PC 78-229RESOLUTIOtt N0. PC7d-22o
A RESOLUTIOI~ OF Tt~E A~IAHF.I~i CITY PLANt11r1G CONn15510!1
THAT PETITIOU FOR COttDITiO~tl1L USE PERHIT td0, 1E~2 BE GRANTED
WFIEREAS, [he Anaheim City Planning Commission did reccivc a verifted
Petition for Conditional Use Perm(t from EUCLID SHOPPING CEf7TER, 2293 4~est Ball Road,
Anaheim, California, 92804, owner, and WILLIl~N DOtiEP,TY, 14652 Franklin Avenue,
Tus[fn, California 92E80, agent, nf certain real property situated in [he City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Ca)ifornia, descrlbed as:
Parcel 6, in [hc City cf Anaheim, as shown on a map recorded in
book 27, page 41 of Parcel Maps, records of said Orange County.
IJFIEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
l1a11 in [he Ci[y of Anaheim on September 7.5, iQ78, at 1:3~ P•m•, notice of said
public hearing having heen duly given as required by lav~ and in accordance with the
provisions of the AnaheEm Nunicipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and agains[ said proposed conditional use and to inves[igate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Lo;nmission, after due inspection, fnvesttgation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and detcrmi~e the followina fac[s:
t. That the proposed use is properly one for which a condittonal use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Munictpal Code Sec[ion 18.l+4.n5o.2P~ to wit: to
permit racquetball courts ln a health club.
2, That thc proposed use will not adversely affec[ the ad)oining land uses
anJ the growth and devefopment of the area In which it is pr~posed to be located.
3. That thP size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequa[e to
allow the fuii development of the proposed use in a manncr no[ decrimen[al to the
particular area nor Co the peace, health, safecy, and general welfare of the Citixens
of [hc City of Anaheim.
4, That [he granting of [he Condicional Jse Perm1[ under thc conditions
tmposed, if any, wil) not be detrimental to the peace~ heal[h, safety and gcneral
welfare oP the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That no one Indicated their presence at said public hearing in
oppositlon; and tha[ no correspondence r+as received in opposition to the subJect
petition.
ENViRONNENTAL INPACT FINDING: That the Anahetm City Planntng Camnissto~ has
reviewed the proposal [o perm t e even (11) racquetball courts in a heal[h club on an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land co~sisting of approxir,wtely 2.0 acres having a
Pc78-229
frontage of approxlmately 20 fcet on thc seuth side of Y~tella Avenue~ having a
maximum ~n~th of approximately 6Q0 fec[, and br_ing located approxtmately g00 feet
east of [he ce~teritne of Euclid 5[reet; and does hereby approve the Negative
~eclaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the
basis [hat there wouid be no slanificant tndtvidual or cumulative adverse
envtronmentai imaact due to the approval of this ~leqative Declaratton since the
Anaheim Gencral Plan designates thc subject property for acnerai coamercial land uses
commensurate rrith the propos~l; that no sensitive envlronmental inpacts are involved
in the proposal; that the Init~al Study submitted by the petitioncr indTca[es rroo
sign(ficant individual or cumulative adverse environmental tmpaets; and that the
Negative Declaration sub~tantia[ing the foregolnq findings is on fite in the City of
Anaheim Planning Department.
t10u, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVE~ that thc Anahcim Ctty Planning Commtssion
does hereby grant subJect Petition for Conditional Jse Permit, upon the following
condi[ions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subJec[ propcrty tn ordcr to preserve [he safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
i. That fire hydrants shall bc installed and charged as reGuired and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Oepartnent prior to commencement
of structural framing.
2. That the owner(s} of subJect property sholl pay the commercial traffie
slgnal assessment fee (Council Policy No. 214) amounttng to 5180.00 per 1000 square
feet of the building or fraction thercof prior to thc issuance of a building permit.
3. That subject Oroperty shall be develooed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifica[Fons on f?)e with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit tlos. 1
throuah 4.
BE IT FURTHER RESOL~/ED that the Anahetm City Planni~q Con*~ission does herebv
Finti and deter~~~ine that aJoptfon of this Res~lution is expressly predicated upon
appitcane's compllance riith each and al) of the conJitions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such conditfon, or any par[ thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceahle
by the finai judgment of any court of competent jurtsdic[ton~ then this Resotution.
and any approvals herein contatned. shall be deemed nul) and void.
Tf1E FOREGOItIG RESOLUTfO~J Is signed and approve by mc this 25th day of
September, 197$.
A , A CITY Nt11NG COHkI5SI0N
ATTEST:
~6t.[,CK, ~ .
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COHMISSION
-2- PC7II-22n
;
`, . ,.J'
STATE OF CALIFORHIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AtIANEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris~ Secrecary of the Anaheim Lity Planning CammTssTon, do
hereby certify that the foregoJng resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City ?lanning Ccx~misslon held on Septtmber 25, 197E at 1:30 p.m., by the
followtny vo[e of thc membcrs thereof:
AYES: COM415510NER5: BARHES, DAVID~ HERBST, JOHNSOtI~ KII~G, TOLAR
NOES: LOMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSE~JT: COHHISSIONERS: NONE
VACA~lY: 0-~E SEAT
I1~ VITNE55 WFIEREOF~ I have hereunt~ set rry hand this 25th day of September~
1978.
~ ~!~'iVt.c~
SEC°ETA°Y~ Att;,HEi?i CiTY PLhflHfNG COHMISSION
-3- Pt78-229