PC 78-251i
RESOLUTIO~d N0. PL78-251
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM LITY PLANt11NG COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT M0. 1898 BE GRANTED, IN PAfiT
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Canmission did receive a vcrified
Petition for Conditlonal Use Permit from HOWARD AND JEAN GARBER, HAROLD S. AND BETTY
H. PROTTAS, 2008 East Llncoln Avenue, Anahetm, Californta 92806. owners, and TMOMAS
C. COCHRAN, 2325 Sequola Street, Anaheim, Califorreta, 92801, agent, agent, of certain
real oroperty situated 1n the City of Anafieim, County of Oran9e, State of California~
described as:
TffOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 35 and 36 OF TRACT 1161 IN THE CITY OF
ANAIIEIM, COU~~TY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHONN ON MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 36, PAGES 45 and 4G OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS. IN THE
OFFILE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID LOUNTY; A~ID THOSE PORTIONS
OF LOTS 189, 190 and 191 OF TRACT 1202 It7 TNE COUtITY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CAIiFORNIA, AS SIi01dW ON MAP RELORDED IN BOOK 37. PAGES 27
AND 23 OF NISLELLANEOUS HAPS, IN THE OFFiCE OF THE GOUPITY RECORDER
OF SAID COUNTY, HORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS A 11HOLE AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNI4G AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 35; THE~ILE
EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTNERLY LINE Of SAID LOTS 35, 36, 1E9, 190
AND lA1 A DISTANCE OF 365.TE FEET; THEHCE lJESTERLY IN A DIRECT
LINE TO A POINT tN THE WESTERLY LI~~E OF SAID LOT 35, DISTANT
f~OP,THERLY THE~lCE 85.09 FEET FROM SAID SOUTNWESTEP.LY CORNER; THENCE
SOUTNERLY ALONG SAID 4fESTERLY LIt~L 85.09 FEET TO THE P01~lT Of
BEGINNtNG.
WIIEREAS, the City Plannfng Conmission did schedule a public hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim on October 23, 1978, at 1:30 p.m,~ noCice of said
public hearfng having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1$.03, to iiear and consider
evldence for and against said proposed condtttonal use and to investigace and make
findinys and recanmenda[ions in con~ection therewith; said public nearing having been
continued to the Planning Commission meeting of November 6, 1973; and
WHERE/15, safd Commission, after due inspection, Investigation and study made
by itself and In its behalf, and after due consideratton o` atl evTdence and reports
offered at said hearing, does ft~d and determine the follow(ng facts:
i. That the proposed use ls properly one for which a conditionat use
permit is authorized by Anahetm Hunictpal Cocie Section tE.03.030.010 to wtt: To
permit an ou[door construction storage yard in the "CL" (Commerctal, Limited) Zone
with waivers of:
(a) SECTION 18.04.043.102 - Maximum fence hel ht.
~2 lnches perm [ted in requtred setback;
6 eet ex sttng)
(b) SEC1'ION 18.44,n64.010 - Ml~tmum landsca in~.
3 eet required adJacent to street;
none existtng)
PC73-251
~
(t) SECTION 18.44.064.011 - Requtrcd site screening.
oot high block wali requlred;
none proposed)
2, That the aforementioned walvers are hcreby denled on the basis that the
proper[y abuts a local s[reet where all the propert(es on the opposite side are zoned
for single-famlly residentlal use and no provisfon fs bef~g made for the protection
of the residentia! uses in the Immediaie vicinity, and that the existing Illegal use
has resulted in adverse impacts on the surrounding area causing parking problems on
the resldential street and creati~g an unslghtly view of the outdoor s[orage area.
3. That the proposed use fs hereby granted, wi[hout waivers, subject Lo
the following conditions which must be complied with within 90 days.
a. That no combustible materials shall bc stored on site.
b. That a minimum 3-foot wtde landscaped planter shall be installed and
maintained adJacent to Sequota Avenue.
c. That a 6-foot high block Natl shall be constructed behind the 3-foot
landscaped area adjacent to Sequoia Avenue.
d, Thai all employee parking shatl be on site.
e. That visuatly effiective landscape screening (Itallan Cypress.
oelande~s, etc.) shal) be provided along the north property line to
screen the outdoor storage area from traffic on La Palma Avenue.
f. That no materials shall be stored any higher than the enclosing fence.
4. That the proposed use, as gra~[ed, will not adversely affec[ the
adJolning land uses and the 9rowth and development of the area ln which it is
propased to be located.
S. Thac che stze and shape of the slte proposed for the use. as granted,
Is adequa[e to altow the full development of the proposed use in a manner noc
detrimental to the parttcular area nor to the peace~ health, safety, and general
welfare of the Citize~s of the City of Anahelm,
6. That thc Conditional Use Permit. as granted, and under the conditions
impostd, wlll not be detrimental [o the peace, health, safety and general welfare of
the Cittzens of the City of Anaheim.
7. 7hat seven persons indicated thetr presencE at said public hearing Tn
opposition; and a peti[ton containing approximately 10 sTgnatures was submitted fn
opposition; and a petition containtng approximately 7 signatures was submttted tn
favor of the request; and that no further correxpondence was receTved in appositTon
to the SubJect petTtio~.
ENVIRONMENTAL IM?ACT FINOING: That the AnaheTm City PlannTng Commission has
reviewed the proposal to permit an outdoor constructlo~ storage yard on an
Irregularly•shaped parcel of land consfstl~g of approxtmatety 0.3 acre~ having a
frontage of approximately 365 feet on the north side of Sequola Avenuc. having a
maximum depth of approximately 85 feet, being loca;ed approximately 244 feet south of
the centerllne of La Palma Avenue; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration
-2- PC78-251
from the requTrement to prepare an environmenta) impact report on thc basis [hat
therc Hould be no slgnlficant individual or cumulative adverse environmentai impact
due to the approval of this Negai:ve Oeclaration slnce the Anahelm Gereral Plan
designates the subJect property for low-density residentlai and general commerclal
land uses cormnensurate with the proposai; that ~o sensitive envlronmental lmpacts are
involved in the proposal; tha[ the Inittal Study submittcd by the petitioner
lndicates no slgnificant individuai or cumulative adverse e~vironmental lmpacts; and
Chat the Negative ~eclaration substantiating the foregoln9 ftndings is on file in the
Ctty of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW~ THEREFdRE~ BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Cr~nnission
does hereby grant, In pari, subject Petition for Condlt{onal Use °ermit, upon the
following condltlons which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequ(site to the
proposed use of the subJect property in order to preserve [he SaFety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the Cliy of Anahelm:
i, That street llghting faciltties along Sequoia and La Paima Avenues
shall be installed prior to the final buildi~g and zoning inspectlons unless
otherwise approved by the Oirector of P~blic Utilitles, a~d in accord~nce with
standard specifications on file in [he Office of the Director of Public Utilities;
and/or that a bond, certificate of deposit, istter of credit, or cash. in an amount
and form sa[isfactcry to the City of Anaheim shall be posted wi[h the Lity to
guarantee tha[ the above Improvements will be installed prior to occupancy.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall submi[ a letier requesting
terminat(on of Conditional Use Permit No. 689.
3. That subJect property shall be developed substantlally in accordance
with plans and specifica[ions nn flle with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. i;
provided, however, thai:
a, a minimum 3-foot wfde landscaped plantsr shall bc instailed and
malntained adJacent to Sequoia Avenue;
b, a 6-foot high block wall shail be canstructed behind sald 3-foot
landscaped area, a~d;
c, a visually effective landscape screen consisting of I[alian Cypress
and/or oleanders (or some other approprlate piants approved by the
Plannin9 Department) shall be provided along the north property line
adjacent Lo La Palma Avenue.
4, That no combusttble materials shall be stored on site.
5. That all elnployee parking shall be on site at all times.
6. That all of the aforemenctoned Co~dltion Nos. 1 through 5 shall be
complled with Nithin a period of ninety (9~) days from the date hereof or such
further time as the Plan~tng Commission may gran[.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that thc Anaheim Ctty Planning tanmissi~n does hereby
find and determin~ that adoption of chis Resolution is expressly predtcated upon
applican['s compllance with each and all of Lhe conditlons hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condltlon, o~ any part thereof, be declared invatid or unenforceable
-3- PC78-251
by the final Judgment of any court of competent JurTsdictton. then this Resolution,
and any approvals heretn contained, shall bc deemed nui) and vofd.
THE FOREGOING RESULUTION is sign d and approved by me this 6th day of
November, 1978•
A MAN, A1 M C T PIANNING CONMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, AtlANEIM CITY PLANNING COMNISSI~t~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
C~TY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris. Secre[ary of the Anahelm City Planntng CommTssion, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meecing of
the Anahelm City Plann(ng Commisslon held on November 6, 1978, at 1:30 P.m.~ by the
followTng vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BAP,NES~ BUSNORE, DAVID, HERBST, KING,
M1OES: COMMISSIONERS: hONE
ABSENT: COHHtSSI0NER5: JOHHSON~ TOLAR
IN WITNESS 4MEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand thTs 6th day of November,
1978.
~~ ,~° ~_
SECRETARY, ANANEIH CITY PLANNING COMMISSIUN
-~- PC78-251