PC 78-2571'
; ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC78-257
A RESOLUTION OF THE APlANEIM CITY PLANNING COMr115510t~
THAT PETITION FOR CONDiTIONAL USE PERMIT ND, 1904 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Anahcim City Planning Comnission did receive a verifled
Pe[itlon for Condi[ional Use Permit from WILLIAM H. AND JOAN E. SHOEMAKE, 224 East
Broadway, Anahetm, California, 92805, owners, and CLARE~JE BALLAFtD, 9~0 Peary Way.
Anaheim, Cal~~ornia 92807, agent, af certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
The East 1/2 of LoC 6 and atl of Lot 7 in Block M of "Lenter
Tract, Anaheim", in the City of Anahelm, as per map recorded in
book 14, pa9e 13, Miscellanecus Records, Los Angeles County,
California.
WNEREAS, the City Planning Coc+mission dld hold a puhlic hearing a[ the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on t~ovember 6, 1~78, at 1:30 p,m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and 1n accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.rJ3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and to tnves[(gate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS. said Commission, af[er due inspection, inves[igation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, anJ after due consideration of atl evidence and reports
offered at said heari~g, does find and determine the following facts:
1. Tha[ the proposed use is properly one for whic'~ a ccnditional use
permlt is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sectton 18.44.05~.~~0 to wit: to
permit a church with waivers of:
(a) SECTION 18,06.Cb0.02G5 - Minfmum number of arkina s aces.
12 required; proposed
(b) SECTION 13.k4.063.020 - Minlmum structural setback.
5 eet required; none ex sting)
2. That the proposed use and aforementioned waivers are hereby denied on
the basis that the subJect proper[y is currently developed in a manner which would be
substandard for a church in that there vrould be inadequate parking areas and that
other nearby parceis wo~ld be detrimentally effected by the resulting off-site
parking if the church were approved.
3, That the proposed use will adversely affect the adJoining land uses and
the growth and development of the area in which tt is proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the s(te proposed for thP use is not
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use i~ a manner not
detrimental to the particular are~ nor to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Clttzens of the City of Anah~im.
Pc7a-x57
~
~~-- : I
5. Tha[ [he granting of the Condittonal Use Perm(t will be detrimental to
the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the Cttizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That one person indicated thetr presence at said publtc hearing tn
oppositlon; and that no correspondence was recetved In opposltion to [he subject
petition.
EtJVIRONNENT/1L IMPACT FIHDING: That the Anaheim Lity Plannfng Corru~isslon has
reviewed the proposal to permiL a church wiih waivers of mintmum number of parking
spaces and minlmum structural setbacE; on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land
consisttng of approxtmately 0.2 acre located at the southv,est corner of Broadway and
Philadelphta Street, having approximate fronta9es of 6~ fcet on the south slde o'
Broadway and 134 feet on the west side of Philadelphia Strect; and does hereby
aPprove the Negative Declaration from the requirenent [c prepare an envlronmental
impact report on the basis that there would be no signtficant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this *legative
Declaration since the Anaheim Gencral Pla~ designates the subJect property for medium
density residential land uses conmensurate with the proposal; tha[ no sensitive
environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study su'xnitted
by the petitioner indlcates no signlficant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaratfon substantiating [he foregoing
findings is on file in [he City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, TIiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Canmission
does hcreby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit on thc basis of the
aforementloned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me [his 6th day of
November, 1973.
,-~ .
+, nr~n , i Art~~ i ~~r, COH`t I SS I ON
ATT~ST:
(o~[.~. ~ ~...,
SECRET/1RY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORA~~GE ) ss.
C ITY OF A'IANE IM )
I, Edith L. Harrts, Secretary of the Anaheim Ctty Plann(ng Cormnisston. do
hereby certtfy tha[ the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted a[ a meeting of
[he Arahetm City Planning Commisslon held on November 6, 1478, at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BUSHORE, 9AV1~. HERBS`i, KING,
NOES: LO!IMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSEt~T: CaMMIS510NER5: JOHNSON, TOLAR
IN NITNE55 WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of November,
~978.
5~~
-2- PC78-257