Loading...
PC 78-262RESOLUTION N0. PC78'262 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOt~ THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIfILATION N0. 78-7~-18 RE GRANTED. WHEREAS~ the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified petition for Reclassification from VELMA GODARD AND AtJNA VAN HEEMST, 250 East Telegraph Road, Filmore, California 93Q15, owners, and THE BARiSIC COMPANYsituatedutn Western Avenue, AnaheLounty,of~Oran e285tate ofcCalifornian describedeasYfollows: the CiCy of Anaheim, 9~ tha Y~Per HARRY TOD PARCEL - That portion of B~ 7 S Californ~a of State Linda Tract in the County of Orange, in the recorded in eook 5, Pages 17, 18 of Miscellaneous Maps ma f p office of the County P.ecorder of sald County and Chat portion o nd made land allotted to F. Yorba according to a~ o attached to a Ana art of Decree of Partltion of the Rancho C~non de Santa f the 17th. Judictal Dtstrict Court of N 78 1 C r o. 9 o ase endered in a certtfled copy of which is recarded in Book 28, Page California , 15$ of Deeds in ihe office of the Lounty Recorder of Los Angeles lifornia, C S a ta[e of County, located in the County oT Orange, the ~ ~ t cor Tr rC as o Described as follows: Be9inning at map Per f Oran 6733 in the Cicy of Anahe(m, County 9e, N o. recorded in Book 337, Pages 13 E 14 of Miscellaneous Maps in the 4 3g'S7'~E office of the County Recorder of said Lounty; thence S S 266.04 feet to a point on the Nester~Y ~y^P~ ~ the f ac o o ongatlon point beti9 the intersection of the Eastof~said Yorba Linda Tract; k 35 SouthP'iy line of Lot 7, Bloc Westerly along said Southerly line N 80 38'09"N 187.36 feet [hcnce to a point on a line parallel with and dista~t 50.Q0 feet Easterly i s of the Cente~line of Lakeview Avenuc as said Centerline 695 described in Deed recorded fn Book 9112, Pages 6°Q to inclusive, records of sald County, saiJ point being on a curve 00 feet, a a radius of 115~ • concave tJorthwesterly and having dial line to said point bears N 7y 1o'43"W; thence Northeasterly ra along said parallel line and along said curve 156.57 feet through N 23 a central angle of 7 54'02"; thence tangent to sata curve rtherly tl o y3~~9~~E 97,70 feet to the Uesterly prolongation of the atd line of sald Tract Flo. 6733; thence 5 86 51~pg"E along s prolongated line 70.50 fect to the polnt of begi~ntng. WHEREAS, the City P1anning Commisslon did hold a public hearing at tice of sal the City d public Hall in the Clty of Anaheim on November 20, 1978. at ~~30 p.m., no uired by faw and in accordance d l t with the u ven as req y g hearing havfng been f the Anaheim Munlcipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear a~d consider provisions o for and against sald praposed rectassificatlon and to investigate and make evidence findings and recort+mendations in connection therewith; and Pc78-z62 WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspectton, investi9atlon and study made by itself and in its behadoesafindfa~d determinedihetfollowing,factsence and repor[s offered at said hearing, ~, That the petitioner proposes reclassificatlon of subject property from the County of Orange A-1 (General, Agricultural) Diftrict to the City of Anahetm RS- 5000 (Residential, Single-Family) Zone. Z, That the Anaheic~ General P',n designates subJect property for low- medium density residential land uses. j, Tha[ the proposed reclassification of subject property is nrcessary and/or desirable for the orderiy and proper develoPmen[ of the community. 4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones anandhtor[herzonesdandetheiraPermitted1usesdgenerally established to subject property throughout [he community. 5, That the propased reclassificatlon of subject proper[y requlres the improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, due to the anticlpated increase in traffic wfiich will be generated by Che inte~sification of land use. 6. That no one indicated thelr presencP at sald public hearing fn opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the suEject petitlon. EIlVIROtlMENTAL IMPALT ~!~~DING: Thac the Anaheim City Planning Conxnission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify the zoning from County A-1 (General, Agricul[ural) to Gity RS-5000 (Residential, Single-Famtly) zone on an irregularly- shaped parcei of land consisting of approximately 0.7 acre, having a frontage of approximatelY 223 feet on the West side of Bubach Sireet, havin9 a maximum depth oF approximately 70 feet, a~d being located approximateiy 560 feet norLh of Lhe centerline of Orangethor~e Avenue; an~ does herehy approve the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there would be no significant tndividual or cumulative adverse environmental i~pact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anr~heim Generat Plan designates Che subJect property for low-medlum density residential land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensittve environmental 'smpacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initiai Study submitted 6y the petltioner ind(cates no significant individual or cumulative adverse envTronmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the Ctty of Anaheim Planning Department. NOW, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm City Planntng Carniission does hereby grant subJect Petltion for Reclassificatton and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anahelm Municipal Code be ame~ded to exclude the above-described property from the LOUintoA theCERS-~5000 G(RESIDENTIAL?oNSINGLE-FAHILY)c~ZONEauponsthe described property -2- PC78-262 ~ i followTng conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subJect property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: ~, That street lighting facilities along Bubach Street shall be installed prior to finat building and zontng inspections unless otherwise approved by thie Director of Pubiic Utilities, and in accordance with standard specifica[lons on file In the Office of the Director of Public Utilities; or that a bond, certificate of deposit. letter of credtt, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee that the above improvements will be installed prior to occupancy. Z, That sidewalks shall be installed along Bubach Street as required by the~ Clty Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specificat.ions on file tn the Office of [he City Engineer. 3, That fire hydrants shall be ins[ailed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior Co commencement of structural framing. 4, That the developer shall acqutre access rights across the one-foot holding strip on the west side of Bubach Street. 5, That the vehicular access ri9hts to Lakevtew Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 6, That these reclassification proceedings are granted subject to completion of annexation of subject property Co the City of Anaheim. ~, That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay appropriate drainage assessment fees to the City of Anahelm as dete~mined by the City Engi~eer prlor to issuarsce of a buiiding permii, $, That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal assessment fee (Council Poticy No, 214) amountl~9 to $36.00 per each new dwelling unTt prlor to the issuance of a building permit. y, Prior to the introductlon of an ordinance rezoning subJect property~ Condition Nos. 1. 4, 5 a~d 6, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provlslons or rights granted by this resolution shalt becomc null and vold by action of the Planntng Commission unless sald condittons are complied with withTn one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the Planning GommTssTon may grant. ~p, That ConditTon No. 2, above-menttoned, shall be comPlied with prior to final butiding and zonin9 inspections. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Clty Planning Commissio~ does hereby find and determine that adoption of thls Resolutlon is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions herelnabove set forth. Should any such conditlon, or any part thereof, be decla~ed lnvalid or unenforceable -3- Pc78-262 ~ bY the final Judgment of any court of competent Jurisdiction, then this Resolutton~ and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOIJ is signed and approved by me this 20th day of November, 1978. ~ tl. A AHE 7Y PLANNIIIG COMMISSION ATTEST: . ~ ~ SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CIT PLANNING COMMiS510N STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUt~TY OF ORANGE ) ss. C~TY OF ANAHEIM ) ~, Ed(th L. Harris, Secr~[ary of the Anaheim City Planntng Comnission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adapted at a meeting of [he Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission held on November 70, 1978, a[ 1:30 p.m., by ihe following vote of thc members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BUSHORE, DAVIO, HEft65T, Y,ING, TOALP. NOES: COMMi5510NERS: NOtJE ABSENT: COMt415510hER5: BARNES, JOHt7501~ 1978 ~~~ NITkESS NHEP,EOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 20th day of November. `~~, ,z' 2~,~. SECRETARY, ANANEIM CITY PLANNING LOHMISSION -4- PC78-262