PC 78-255RESOLUTION N0. PC78-255
A RESOLUTION OF THE AHAHEIM CITY PLAtJNING COFINISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1875 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Gommission did receive a verifled
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from fIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF ANAHEIM, 515
North Sta[e College Boulevard. Anaheim, Californla °2805, owner of certaln real
property situated in the Ci[y of Anahelm, County of Orange, State of California,
described as:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 3 OF THE ANAHEIM EXTENSION, IN THE GiTY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SNONN ON A MAP
OF SURVEY NADE BY WILLIAM HAMEL AND FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUtJTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, A COPY OF WHICH
IS SHOWN IN F300K 3 PAGE 163. ET SEQ., E~ITITLED "LOS A~IGELES COU~~TY
f1APS'~, RECORDS OF SA10 ORANGE COUNTY. DESCRIBED AS FOLL0415:
BE6111NING AT 7HE 59UTHEAST LORNER OF SAID L07 3, BEING AT THE
INTERSECTION OF TNE CENTER LINES OF PLACENTIA AVENUE AMD SYCA`IORE
STREET; THENLE SOUTH 74~ 3G' 30" WE5T 353.73 FEET ALO~~G THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3; THEN~E NORTH 1~ 41' 20" NEST
383.72 FEET; 7HENCE SOUTH 8pO 51' 30" EAST 352.AZ FEET TO THE
EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 3: TftENCE SOUTH 0° 07' 30" WEST 288.20 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; A~ID GOMME4CING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNEP,
OF SAID LOT 3, BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINES OF
PLACEtITIA AVENUE AND SYCAMORE STREET; THENLE S01lTH 74° 3~' 30"
WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE Of SAID SYCAHORE STRE[T A DISTANCE OF
456.65 FEET, SAID P011~T BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGItINING; THEIJCE
NORT11 1° 41' 20" WEST 411.47 FEE7; TNENCE NORTH 89° 51' 30" WEST
200.15 FEET TO 7HE 4lESTEP,LY LINE OF LAND DESCP,IBED IN R OEED TO
GEORGE G. GRIFFITH r~ND WIFE, RECORDED AUGUST 13. 192~3 Itl BOOK 183,
PAGE 465 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 1~ 41' 20" EAST
467.01 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE ANO ITS SOUTHERLY
PROLOt7GAT~Ot~ TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID S~CAHOR~ STREET; THENLE
NORTH 74~ 30' 30" E~ST 206.Q0 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEG 117P1 I NG.
WHEREAS~ the Clty Planning Coamission u:d '~old ~ ouhltc hea~ing at the City
Hall in the Clty of Anaheim on November 6, 5978. at 1:30 N.m., noiire vf said publtc
hearing having been duly given as required by la~r and in ~_~=rdance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Lode, Chapter 18.03. Lo r• ~'~~ and consider
evtdence for and against said proposed conditionat use and to investigate and make
findtngs and recommendattons tn connection therewith; and
ti1HEREAS, said Commission, after due Inspeciion* investTgation and study made
by itself and In Tts behalf, and after due conslderatfon of all evidence and reports
offered at safd heartng, does find and determine the followin9 facts:
PC78-~55
~
1. That the proposed use (s properly one for which a conditlonal use
permit ts authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 1E3.21.050.110 to wtt: To
expand a church with waivers of:
(a) SECTION 18.05.080.03~ - Maximum number of identtflcatton sl ns.
1 permitted; 2 proposed
(b) SECTION 18.05.060.030 - Haximum si n area
~20 s u~are eet permltted;
30 squar eet proposed)
2. That the praposed use is hereby granted subJect to the petitloner's
stfpulation that there shali 6e no loudspeakers utilized in the "worshfp-in-
automobile" outdoor parl:ing area and, furthermore, tha[ the speaker system utilized
ta allow persons in the automobiles to hea~ the church servicc shall not be audible
at the proper[y )ines.
3. That the aforementio~ed walvers are hereby granted on the basis that
dcniat would be depriving [his property of privileges befng enJoyed by other
proper[tes in the same area since other nearby si9~s are comparitively larger and
that the proposed second siyn consisting of three crosses although technically
considered a sign contains no worded advertistng or identification.
4, That [he proposed use will not adverscly affec[ [he adJoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area in which tt is proposed to be located.
5. Tha[ the size and shape of the stte proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor [o the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Cftizens
of thc City of Anaheim.
6. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the condittons
imposed, if any, wfll not be detrimental to thc peacc, health, safety and gene~al
welfare of the Cittzens of the Clty of Anaheim.
7. That no one indicated thelr presence at sald pubiic hearing in
opposition; and [hat no correspondence was received ln opposition to the subJect '
petltlon.
EtIVIRONMENT L IHPACT FINDING: That the Anahelm City Planntng Commisslon has
revlewed the proposal to expand a church wlth walvers of maximum number of sTgns
permitted and maximum slgn area on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting
of approximately 5.2 acres located at the nor[h~est corner of Sycamore Street and
State College Boulevard~ having approximate frontages of 620 feet on the north slde
of Sycamorc Strcet and 2b8 feet on the west stde of State College Boulevard, and does
hereby approve the Nega[ive Declara[lon from the requlremen[ to prepare an
environmenCa) tmpact report on the basls that thare would be no signiflcant
tndividual or cumulattve adverse envlronmentai lmpact due to the approval of this
-2- PC78-255
f
Negattve Declaraiion since the Anaheim Generai Ptan designates the subject property
for commercial and medium density residentlal land ~ses commensurate with the
proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved tn the proposal; that
the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant ind(vidual or
cumulative adverse envtronmental impacts; and that the ~iegative Declaratlnn
substan[iating the foregoing ftndings is on file in the Lity of Anahelm Planning
Department.
NOW~ Tf1EREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED that the Anahetm Ctty Planning Lortmisslon
does hereby grant subJect Petition for Condittonal Use Permit, upon the following
condit(ons which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subJecc property in ordcr to preserve the safety and general weifare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay to the Gity of An~hetm
the sum of three and one-half dollars (S3.50) per front foot alon9 State College
Boulevard and Sycamorc Street for screei lighting purposes.
2. That [he owrser(s) or subJect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of ninety-five (9~~) cents per front foot along Sycamore Stree[ for tree
planting purposes.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file orith the Office of the Dlrector of Public Works.
4. in [he event that subject property is to be divided for the purpose of
sale, lease, or financing, a parcel map, [o record the approved dir•Ision of subJect
property shall be submitted to and approved by the Ctty of Anahelm and then be
recorded tn the office of the Orange County Recorder,
5. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Co~ncll Pollcy ~lo. 214) ar„ounttng [0 513Q.Q0 per iQOQ square feet of
church building or fraction thereof prior to the Issuance of a buiidtng permit.
6. That subJect property shall be developed substan[tally in accordance
with plans and specifications on file wtth the CEty of Anahelm maryed Exhiblt Nas, t
through 6.
7. That Condition Nos. i, 2 and 4~ above-mentioned. shall be complied with
prior to Che commencement of the ac[ivity authortzed under this resolutlon, or prtor
to the ttme that the building permit Is issued, or within a period of one year from
date hereof, whichever occurs flrst. or such further time as the Planning Commtssion
may grant.
8. That CondttTon kos. 3 and 6~ above-menttoned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
-3- PC78-255
i
9. 7ha[ loudspeakers wi11 not be utilized Tn the 'ti+orship-in-automobile"
outdoo~ parking arca and, furthermore, that any speaker system which Is utilized
shall not be audlble at the property il~es.
BE IT FURTHEP. RESOLVED that the Anahelm C(ty Pla~ning Cc~mmission does hereby
flnd and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's canpliance witl~ each and all of the conditions herein~bove set forth.
Should any such candltTon, or any part thereof~ be declared inval(d ar unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competene Jurisdiceion. then thts Resolution,
and any approvals herei~ containcd, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RE56LUTIOtI !s signed and approved by me thts 6th day of
November, 1978, ~
~• 1 LITY PLANNIHG COHHISSION
ATTEST: ~
~~ .?.' /~.
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISStON
STATE OF CALIFOR~lIA )
COUNTY OF ORArIGE ) ss.
ClTY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ed1[h L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim Clcy Planning Commisslon~ do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolutfon was passed and adopted at a meettng of
the Anaheim Clty Planning Commisslon held on Nov~mber 6. 1978, at 1:30 p.m., by the
fo11ow1ng vote of the membcrs thereof:
AYES: CCMMISSI0NER5: BARNES. BUSNORE. DAV1D, HER85T, KING,
NOES: COMriIS510NER5: NONE
ABSENT: COHMISSIONERS: JOHNSON, TQLAR
1978
IN WIT~IE55 WHERcQF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of Novanber,
~ ~(. 1~~
S:GRE7ARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CONMISSION
-4- PC78-255