PC 78-220J -
RESOLUT~OH N0, PC78-220
A RESOLUTION OF TNE ANANEIM CITY PLANNING CO"'115510N
THl1T PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PEP,tiIT N0. 18$6 BE GRP.NTED, IN PART
NHEREAS, the Anahefm City Ptanning Commtssion did ~ecelvc a verifled
Petitton for Conditlonal l;sc Pcrmit from KALYANJt Y.. MOTA~ 2~12 Uest Lincoln Avanu~~
Anahelm, California °2801, owner of certain real property s(tuaced in the Gity of
Anaheim, County of Orange, Statc of California, described as:
The Easteriy 95.OD feet of the southerly 330.00 fee[ of the
northerly 396.00 feet of that portion of the norihwest quarter of
section 13, Township 4 Sou[h. Range 11 Nest, in the Rancho Los
Goyotes, City of Anaheim, Coun[y of Orange, State of California~
as per map recorded in book 51 pa9e it of Miscellaneous Maps.
records of said county. described as follows: Be9i~ning at a
point on the north line of said section, North 89a 41' 15" East
1162.30 feet from the northwest corner thereof; thence South C~
10' S5" East 1;38.22 feet to a point on the south line of the
north half of [he nor[hwest qu~rter of said sec[ton, North 89° 37'
30" East 11G2.58 feet from the in[ersection of sald ?'.ie with thc
wesE linc of said sec[ion; thencc South 89° 37' 30" ~lesi 134.53
feet along said south ;ine; thence north Oo iJ' 15" West 133a.45
feet parallel with the west line of said section to the ~~orCh Ilne
thereof; thence North $9n 41' 15" East 184.30 fee[ to the point of
beginning. EXCEPT the westerly 3.OD fe~t of the southP~!y 230.00
feet thereof.
WFIEREAS, the Ci[y Planning Commission did schedule a pubifc hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim on September 11. l?78, at 1:30 p.m., notlce of said
public hearing having been duly given as required 6y law and in accordance wtth the
provisions of the Anaheirn Hunicipai Cade, Lhap[er i$.03, [o hear anJ consider
evidence for and against said proposeu condltional use and to investigate and make
findings and recommenda[ions in connection therewith; said pubiTc hearing havtng been
continued to the Planni~g Commission meeti~g of September 25. 197~; and
WNEREAS~ said Commission, after due inspection, inves;ioation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideratton of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find a~d determine the following facts:
1. That the use Is properly one for which a conditional usa permtt is
authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 16.44.050.160 to wtt: to permit
expansion of a motel with waiver of:
Section 18,44.063.040 - Maximum structurat setback.
10 eet required rom Rlt-1200 zoning;
2~eei proposed)
2, That the proposed waiver is hereby denicd on the basis that there are
no unique circumstances applicable to this property and that the petitioner
stTpulated at thc public hearing to abide by the Code requirements for minimum
structural setb~ck by decreasing the number of units and that revtsed plans will be
PC78-220
;"
~~
sub:nitted to the Planntng Commission for thcir review and approval prlor to the issuance
of buTidin9 permits.
3, That the proposed use. as granted, will not advcrsely affect [hc
adJoining land uses and thc qrow[h and developmen[ of tt~e arca in which it is
proposed to be located.
4. That the si•.e and shape of [hc site proposed for the use, as granted,
is adequatc to allow the f~ll developr~ent of thc proposed use in a ma~ner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to thc pcace, health, safecy. and general
welfare of the Citizens r,f the City of Anahetm.
5, Tha[ the Condi[ional Use PernTt, as granted~ and under the condittons
imposed. will not be detrimcntal to the peacc~ heal[h. safety and general wclfare of
the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. Tha[ no on- indicated [heir presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
ENVIROIIMEt~TAI iMPACT FINDING: That th~ Anaheln City Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal to reclassify the prooerty from the RS-A-43,000
(Residential/Agricultural) to che CL (Corm~erciai. Limited} zone to expand a mo[el
with a rfaiver of maximum structural setbac4 on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land
consisting of approximatcly 0.7 acre, having a froncagc of approximately 95 feet on
the south side of Lincoln Avcnuc, having a naximum dca[h of approxinately 330 feet
being located approximatelv 1060 feet ease of the centerline of Beach Boulevard; and
does hcreby approve thc Negative Declaration from the requlrement to prepare an
environmental impact repor[ on the basis that there would be no stgnifican[
individual or cumulative adverse environmentai impact due [o the approval of this
Negative Declara[ion since the Anaheim General Plan desianates the subJect property
for general cortmercial land uses cormiensurate with [he proposal; that no sensitive
envtronmentat impacts are invofved in tf~e proposai; that the ini[iai S[udy submiCGed
by thc pctttioncr indicates no significant individual ~r cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and [hat the Negative Oeclaratio~ substanttafing the foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Departmen[.
NOW~ TNER[fORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commfssion
docs hereby grant, in part, suhJect Petitton for Conditional Use Permit, upan the
followin9 conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequlsite to the
proposed use of the subjec[ property in order to preserve the safety and general
weifare of [he Ci[izens of the City of A~aheim:
1. That this Conditional Use Permi[ is granted subject to the comptetion
of Reclassification No. 78-79-12, now pe~ding.
2. That the orm er(s) of subject property shall pay the cor•merctal traffic
signal assessment fee (Council Poticy No, 214} amounting to 5180.00 per 1000 square
fe~.t of the bullding or fraction thereof prior [o the issuance of a building permlt.
3. That subJect property shall be developed in accordance Hith plans and
spccifications on fite Mith the City of Anaheim marked (Revislon No. 1) Exhibit -10.
1; provided, however, thac kitchen efficiency units with a maximum of 6-cubT:; foot
-2- PC78-220
~
. { t
refrfgerators, two-burner stoves, excludtng oven and baking facilitfes, :and single
compartment stnks may be installed~ excep[ that the manager~s uni[ will be allowed to
have full kitchen facilitles; and provtded that development shall be in fut!
accordance Ntth all applicable "CL" Commercial, Limi[ed stanrzrds, including
structural se[back.
4, That revised plans shall bc submiLted for Planninct Commission review
and approval prior to the issuance of buliding permfts, s~id plans showing the
necessary reduction in the number of uni[s [o co~ply with the setback reauJrements of
thc City of Anaheim Codc.
BE 1T FURTHEP. RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commisston does hereby
find and detcrmine that adop[lon of this Resolu[ion is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set iorth.
Should any such condition, or any part chereof, be declared tnvalid or unenforceable
by the final judgmen[ of any courc of competen[ )urisdi~tion, then this Resolution,
and any approvals hercin contained~ shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOtJ is signed and approved by ne this 25ch day of
September, 197s.
A ti H, ANAfi i T ~Itt f tJG CG!'!'S 1 SS I ON
ATT[ST:
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLFiNfllt~G GONHISSIOH
STATE OF CALlFORt~IA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANANEIM )
I. Edtth L. Harrts, Secretary of the Anahetm Ctty Planning Commission, do
hereby certlfy that the foregoing resolution was posscd and adopted at a meeting of
the Anahcim City Planning Commission held on September 25. 1978 at 1:30 p.m „ by the
following vota of the members thcreof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES. DAVID, HERBST, JONNSON, KING. TOLAR
NOES: LOMMISSIONERS: NOtIE
ABSENT: CO"1MISSIONERS: tJOt1E
VACA~lY: ONE SEAT
1978.
(tt UITNESS WNEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 25th day of September,
~~~~~~~
SECRE7ARY~ ANAMEIM CITY PLAI~NING COMHISSION
-3- Pt78-220