PC 78-25RESOLUTION N0. PC78-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM LITY PLANNIN4 COM!115510N
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NQ. 77-78-38 BE GRANTED.
WNEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verifted petitlon for
Rer.lassification from ROOBIE Y~UFMAN At~D JAMES NORMP.N MORf,AN, 3~~ ~outh Harbor Boulevard,
Suite 51a, Anahetm, California 92305, owners, of certain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orangc, State of California, described as follows:
Beginning at ihe Northwesterly corner of Block 8 of a replat of
the Orchard Park Tract, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 7, page
6 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange Lounty, California;
thence Easterly along the Northerly line of said dlock, 249.75
feet; thence Southerly parallel to the Wes[erly tine of said eloclc
a,229•5 feet; thence Westerly parallel rrith the Northerly line of
said Block 24Q.75 feet to the WPSterly line of said Dlock; thence
Northerly along the Wesierly line of satd Block 8, 22°.5 fee[ to
the placc of beginning.
Excepting therefrom the Nor[herly 3~ feet of said land as conveyed
to the Lity of Anaheim, a Municipal corpora[ion, for road and
incidental purposes, by an instrument dated Oc[ober 11, 1?12 and
recorded December 9, 1°12 in Book 224, paae 110 of Deeds.
uHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the Lity of Anaheim on February 13, 1?18, at i:3o p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recomme~dations in connec[ion therewith; and
WfiEREAS, said Commission, af[er due inspectton, investigation and study made
by itself and in tts behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject prnperty from
the RS-7200 (Residential, Single-Family) Zone to the CO (Carmercial, Offlce and
Professional) Zone.
2. That although the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for
low density residential land uses, adjacent p:operty to the west and nearby
properties to the north and south are designated for general conmercial land uses.
3, That the oroposed reclassification is hereby granted on the basis that
the r+esterly portion of the proposed devetopment was previovsly approved for
commercial and professional development in connection «ith Reclassiftcation No. 67-
66-63 (approved by the City Counctl on January 25, 1956) and subJect to the
petitioner~s stipulation that any modifications to the development plans. as
presented Lo the Plannin9 Lommission, shall be revlewed and approved by the Planning
Commission prior to the issuance of buildin9 permits.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subJect property Is necessary
and/or dcsirable for the orderiy and proper development of the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of suhject property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close oroximity
PC78-25
[o subJect property and to the zones and their permitted usr_s generally established
throughout the community.
6, That the proposed reclassificatton of subject property requires the
dedication and improvement of abu[ting streets in accordance with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticinated increase in traffic a~hich will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
7. That 11 persons fndicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition.
ENVIROtIMENTAL IMPACT FINDIkf; That the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commfssion has
reviewed [he subJect proposal to rrciassify the zoning fron RS-7200 (RESIDENTIAL,
SI~~GLE-FAMILY) to CO (COt1MERICAL, OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL) on a rectanqularty-shaped
parcel of land consfsttng of aoproximately O.Q acre, having ipproximate `rontages of
i9F, feet on the south side of South Strcet, 200 fect on the east side of Harbor
Boulevard and 200 feet on the west side of Hciena Street and does hereby approve the
Negative Declaration from the requirement to orepare an environmental impact report
on the basis that there rrould be no significant indivtdual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to thc approval of this Negativc Declaration; that although
[he Anahei^~ General Pian designates the subject property for low density resideniial
land uses, adjacent property to the wcst and nearby oroperties [o the north and south
are designated for general commercial land uses cammensurate with the proposal; that
no sensitive environmental impac[s are involved in the proposal; that the Initial
Study submitted by the pe[itioner indica[es no signific~n[ individual or cunulative
adverse r.nvironmen[al impacCS; and that the Negative Declara[ion substantiating the
forcgoing findings is on filc in thc Cit/ of P.nahcir~ Planninq Departr~en[.
NO'a, THEREFORE, BE IT RFSOL~'ED tha[ the Anaheim City r'lanning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassif(cation and, by so doinq, that Title
18-Zoning of ihe Anaheim Municipa) Code be anended to exclude the above-described
property fron thc RS-72~0 (P,ESIDE~ITIAL, SINGLF-FAMILY) 20t~F and tn incorporate said
describcd oroper*.y into [he CO (COM'~ERLIl1L, OFFICE At~~ PROFESSIONAL) ZONE upon the
follo~•+ing conditions which are hereby found to be a nec~ssary prerequistte to the
proposed use of subject proacrtv in order to preserve [he safety and general welfare
of thc Ci[Izens of the City of Anaheim:
1. Th~t the owner(s) of suhject pronerty shall deed to the City of Anahelm
a strip of land 25 feet in widch from the centerlinc of the strePt along Ffelena
Street for street widening ourposes.
2. ThaL all engTneering requtrements of ihe Lity of Anaheim along South
Street, Helena Street, and Narbor Boulevard, including preparation of improvement
plans and installation of all improvements such as curbs and gucters, sidewalks,
stree[ grading and paving, drainage facilicies o~ other appurtenant work, shail
be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard
plans and specifications on file fn the office of the City Engineer; that street
ltght facilities along South Street. Helena Street, and Harbor Boulevard shall be
installed prior to final building and zoning inspections unless otherwise
approved by the Dtrector of Public Utilities; or that a bond, certificate of
deposit, letter of credit. or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to [he
City of Anahcim, shall be posted with the Ciey to guarantee thc installation of
the above-mentioned requirements prior to fir,al occupancy.
3. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of sixty ce~ts (60 E) per front foot along South Street and Flelena Street
for cree planting purposes. PC78-25
-2-
~
~ ; ' _~
4. That trash storage arcas shall be provide.i in accordance with approved
plans on file with [he Office of the Director of Public 4lorks.
5. That fire hydrants shail be installed and charged, as requtred and
determined to be necessary by the Chief oY thc Fire Department, prior to
commencement of structural framing.
6. That subject prooerty shall be served by underground utilitles.
7. That drainage of subJect property shall be dispose~l of in a manner
satisfactory to the Li[y Engineer,
8. Prior to the tniroduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be completcd. The provisions
or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of Yhe
Pianning Commission unless said condittons are complied with within one year from
the date hereoF, or such further time as the Planning Comnission may grant.
?. That Co~di[ion Nos. 4, 6 and 7, above mentioned. shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
10. That the subject property shall be developed substantialiy in
accordance rri[h plans and specifications on file wi[h the Lity of Anaheim, marked
Exhibits 1, 2, and 3. and that any modifications thereto shail be sukxnitted to
the Planning Commission for revieo~ and approval prior [o the issuance of building
permits.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUT101~ is signed and approved by me this 13th day of
February, 1~73.
~
~_r'.(~ l %~~~~ /~ZG-.'~
LI~AIRMA;I, ANAHEIM CITY PLANt11NS GO!1MISSION
ATTEST:
~~
~ ~E~ ,rG' 7~a~~,
SECRETARY~ A~~ANEIM CITY PLANNIHG LOMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
GOUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIH )
t, Edt[h L. Narris. Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission~ do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolutlon was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim Ci[y Planning Commission held on February 13, 1978~ at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, DAVID, H~RBST. JONNSON, KING, LINN~ TOLAR
NOES: C011M15SIONERS: NbNE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNE55 1JF!EREOF, I have h~reunto set my hand this 13th day of february,
197II.
~~.~G ~ ~lQ,~.~.
, ~ ~ ~~SioN
-3- PC7~-2S