, 1879 BE GRANTEA
WHEREAS, the Anahcim City Piann(ng Commission dtd receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from EQUITEC 77 REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, 3732 Mount
Diabto Boulevard, Lafayette, California, 94549, owner, and ~~. ARTHUR ASTOR AND DON
BERRIGAN~ 1278 East Katelia Avenue, Anaheim, Californfa 92805, agent, of certatn real
property situated in [h~ City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Calffornta,
descrtbed as:
That portton of the Northeas[ quarter of Section 2L-, Township 4
South, Range 10 West in the Rancho San Juan CaJon de Santa Ana, as
shown on a Map recorded in book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps,
records of Orange Lounty. California, described as follows:
Parcel 1, as sho~m on a Hap recorded in book 81, page 32 of Parcet
Ptaps in the office of the County Recorder of said Orange County.
4JHEREAS, the City Planning Gommission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in tlie City of Anaheim on September it, 1~78, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Lhapter 18,03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditionai use and [o investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WtiEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its befialf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered a•t said hearTng, does Find and determine the following facts:
i. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Hunicipal Code Section 18.61.05~.050 and
18.61.054.070 to wtt: to permit an auto sates, repair and restoration facility in
the ML (Industrial, Limited} Zone.
2. That the proposed use is hereby granted for a one year pertod, ,ubJect
to review and consideration by the Planning Commission for possible extensions of
time upon written request from the petitioner to determine whether the use is being
conducted as represented at thc publtc hearing and whether the use has had a
detrimental effect on [he surrounding area.
3. That the proposed use is hereby granted subJect to the petitioner's
stipulation that all work wTll be conducted whoily within a building and that there
will be no outdoor storage or display of vehicles. Furthcr, that the petittoner
stipulated that 85~90$ of his actlvities conducted at this loca[ion is the
restoration and repairing of antique and classic automobiles (primarily 19~5 and 1966
Ford-Mustan9s), and 10-15~ of his activttles would constttute autumobile sales.
4. Tha[ the proposed use will not adversely affect the adJolning land uses
and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located,
5. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequa[e to
allcwr the full developme~t of the proposed use in a rnanner not detrimental to the
PC78-213
particular area nor to the peace~ healch, safety, a~d general welfare of the Litizens
of the Ci~y of Anaheim.
6. That the grantTng of the Condltional Use Permit under the condltions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anahetm.
7, That no one indt=ated their presence at said public heartng in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received tn oppasitlon to [he subJect
petttion.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDIIIG: The Planning ~irector or his authorized
representat ve has determ ne that the proposed project falis within the definition
of Categoricat Exemptions, Class 1, as deftned in Paragraph 2 of the Ctty or Anaheim
Environment~l Impact Report Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt fram
the requirement to prepare an EER.
NOW, TtfEREFORE, BE 17 RESOLVED [hat the Anaheim City Pl~nning Commission
does hereby 9rant subJect Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to pre~erve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
i, That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee difference between industrial and commerclal use a[ 5150.00 per 5000
squa~e feet of builcling or fraction thereof.
2, That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specafications on file vri[h the Clty of Anaheim marked Exhtblt Nos. 1
through 3.
3, That Condition tlo. 1, above-mentloned, shall be complled with prtor [o
the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to the
time that the buildin9 permit is issued, or rrithin a period of [hirty (30) days from
date hereof, whichever occurs firs[, or such further time as the Planning Commiss~on
may grant.
4, That Condition No. 2, above-mentioned, shail be canplied wlth prior to
final 'ouilding and zont~g inspections.
5, That therc will be no outdoor storage or display of automoblles.
6. That all work shall be conducted whoily wlthin a building.
7. That the use is granted for a per(od of one year, subJect to review and
consideratton by the Pianning Larmisslon for possible extensions of time upon wrttten
request from the petitioner to determine whether the use has had a detrtmental effect
on the surroundi~g industrial area.
BE IT FURTHEP. RESOLVED ehat the Anahelm City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicaced upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condiCton, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the ftnal Judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
-2- PC78-2~3
. 4. J
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this ilth day of ';,
September, 1978.
A MA , A~AN L i.IN ONM SION t
~ i
ATTEST:
~ ~.~. ~ ~
SECRETARY, ANAHEiM CI Y PLANNiNG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNlA
COUN7Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Narris~ Secretary of the Anaheim Lity Pla~ning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
Che Anaheim City Planning Caronission h~ld on September 11, 1978 at 1:30 p.m•, by the
followin~ vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COHMISSIONERS: BARNES, DAVID, HERBST, KltlG~ TOLAR
NOES: COHMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JOHtI50N
VACANY: ON: SEAT
IN WITNESS WtiEREOF~ ! have hereunto set my hand this lith day of September.
t97II.
-~ , .1° ?~
SECRETARY, AtJA EIM CITY PLANNING LOMMISSION
-3- Pt78-2t3