PC 78-235;~
RESOLUTION N0. PC78-235
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1893 EE DENIED
WHEREAS~ the Anaheim CI[y Planning Cortmission did recelve a verffied
Petttton for Conditional Use Permit from PRADIP G. ANO TARULATA P. NAlK, HANUBHAI N.
NAIK, AND DOLATftAI R. NAIK, 300 North Manchester Avenue, Anaheim, California 92801,
cwners of certaln real property situated in the Clty of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, described as:
Those portions of the Southwest quarter of the Southwestquarter of
Section 9, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, S. ~. B. b M. in the
Rancho San Juan Cajon de San[a Ana, city of Anaheim, county of
Orange, state of Lalifornia, as per map recorded in book 51, page
10 of Hiscellaneous Maps. irt the office of the county recorder of
said county, conveyed to the State of Caltfornia by deeds recorded
in book 1048 page 294, and in Book 1267 page iQ0 of Official
Records, in the office of the county recorder of said coun[y,
tncluded within the following described lines: BEG~NNING at a
point in the Northerly Itne of ihat certain parcel of land
described as Parcel i in said deed to the State of Californta,
recorded in book 1048 page 294, said point being distant along
said Northerly line, South 86° 28' 36" Nest. 222.11 fect from the
Northeasterly corner of said certain parcel of land so described
as Parcel 1 in said deed to the State of CalTfornia, recorded ln
book 1048 page 294; thence South 77° 05' 25" East, 70.39 feet;
thence South 71~ 15' 34" East, 74.88 feet; thence south 37~ 56'
00" East, 49.37 feet; thence South 70 55' S4" West, 31.41 feet;
thence North 77° 57' 31" West, 73•7N feet: [hence Nesterly along a
tangent curve concave Norcherly and having a radius of 1474 feet
through an angle of 7~ 07' ik" an arc distance of 183,19 feet, to
a point of canpound curve; thence NorChwesterly along ,ald
compound curve concave Northeasterly and having a radlus of 136
feet through an angle of 31° 03' S6", an arc distance of 73.74
feet to a potnt on safd Northerly line, distant thereon 142.56
feet Westerly from said point of beginning; thence North 41° 43~
46" Nest. 61.4Q feet to a point in the westerly prolongatTon of
that csrtain course herelnabove described as havin9 a length of
70.39 feet, dtstant along sald prolo~ga[tan, 188.14 feet North 77~
05' 25" West from safd polnt of beginning; thence Eastcrly along
safd prolangatton 188.i4 feet to che point of beginning.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a publYc hearing at the City
Hall in the C(ty of Anaheim on Otto6er 9, 1978~ at 1:30 p.m „ notice of satd public
hearing having bean duly given as required by law and tn accordance with the
provisions of the Anahelm Municipal Code~ Chaptsr 1~.03, to hear and consider
PC78-235
,
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, Investtgation and study made
by itself and in i[s behaif, and after due consideration of all evidence and reporCs
offered at said hearing, does find and determtnc the following facts:
t. That the proposed use is proposed ts properly one for which a
condltional use permit 1s authorized by Anahelm Municipal Code Sectton 18.45.050.040
to wit: to permit the shorring of aduit movtes In an existing motel.
2. That the proposed use is hereby denied on the basis that the use would
not be compattble with the surrounding community consisting of industrial and
canmercial uses with a church and school in close proxtmlty to the subJect property.
3. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adJolning land uses and
the growth and development of the area in which i[ is proposed to be located,
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the par[icular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. Tha[ the granting of the Londitional Use Permit will be detrlmenta! to
the peace, health. safety and general weifare of the Cltizens of the Clty of Anahelm.
6. That one person indica[ed his presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received tn opposi[lon to the subJect
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPALT FINDING: The Planning Director or his au[hortzed
representat ve has determ ne that thr. proposed proJect falls wlthin the definitlon
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the City of A~aheim
Environmental Impact Report Guldelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to prepare an F.IR.
NdN, THEREfORE, BE IT RE50LVED that the Anaheim City Plannfng Commission
does hereby deny subject Petition for Condiclonal Use Permtt on the basis caf the
aforemen[toned findTngs.
THE fOREG01tiG RESOLUTION fs signed and approved by me this 9th day of
October, 1978. - ~
R N~ ANA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
I'i+ ~ d /Hftil.t,~J
SECRETAP,Y~ ANAHEIH CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- PC78-235
'
~ •
~ ~ > + )
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY dF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edtth L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahetm Clty Planning Canmisston~ do
hereby cer[ify that the foregoing resolutton was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anahetm Ctty Pianning Commisston held on actobor 9th~1978 at 1:30 p.m.~ by the
following vote of [he members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BUSHORE, OAVIO, HERBST. JOHNSOM, KING, TOLAR
NOES: COMFSISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
1978.
~N WiTNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thls 9th day of October,
~~ .t° ~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM C17Y PLANNING COttMISSIOPI
-3- PC78-235