Loading...
PC 78-230 RESOLUTIOP~ N0. PC78-230 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAIIEIH CITY PLANt~iNG COHIIISSION ?HAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATIOH N0. 78-79-20 BE GRANTED. WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Plannin9 Commission did receive a verified petition for Reclassification from YCUNG F. AND LUCItIDA J. HAt1i1ATT, t543 West Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim, California 92802, owners, and JOHN F. SWINT, 707 West North Street, Anaheim, California 92805, agent, of ccrtain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State nf California, described as follows: 7he North 348 feet of the West 125•~7 fee[ of the 1lortheast quarter of the Idortheast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 28, in Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho Las Bolsas, in the City of Anaheim as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 51. Pa9e ~o+ Mis~P~~aneous Maps, records of said Orange County. The North 25~ feet of the Easuarterl/of athe55outhwest Northwest quarter of the Nor*helst q Range 10 West, San quarter of Section 28, in Tovrnshfp South, B_rnardino Base and Meridian, in the County of Orange, State o~ California. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did schedule a mubi'noticeinofatsaid Zjty Hall in the Gity of Anaheim on August 2B, 1978~ at 1:30 p. public hearing hav ing been dul y given as required Ey law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03~ to hear and consider e~•idence for and agalnst said proposed reclassification and to invesiigate and make findings and recommendatfoCommisslonemeetinghofe0ctobera9a 1978;`andaring having been continued to the Planning WHEREAS, said Commission after due inspection, investi9ation and study made by itself and i~ its behalf, and af[er due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does Pind and detcrmine thc followinq fac[s: ~, That the petitloner proposes reclassifica[ion of ~ubJect property from the R5-A-43,000 (Residentiat/Agricuitural) to the RS-7200 (Residential. Singie- Family) Zone. Z. Th3t the Anaheim General Pian designates subJect property for low- density residential land uses. 3, Tha; the proposed reciasslfication of subJect property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community. 4. 7hat the proposed reclassification of subJect property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximiCy PC78-230 to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the cortmunity. 5. Tha[ the proposed reclassification of subject proper[y requtres the improvement of abutting s[reets in accordance wtth the Circulation Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensification of land use. 6. That no one indica[ed their presence at said public hearing in opposiiton; and that no correspondence was received in oppositton [o the subJect petition. ENVIRONNEPITl1L IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim C(ty Planning Commission has reviewed the proposa to rec ass fy subject property fron the RS-A-43,000 (Residentlal/Agricul[ural) to the RS-7200 (Residential, Single-Famtly) zone [o establlsh a 7-lot, RS-7200 subdivision with Haivers of requlrement that all lots abut a publfc street, minimum lot width and frontage and the requirement that single- family residences rear-on arterial highways on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 1.6 acres, having a frontage of approximately 27.4 feet on the south side of Orangewoocf Avenue, having a maximum depth of approximately 303 feet. being located approximately 52o feet west of the centeriine of Ninth Stree[, and does hereby approve [`~e lde9ative Declaration from the requlrement to prepare an environmenta! Impact repor[ on the basis that there would be no significan[ ir.diviJual or cumulative adverse envlronrnental impact due to the approval of thts Negative Oeclaration since the Anaheim General Plan dest9nates the subject property for low-density resfdential land uses commensuratc with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental inpacts are involved in the propos~l; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmentai impacts; and that [he Nega[ive Declaration substan[iating the foregoing find(ngs is on file in [ne City of Anaheim Planni~g Depart~~ent. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm City Plannln9 Cortmisston does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title 16-Zoning of the Jlnahelm Hunicipal Code be amended [o exciude the above-descrfbed property from tMe RS-A-43,000 jRESIDENTIAL/AGRILULTURAL) ZONE and to incorporate said described property into the RS-7200 (RESIDE~ITIAL, SINGLE-FAHILY) ZONE upon the following conditfons which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequtsite to Che proposed use of subject property tn order to prescrve the safety and general welfare of the Citize~s of the CiCy of Anaheim: 1. Tha[ street lighting facillties along Orangewocd Avenue shall be installed prior to final buliding and zoning inspections unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Utilfties, and in accordance wlth s[andard spectfications on fite in the office of the ~irector of Public Utili[ies; and/or that a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City cf Anaheim, shali be posted wtth the City to guarantee the installatlon of the above-mentioned requlrements prlor to occupancy, 2. That subJect property shall be served by underground u[ilities. -2- PC78-230 3. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a nanner satisfactory to the Lity Engineer. 4. That [he owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fces as determ(ned to be appropriate by the City Counctl, said fces to be paid at the time the building permit ts issued. 5. An ordinance rezontno the subject property shall in no event bacane effective e::cept upon or followtng the recordation of a final tract map approved by the City Council. 6. That all private streets shall be developed in accordance with the City of Anahelm's standards for private streets. 7. ThaL fire hydrants shall 6e installed and charged, as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department, Frior to commencement of structural framtng. 8. That the owner(s) of subject property shaii pay the resldentlal traffic signal assessment fee (Council Policy No, 214} amounting to 536.00 per each new dwelling unit prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1 and 5, above mentioned, shall be completed, The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by actlon of the Planning Lommission unless said conditions are complied w(th within one year from tfie date hereof, or such further time as the Planning Comnission may grant. 10. That Condition Nos. 2, 3 and 6, abovc mentioned, shali be complied wi[h prior to final bullding and zonin9 inspections. BE iT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commtsslon does hereby find and determine that adopiion of this Resolution ts expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and ali of the condittons hereinabove set forth. 5hould any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the fina,l judgment of any caurt of competent Jurisdictton, then this Resolution, and any approvals hereln contained, shail be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTi0~1 is signed and approved by me this 9th day of October, 1978. H RMAM, At~ E t1 CIT LANMiNG COHMISSION ATTEST: ~~ ~ ~ SELRETARY, ANAHEtM CITY PLANNING COMf11S510N -3- PC78-23n STATE OF CALlFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. Ci7Y OF ANAHEIM ) I. Edith L. Harrts. Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Cortmisslon. do hereby certify that the foregotng resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission hcld on October 9, 1978. at 1:30 p.m „ by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMHISSIONERS: BARNES. BUSHORE, DAVID, HERBST, JOHNSON, KING, TOLAR NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of Octobe~. 1978. ~,o,r~~-~'a,~.~.~ SECRETARY. ANAHEIt1 CITY PLANNING COMNISSION -4- PC78-230