PC 78-260
RESOLUT101~ IIO. PC78-2G~
A RESOL.UT1011 OF THE At1AHEIM LITY PLaNtJING CO"1HISSION
TNAT PETITION FOR COHDITIOIIAL USE PERMIT N0, 1915 BE GRANTE~
HtiER[AS, the Anaheim City Planning Corrxnission did receive a verified
Pet(tion for Conditional Use Pcrmit from EAGIE ftEAITY COt1PAyY, 5!745 uflshire
~oulevard, Los Angeles, California, 4003~, owner, and BOB DEF. BIflD, 16133 Woodruff
Avenue, 9ellflower, California 90705, a9ent, of certain real propcrty situated in the
City of Anahelm, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
Parcel 2, as shown on a Parcel Map filed in Eook 3E, Page 1a of
Parcei Maos, Records of Oranqe County.
WHEREAS, the City Pl~nning Lomnission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hafl in the C(ty of Anaheim an November 2Q, 1~73, a[ 1:3o p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly gfven as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Lode, Chapier 18.03, [o hear and consider
evidence for and agains[ saiJ proposed conditional use and [o lnvestigaie and make
findings and recommenclations in connection thereWith; and
WHEREAS, said Cor.xnission, after due inspection, invest(9ation and siudy made
by itself anci tn its beh~lf, and af[er due considera[lon of all evidence and reporis
oifered at said hearing, does find and detcrmine thc following facts:
1. That the proposeJ use is properiy one for which a condiiionai use
permit is au[horized by Anaheim `funicipal Gode Sectlon 18.41+.050.170 [o wit: to
permit a board and care facility for the elderly.
2. That the proposed use wfll not adversely affect the adjotning land uses
and [he gro;r[h anJ Jevetopr:~ant of Ci~e area in whicii it is proposeJ to be iocated.
3. That the size and shape of the stte propcsed for the use ts adequate [o
allow the full devclopment of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to [he peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the C(tizens
of the C(ty of Anahcim.
4 Th~t tlie 9ranting of the Condittonai Use Pernit under the condittons
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to thc peace, health. safety and general
welfare of the Citizen5 of the Clty of Anaheim.
S. Thet no one indtcated their presence at said pubiic hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondenca was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
ENVIRO~IHEt~TAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim C(ty Planning Commission has
revie~.ed the proposal to permit a board and care facility for the elderly and to
amend the coidltions of approval in connectlon with reclasstfication of property
PC78-2bD
consistiny of approxtmately 2.4 acres located south and west of thc southrrest corner
of Vermont Avenuc and tinaheim Boulevard, having approxtnate frontages of 230 feet on
the south sidc of Vermont Avenue and ?.23 feet on the west side of Anahefm Boulevard,
ar,d being located approximately 1$j fr_<< south of the cen[erline of Vermont Avenue
anri 170 feet west of th~ centerline of Anahaim Eoulevard; and does hereby approve the
Negative Deciaration from the requiremcnt to prepare an environmental impact repori
on the basl~ that there would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due tc :he approval of this Negative Declaration since Lhe
Anaheim General Pia~ desfonates the subject property for gene.ral camercial land uses
commensurate wiih the proposal; [hat no sensi[ive environmental impacts are involved
in thc proposal; Chat tfie fnitial Study submitted by ihe petitioner indicates no
siqnifican[ individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the
Nega[ive Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings (s on ftle in the Lity of
Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thac the Anaheim City Plannfng Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Usc Pcrm([, upon the following
conditlons which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite Co the proposed use
of the subJect property in ordcr to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the cwner(s) of subJect property shali oay the cortxnercial Lrafffc
signaT assessment fee (Council Pollcy No. 21t}) amounting to 5130.00 per T000 square
feet of cortmerciai b~•iiding or fraction Chereof prtor to the issuance of a building
permit.
2. That subjcct property shall be develooed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifltations on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit 4os. i
and 2.
BE IT FIIRTfiER RESOLVED that the Anaheim C(ty Plannin9 Commission does hereby
find and determine thac adoption of [his Resolution is expressiy predicated upon
~FFjt~an['s compliance wi[li eacn and ali of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condi[ion, or any part thereof, be deciared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any cour[ of competent Jurisdiction, then this Resolutlon,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be dcemed nuli and void.
THE FOREGOING RE50 WT~ON is si^~eu 4~~ approved by me this 20th day of
November, 1Q78,
CH IR A, A AHE ITY P NN IIG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECfETARY, AtlAHE~M CITY LA~ININf CONMISSION
~ i f
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
1, Ed1th L. Harris, 5ecretary of the Anaheim City PlannTng Commissio~, do
hereby certffy that the foregoing resolution was passed and adop[ed at a mee[ing of
the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon held on November 20, 197II, at 1:30 p,m., by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMM1551011ER5: BUSHORE, DAVID, HER45T, KING, TOLAR
NOES: COMM15510t~ER5: NONE
ABSENT: CONMiS5101~ER5: SARNES, JOHhISON
IN NITNE55 NHEREOF, I have hereun;o set my hand [his 20th day of November,
1978.
`~,1..~-l. ,r.° ~~
SECRETARY~ ANAl1EtH Ct~Y PLAttY.I~tG COMfltS510N