PC 78-226P,ESOLUT1011 ~i0. PC78-226
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIH CITY PIANNIN~ COt1H155104
TtiAT PETIT I Ot~ FOR COt1D IT IONAL IJSE PEP,M IT ~(0. 1~'89 BE GRP.NTED, I N PART
WHEREAS. the Anaheim Ci[y Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Co~ditional Use Permit from D~IE E. At~D SAPJIH AtIH FONLER, 3178 EasC La
Palma Avenue, Anaheim, Lalifornla, 92806, owncrs, and CREVIER INPORTS, 1NC., 1016-H
Shepard Street, Anaheim, California 92806, agent, of certain real property situated
in the Ctty of Anaheim, Coun[y of Orange, Statc of California, described as:
That portion of Lot 20 in Block K of the Kra~ncr 7ract, as shawn
on a Map recorded in book 12, p~ges 7a and 88 of Miscellaneous
Records of Los Angeles County, California, descrtbed as follews:
Parcel No. 2 as shown on a Map filed in book 55, page -+7 of Parcel
Maps in the office of the County Recorder of Qrange County,
California.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anahelm on September 25. ~978, ~t ~~3G p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of che Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed condi[tonal use and [o investigate and make
findings and reca~nmenda[ions in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Lommisslon, after duc inspec[ion, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1, That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 1II,61.050.050 and
18.61.050.070 to wft: to permit an automobile sales, service and restoration
facility.
2. That the proposed use ls hercby granLed, in part, to permtt a service
and ~estoration facili[y for Ferrari and Maserati automobiles only, for a period of
[wenty (ZO) months, to expire May 22, 1980. with possible time extensions, but
prohibfting any sale of automobiles; and subject to [he petitioner's stipulation that
all work and storage will be conducted wholly Inside the building.
3. That tfie proposed use, as granted, wilt ~ot adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth and developmert[ of the area in which it is
proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use, as granted,
is adequate to allov+ the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrTmentai to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Ci[izens of the City of Anaheim.
$, That the Condttional Use Permit, as granted, and under the conditions
imposed, wilt not be de[rtmc~tal to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of
the Citizens of the City of Anahetm.
PC78-226
'. i
6. That no one tndicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposi[ton; and that no correspondence rias received in oppositlon to the subJect
petition.
ENVIROIIMEtiTAL IMPACT FINDING: 7rie Planning Director or his authortzed
representative as determ ned that the proposed pro,ject falls within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined tn Paragraph 2 of the City of Anaheim
Environmental Impact Report Gufdelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from
Che requirement to prepare an EIR,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLI~ED that the Anahelm City Planning Commissfon
does hereby granc, in part, subject Pe[Ition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the
following condtttons which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisi[e to [he
proposed ~se of [he subject property ln order to preserve the safety and general
welfare of the Citlzens of the Ctty of Anaheim:
1. That sidetioaiks shall be installed along La Palm~ Avenue and Shepard
Street as requfred by the C(ty Engineer and in accordanr_e with standard plans and
specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer,
2. That the owncr(s) of subject property shall pay to [he City of Anahelm
the sum of 95 cents per front foot along La Palma Avenuc and ShFpard S[reet for tree
planting purposes.
3. That the owner(s) of subjec[ property shall pay the traffic eignai
assessment fee difference (per Council Policy t~o. 214) betwee~ industrial and
comnercial ~se at S150.00 per 1000 square foot of butlding ar fraction thereof,
4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specttications on file o-~i[h the Lity of Anaheim :;ia~rked Exhlhit t2os. 1
through 3,
5. That Condition t~os. 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be compiled with
prtor to the commencement of the ac[ivi[y authorfzed under this resolution, or prior
to che time that Lhe buildir,g permit is issued, or withfn a pertod of one year from
date hereof, whichever occurs flrst, or such further time as the Plannfng Commissi~n
may grant.
6. That Conditton Nes. 1 and 4, above-mentioned. shal~ be complied wi~th
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
7. That there shall be no sales of automobTles on thc subJect property.
8. That all work on a~d storage of autanobiles shall be conducted whally
inside the bulldfng.
9. Tha[ the use, as granted, is permitted for a pertod of approxtmately
twenty (20) month~ to explre May 22, l9go unless an exte~sion of time is granted in
conJunction wi[h Conditlonal Use Permit I~o. 1E37. That said time limitation ts to
determPne whether the use has had a detrtmental effect on the area; and that
extenstons of Lime may be granted by the Planning Commission upon written request by
Chc petitioner, following a determination that the use has not had a detrimenia)
effect.
-2- PC78-226
1 t
BE IT PURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the condttiorts hereinabove set forth.
Shouid any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final Judgnent of any court of competent Jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein cont~ined, shall bc decmed null and void.
THE FOP.E60tD16 RESOLUTION is sl9ned and approvcd by me this 25th day of
September, 1978.
1 N, AtlAH Ir 17 P ANtlItJG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
l0 6,CQu ~ ~,~f(i!/~,cu
SECRETARY. ANAHE IM C ITY PLAr~t~ I dG COM!1155 I ON
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COl!`ITY 0~ OR/1fJGE ) ss.
CITY OF At~AHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahetm City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify tha[ the foregoing resolutlon was pas~ec and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim Clty Planning CcNmmission held on September 25, 1978 at 1:3Q p.m., by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COhLMISSI0NER5: BARNES, NERBST~ JOt~NSON, KING, TOLAR
t~OES: COMM I SS I ONERS: DAV I ll
ABSEtlT: COMHISSIO~JERS: NONE
VACAtlY: ONE SEAT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF~ 1 have hereunto set my hand [his 25th day of September,
1978.
~~.~ ~ ~
SECRE7ARY, AtJAHE1M CITY PLANNING COMHISStON
-3- RC18-226