PC 78-232ftESOLUTION N0. PC78-232
A RESOLUTIOtI OF THE ANAHEIH CITY PLANNING LOMkISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 78-79-16 BE GRANTED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commissfon dtd recetve a verifted
petition for Reclassificatlon from TAORMINA I~JDUSTRIES, INC. A~~D COSMO V, AIlD AP,IENE
TAORMINA, 16927 Solsa Chica Street~ Huntington Beach, Calffornia 97.6b9, owners. and
FRANY. NOOLSEY. 16927 Bolsa Chica Street, Nuntington Beach, California 92649, agent,
of certain real property situated in the City of Anahelm, County of Orar.ge, State of
California, described as foilows:
PARCEL 1: The Easterly one-acre of the Nesterly four-acres of the
following described land: Beginning ai the Northeasterly corner
of Lot 28 of Anahelm Extenslon, as shown on a map made by William
Hamel, filed far record in the office of the County Recorder of
Los Angeles County, Caltfornia; thence Westerly along the
Northeriy li~e of said lot, 786.90 feet to a point 372.75 feet
Easterly of the Northwesterly corner of said lot 28; thence
Southeriy, parallel to the Westerly line of safd lot. ~-}2 feec;
thence Easterly parallel to the Norcherly itne of said lot, 7°6.90
feei to a point on the Easterly line of sald lot; ihence Northerly
along said Easterly line k42 feet to the point of beginning.
EXCEPTItIG fran said Easterly one-acre of the ~esterly four-acres,
that portion occupied by Vermont Avenue. formeriy 8road Stree[.
PARCEL 2: The Westerly one-half of the Easterly one acre of the
Westerly five acres of Che following described land: Beglnning at
the Northeasterly corner of Lot 28 of "Anaheim Extensfon", as
shown on a map made by Willfam Hame1, filed for record in Yhe
office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, Californfa;
thence Westeriy along the Northerly line of satd lot. 786.90 feet
to a point 378.75 feet Eascerly of the Yorthwesterly corner of
saiJ Lot 20"; tfience Southerfy, paralfel to the Wes[erly line of
said Lot, 442 feet; thence Easterly parallel to the Northerly line
of said tot, 785.90 feet to a point on the Easterly line of said
lot; thence Northerly along sat~ Easterly line 442 fee[ to the
point of beginning, containing 8.09 acres more or less. EXCEPTING
from said Easterly one acre of the Westeriy five acres that
portion occupied by Vermont Avenue, formerly Broad Street. AL50
EXCEPTING THEREFROH tha[ portion included within Parcel 1 as shown
on a map recorded in book 50. page 9 of Parcel Maps, records of
Orange County, California.
WNEREAS, the City Planning Commisston did hold a public hearfng at the City
Hali in tlie City of Anahetm on October 9, 1978, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly gTven as required by law and tn accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03. to hear and conslder
evidence for and against satd proposed reclassification and to investtgate and make
ftndings and recommendations tn connection therewith; and
PC78-232
F
WHEREAS, said Commission, af[er due inspection, investigation and study rnade
by itself and in its behalf, and after due co~sideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and de[ermine the following facts:
t. That the petitioner proposes reclassifica[ton of sub)ect property from
the RS-A-43~000 (Residential/Agricultural) to the RM-1200 (Residentlal, Multiple-
Family) Zone.
2. That although the Anaheim General Plan designates subJect property for
commercial recreatton land uses, the properties to the north across Vermont Avenue
are destgnated for medium density residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassificatlon of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper developmen[ of the community.
4. That [he proposed reclassification of subJect property does properly
relate to the zones and their permit[ed uses tocally established in close proximiLy
to subJec[ property and to the zones and thetr permitted uses generally established
throu9hout the cortmunity.
5. Tha[ the proposed reclassificatlon of subJect property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets In accordance with the Circula[ton
Elenent of the General Plan. due to the anticipated increasc tn [raffit which will be
generated by the intensiftcation of land use.
6. That no one indicated their presence a[ sald public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONHENTAL IMPA~T FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviewed the subJect proposal to reclassify subject property from the RS-A-43,C00
(Residential/Agricultural) to the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family) zone to
construcL a 24-unit apat:ment cor.rplex wlLh waiv~rs of mar.tmnn structural helght on an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately i.l acres~ having a
fronta9e of approximateiy 148 feet on the south side of Vermont Avenue, having a
maximum depth of approximately 409 fee[ and being located approximately 342 feet west
of the cen[erline of Harbor 8oulevard; and does hereby approve the Negative
Declaration from the requtrement to prepare an environmental impact report on the
basis that there would be no signtficant tndivl~ual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative DeclaratTon since the
Anaheim Generat Plan designates the subject property for commercial-recreatTon land
uses co~miensura:e wi[h the proposal; that ~o sensitive environmental impacts are
involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner
tnJicates no significant individual or cumulattve adverse environmental impacts; and
that the Negative Declaration subs[antiating the foregotng findings is on file in the
City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subJect Petition for Reclassiflcatton and. by so dotn9, that Title
18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-descrTbed
-2- PC78-232
property from the RS-A-43,000 (RESIDEtJTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and Co incorporate sa(d
de~cribed property in[o the RM-1200 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAJIILY) ZONE upon the
following conditions which are herzby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of subJect property In order Lo preserve the safety and general welfare
of the Citizens of the Ctty of Anaheim:
1. That sidewaiks shall be installed along Vermont Avenue as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in
the Office of the City Engineer.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shail pay to the Ctty of Anaheim
the sum of three and one-half doliars (53•50) per front foo[ along Vermont Avenue for
streec lighting purposes.
3. That che owner(s) of subject prope~ty shall pay to the City Qf Anaheim
the sum of ~5 cen[s per front foot alo~g Vermont Avenue for tree planting purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on f(le wtth the Office of the Director of Pubiic Norks.
5. That fire hydran[s shall be instailed and charged as requlred and
de[ermined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire DeQartment prior to commencement
of structural framing.
6. That subject property shal) be served by underground utilities.
7. Tha[ drainage of subject property shall bc disposed of in a manner
satisfactory Lo the City Engincer.
8. In the event that subject property is to be divided for the purpose of
sale. tease, or financing~ a parcel map, to record the approved division of subJece
property shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty of Anaheim and Chen be
recorded in the office of the Orange CounLy ftecorder.
9. That the owner cf subject property shal) pay to Lhe Clty of Anaheim the
appropria[e park and recrea[ton tn-licu fees as determined to be appropriete by the
Ctty Council, said fees to be paid at the time the bullding permlt is issued.
16. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay the residential trafiflc
si9~a1 assessment fee (Council Policy No. 214) amounting to 536.00 per each new
dwelling unit prior [o the issuance of a building permTt.
11. Prior to the introduction of an ordi~ance rezoning subJect property,
Conditton Nos. 2, ~ and 8~ above-mentioned, shall be completed. Thc provtsions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and vold by action of the
Pianning Cortmission unless said conditions are complied wi[h within one year from the
date hereof~ or such further time as [he P1anning Commission may grant.
12. That Cond(tion Nos. 1, 4, 6 and 7. abova-mentioned, shall be complied
wttn prior to final ~uildin9 and zoning inspections.
-3-- PC78-232
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commfssion does hereby
find and determine tha[ adoption of this Resolutton is expressly predlcated upon
appticant's compliance with each and all of the tonditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared lnvalid or unenforceabie
by the finaT Jud9ment of any court of competent jurisdfctton, then this Resolution.
and any approvals herein contained, shali be deemed null and void.
THE F~REGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me thts 9th day of
October, 1978.
CHA RMAN, ANAH 1 ITY PL NNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/n ~,C/~l .~• A~G1n.~.~.~
SECR- ETAR`T, At~ANE1M CITY PLA!:HING C0;IMISSION
STA7E OF LALIFOP,?!IA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
LITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning f.ommfsslon, do
hereby certify that the foreyoing resolutfon was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anahelm City Pianning Commission heid on OctoDer 9, 1973. at 1:30 p.n., by thc
foliowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ BUSHORE, DAVID, HERBST. JOHNSON, K11lG, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: LOM!iIS510NER5: NONE
1978.
IN 1JI7NES5 41HEREOF, I havc hereunta set my hand this 9th day of October~
~ Gi, ~S - ~Gt.t~-a/
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COh1MI5SI0N
-4- PC78-232