PC 78-26RESOLUTION N0. PC78-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIN, CON,MISSION
THAT PETITIOfI FOR RECLASSIFICAT104 N0. 77-73-39 BE ;RANTED.
WHEREAS, thc Anaheim City Planning Ca~missian did receive a verlt`ied petition for
Reclassification from LANA CQRPORATIOt~~ 934 Lhestnu[ S[rcet, EscondiJo, Caltfornia 92025,
orrncr, and JAMES L. BARISIC, 825 South Westcrn Avenue, Anah~im, California 92804, agent.
of certain real property situated in the Lity of Anaheim, County of Qrange, State of
California, described as follows:
Those portions of Loc J+0 of the Anahetm Ex[ension as shorm on a
map of a survey by Nilliam Hamel in Decenhcr, 1358 and filyd in
the office of the Coun[y Recorder of Los Angeles Lounty,
California and chat portion of the Y.ocfflcr Tract, as per map
recorded in boolc 3~, page 17 of Miscellaneous Records of Los
Angeles Lounty, Califnrnia; all beln9 in the City of 1lnaheim,
County of Orange, State of California described as follows:
Cor.Knencing at the Southeast corner of [hat certain 1.~4 Acre
parcei shown on a mao filed in book 3?, page 2~ of Record of
Surveys, records of Orange County; thence S 7ri° ~+1' 15" 41 ~~.ZS
feet along the Southeriy line of said parcel to the true point of
beginning; thence continutng along said SouCherly line 5 74° 41'
15" u 310.09 feet to the Southrlesterly corner thereof; thence N 150
21' 13" 41 2f,8.50 fcet alonn the Wesierly )ine of said parcel to a
line pa~allel aiith and distant 53.~~ feet Southerly `ra~n the
c~nterline of La Palma Avenue; thence N,q° 3q' 1n" E 15Q.82 feet
along said parallel line to a li~c parallel with and ~fistant
1G5.~~ feet Westerly from the Easterly line of said 1.84 lcre
parcel; thence S 15° 21' 1B" E 2n2,!t7 feet ~lonn said paralle!
line to a line parallel with and distint 25.~~ fect Northerly from
aforementioned Southerly line; thence N 74~ 1~1' 15" E~54.75 fee[
along said parailel line; thence S 15° 21' 18" E 25.~~ feet to the
point of beginning.
NNCREI,S, the City Ptanning Cu~nrnissian clid F~ot~1 a puhtic hearlrg ~[ the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on February 13, 1473, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said pubitc
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with [he
provisions of the AnaheTm Municipal Code, Chapter 18,03, to hear and consider
evidence for and agaTnst said provosed reclass~fication and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therer~ith; and
WHEREAS, said Corm=•:ton, af[er due inspection, investiGation and siudy made
by itself and in its behali, ,,nd after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing. does find and determine thc follo~aing facis:
1, That the petftioner proposes rectassification of subject property from
thc CL (Commercial, Limi[ed) and RH-1200 (Residential, Hultipte-Family) T.ones to the
RM-1200 (P,esidenttal. N:uitiple-Family) Zone.
2. That although the Anaheim General Plan designates subject aroperty for
elementary school and/or general c«nmercial land uses, nearby propertias l~cated to
the ~orth of La Palma Avenue are designated for mediun density residentlal land uses.
3. That the prop,,sed reclassificatlon is hereby aranted sub)ect to any
modffications to the deveiopment pla~s, as presPnted to the Planning Commtssion,
bein9 approved by the Plannl~g Commission prior to thr_, issuance of building permits.
PC78-26
3. That the proposed reclassification of suhicct prnperty is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the comnunity.
4. That [he proposed reclassification of suhject property does properly
relate to the zones and the(r per~icted uses loc~lly estahlished in close proximity
to subject property and to thr. zones and their permitted uses generally established
Lhroughout the community.
5. That the propos~d reciassification of suhject property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Lirculation
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic •Nhich will be
generated by [hc intensification of land use.
6. That no one indicated Lheir presence at said public hearing in
oppositton.
ENVIRO~IHEtlTAL IMPACT fINDIN~S: That thc Anaheim City Planning Commisston
has reviewed the subject proposa to reciassify the zoning from CL (COMt1ERC{AL,
LINITED) and RM-i200 (P.ESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) to RN-1200 (RESIDENT~AL,
MULTIPLE-FAMILY) on an frregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approxrmately
1 acre located west and s~uth of the southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Harbor
Baulevard, having approximate frontages of 161 feet on the south side of la Palma
Avenuc and 25 feet on the west sldc of Harbor Boulevard, bcing located aoproximately
190 feet west of the centerline of Harbor Boulevard and 215 fee[ south of the
centerline of La Palma A~enue, and does hereby approve the tlegative Declara[ion from
the requirement [o prr_pare an environmental impact report on the basis that there
would be no significan[ individual or cumulative adverse environmental inpact due to
the approvai of this kegative Declaration; that although the Anahcim General Plan
designates [he subject property for an elemen[ary school and/or general commercial
land uses, nearby propertles located to the north of La Palma Avenue are designated
for medfum densi[y reside~iial land uses ccxmensurate with the proposal; that no
sensitivic environment~l impacts are involved in the proposal; that ihe Initial Study
submitt~:d by Lhe pe[itioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse
envirornnental impacts; and tha[ Che Negative Declaration substantiatin, Che foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
N041, THEREFORE, BE 17 RESOLVEO that the Anahcim City Planning Commission
dees hereSy ,rranL SuhJect Q^Llilon for Reclassification and, by so doinq, that Ti[le
18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Lode be amended to exclude [he above-described
property from the LL (COHMERCIAL. LIMI7ED) and RM-1200 (RESIDEIITIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY)
ZON£5 and to incorporate said described property into the R'~-17.00 (RESiDENTiAL,
MUL7IPLE-FAMILY) ZONE upon the following conditions which are herebY found to be a
necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of suhject property in order to preserve
thc safety and qeneral welfare of Che Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
i. That the owncr(s) of subject Droperty shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 53 feet In width from the centerli~R of the street along La Palma
Avenue and a strip of land 45 feet in width from the centerline of tfie street along
Harbor Boulevard for street widening purposes.
2, That all en9ineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along La Palma
Avenue. includtng preparation of improvement plans and installation of alt
improvements such as curhs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving.
drainage facilities or other appurtenant +vork, shall be comPlied with as required by
the City Engt~eer and in accordance with standard plans and spec~fications on file in
[he office of ihe Clty Enginer.r; or that a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of
credTt, or cash, tn ~n anount and form sa[isfactory to the City of Anaheim, shall be
-2- PC7g-26
posted With the City to guarantee the inscallation of the above-mentfoned
requirements prior to final occupancy,
3. That the ormer(s) of subJect property sh~ll pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of three and one-half dollars (53.5~) per front foot along La Palma Avenue
for street iighting purposes.
4, That the owner(s) of subJect property shatl pay to the City of Anahetm
the ;um of si~ty cents (6G~) per front foot along La Palma Avenue for tree planting
purpo~es.
5. 7hat trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on fiie with the Office of the Director of Public Works.
E. 7hat fire hydrants shall be installcd and charged, as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the F;re Department, prior to comme~cement
of structural framing.
7. That subjec[ property shall be served by underground utilities.
8. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the Cfty Engineer.
9. That the otoner(s) of subJect property shall pay to thc Ci[y of Anaheim
the approPriate park and recreation in-lieu fecs as determined to be appropriate by
the CitY Councii, said fees to be paid at the time the bullding ~crmit is issued.
iQ. Prior to the introduc[ton of an ordinance rezoning subjec[ property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, above nentioned, shall be compleced. The provisions or
rights 9~anted by this resolution shall hecome null and void by action of the
Planning Commissicn unless said conditions are complfed oiith oiithin one year from the
datp hereof, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
11. That Condition Nos. 5, 7 and 3, above mentioned, shall be canp)ted with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
i~. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibits 1, 2
and 3, and that any modifications thereto shall bc submitted to the Planning
Commission for revierr and approval prior to Che lssuance of buildin9 permtts.
THE FnRFsQ~Nf, RFSOlUTION ts si9ned and approved by me this 13th day of
February, 197$,
~.-~~"~ ~~o
CHAIRNAN, ANAHEIN CITY PLANNIPIf C011MISSION
ATTcST:
'!n LC1ry /~ - (~dN~-t.si
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CfTY PLA~~NING COMMISSION
-3- PC~B-26
± 1 1
STATE OF CALIfORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORAPIGE ) ss.
CITY OF ADIAHEiM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim Lity Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission heid on February 13, 197t3, at ?:30 p.m „ by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARMES, DAVID, HERBST, JOHNSOFl, KING, LINN, TOLAR
NOES: COM!115510tJERS: t~ONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIO~JERS: NONE
1978.
I!1 HITNESS WHEREOF, I have nereu~to set my hand this 13th day of February,
~~~~, ~ ~~~~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY LAN~~lNG COMPif5SI0N
_y_ rc7a-26