PC 78-238RESOLU7i0N N0. PC78-238
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CtTY PLANNING CONM155104
THAT PE7ITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1896 BE GRA~4TEU
WHEREAS~ the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Condltional Use Permit from ALAN AND LILA E. SEGAL AND ROBERT L. AND
GLORIS L. AUSTIN. P. 0. Box 193~ La Mirada, California, 90637, owners, and H. WADE
STELZER, 139 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805, a9ent, of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Caltfornia,
described as:
PARCEL 1: That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast
quarter of Section 18, 7ownship 4 Souih, Ran9e 10 Nest, in the
Rancho Los Coyotes, City of Anaheim, as per rt~ap recorded in book
51, page 10, Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the county
recorder of said county, shown as Parcel 3 on a map recorded in
6ook 54 pa9e 20, Parcel Maps, in the office of the county recorder
of said county.
~NEREAS, the City Pl:,nni~g Correnission did hold a public hearing at the Lity
Hall in the City of Anahei~ on October °, ~978, at 1:30 o.m., notice of said publlc
heartng having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anahein Municipal Code, Chapter 18.^3, to hear and constder
evidence for and against sald proposed conditional use and t~ Investfgate and make
findings and recommendations (n conrection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, i~vestigatio~ and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and af[er due consideration of all evidcnce and reports
offered at sald hearing, docs find and determine tfie following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for ~ahich a condittonal use
permtt is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Lode Section 18.44.050.21Q to wTt: to
permii a pawnshop.
2. That the proposed use will no[ adversely affect the adJolning land uses
and the growth and developmant of the area in which it is proposed [o be located,
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anahefm.
4, ThaC the granting of the Condit~onal Use Permit under the conditione
imposed. if any. will nat be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welr"are of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim,
l',
PC7a-238 ,~
,,;~'
~
~!. ~' ..
.. 4 i
$. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was recefved in opposition to the subJect
petition.
ENVIRONHENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Plannin9 Dtrector or his authortzed
representative has determined that the proposed proJect falls within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class t, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the City of Anahetm
Environmental Impact Report Guidelines and is. therefore, cate9oricaily exempt from
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, TFIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Pe[ition for Condition~l Use Permit, upon Yhe following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
oT the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner{s) of subject property sl~a~l pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of ninety-five cents (95L) per front foot along Orange Avenue for tree
plant(ng purposes.
2. That subject property shall bc developed substan[ially in accordance
wiCh pla~s and specifications on file ~ith the Ci[y of Anaheim marked Exh(bit No. 1.
3. That Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prfor to
the commencement of the activity authorized undsr this resolution, or prtor to the
[ime that the b~ilding permit is issued, or within a period of one year from date
hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning CommissTon may
grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED [ha[ the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission does hereby
find and detr_rmine that ad~ption of thts Resolution is expressly predicated upon
appiicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenfcrceable
by the final judgment of any cour[ of competent jurisdiction, then thts Resolutlon,
and eny approvals herein contained, shail be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and appr ved by mc this 9th day of
October, 1978.
A'IRM N, ~t CI LAMNING COMM SSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM15510N
-z- Pc78-238
;~
~~~
~-: •
,LL ° l.-
57ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harrts, Secretary of the Anaheim City Ptanning Commisston, do
hereby certlfy that the foreyoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on October 9, 1978, at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the members ther•eo`:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BUSHORE, DAVID, HERBST. JOHtJSON. KING~ TOLAR
NOES: COMNISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARMES
~97~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of October,
~~~~ .z° ~~
SECRETARY, ANAt1EIN CITY PLA4NING COMMISSION
-3- PC78-238
. __~ ~ :~