PC 78-265RESOLUTION P~O. PC 3d-265
RESOLUTION OF THE ANAffEIM CITY PLANNIN9 COMrfI5510N
THAT PETITION fOR VARIANCE N0. 3063 BE GP.ANTED
MMEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission dId recelve a verifled
Petition for Variance from PP,OPERTIES LINITED, 1315 East St. Andrews Place, Suite B,
Santa Ana, Californta 92705, owners, of certain real property situated tn the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Calffornia described as:
That por[fon of the Llest half of Lot 2 in Block 14 of [he Golden
State Tract and that portion of the East half of Lot 1 in Elock 13
of the Golden State Tract as shown on a Hap recorded in book !~~
pages 66 and 67 of Mtscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County,
Catifornia, described as follows: Parcels 1 to 15 as shown on a
Map filed tn book 124, page 23 of Parcel Maps, in the office of
the Lounty Recorder of Orange Lounty, California.
NHEREAS~ the City Planning Canmission dtd hold a publ(c hearing at the City
Hall In the Lity of Anaheim on November 20, 1978, at 1:30 p.m.. no[ice of said pubiic
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
Provisions of the Anaheim Municipai Code, Chapter 18,p3, to hear and consider
evidence for and a9ainst said prop~sed varlance and to investiga[e and make findings
and recommendations in connection thererrlth; and
WNEREAS, said Ccmmission. after due inspectton, )nvesti9ation and study made
by Ttself and in its behalf, and afrer due constderation of all evldence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine thc foilowing facts:
~, That the peti[lo~~er proposes a waiver of the followtng to retain an 8-
foot high block wall:
SECTION 18.61.064.020 - Maximum wall hei ht.
2-1 2 cet permitted in fron[ 50-foot setback;
eet ex sting)
2, That the praposed walver ~s hereby granted subJect to the condition
that [he 8-foot high wall shall be constructed substanttally in accordance with the
exhibjt (an archi[ect's rendering) presented at tAe public heartng.
3, That che abovc-mentloned rratver is hereby granted on the basis that the
Planning Commlssion determined tha[ the existtng wa11 is part of the landscaping
because an approximately 6-foot hlgh landscaped earthern berm screens the wall along
Miraloma Avenue and only permi[s approxlmateiy 3o inches of the subJect wall to be
vfsible.
4, That there are exceptiongl or extraordinary circumstances or condttions
appitcable to the property involved or to the Intended use of the Property that do
noi apply generally to the property or class of use 1~ the sane vicinity and zone.
PC78-2G5
5, That the requested variance 1s necessary for the p~eservation and
enJoyment of a substantial property right possessed by o[her property in the same
vicinity and zone, and denicd to the property ~~ question.
~, That the requested variance will not be matcrially detrimental to the
publlc welfare or InJurious to tfie property or inprovemen[s in such vicinlty and zone
in whicl~ ~Fie property is located.
~, That no one indicated their prasence at said public heartng Tn
oppositlon; and that no correspondence was received tn opposi[lon to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONME~JTAL IMPACT FINDI~IG: 7he Planning Director or his authorized
representa[ive has determ ned that the proposed proiect fails within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Classes 1 and 5, as defined in Paragraph Z of the City of
Anaheim Environmental Impac[ Report Guidellnes and is, therefore, categorically
exempt from the requlremen[ to prepare an EIR.
NOW, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that thc Anaheim Ci[y Planning Co~nnission
does hereby gr~nt subject Petition for Variance, upon che following ~~~~itions whtch
are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite co the proposed use of the subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general we)fare oF the ~it~Zens of ihe
Ci[y of Anahcim:
~, 7hat subJect property shalt be developed substan[fally in accordance
with plans and specifica[lons on fiie with the City of Anahetn rtwrked Exhibit llos. 1~
2 and 3(an architect's rendering submitted at che pubiic hearing).
gF IT FURTHE? RESOLVED [hat thc Anaheim CI[y Planning Commission Joes hereby
find and determinc that adop[ion of this Resolution is expressly P-'edicated upon
~PPlicant's c~^Piiance with each and ail of the condttions hereinabove set for[h.
Should any sucfi condition, or any part [hereof. be declared invattd or unenforceable
bY the final Jud9ment of any court of competent jurisdiction. then this Resolution,
anci any approvals hcrcin contained, shall be deemed ~ull and void.
THE fOREG0ING RESOLUTIOtI is signed and approved by me [his 20th day of
November, 1978•
N. A ~~ p IIN6 COMMISSION
ATTEST: _
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM LITY PLANNING COHMISSIQN
-2- PC78-265
t, ; /
STATE OF CALIFORNIA I
COUNTY OF ORAWGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM ~
I, Edith ~. Harris, Secretary of thc Anaheim City Ptanning ~~isston, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a mee[ing of
the Anaheim City Planning CaRnlssion held on Nov~nber 20. 1978~ at 1:34 P•m,, by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: CONMISSIONERS: BUSHORE. OAVID, HERBST, KING~ TOL11R
NOES: COMHISSIOP~ERS: NOtJE
ABSENT: COfiHI5510NERS: BARNES, JOIINSO~~
1978.
IN WITNE55 11FIEREOF~ 1 have hereunto set my hand this 20th day of 4ovember,
~~~ 1~ ~~p.w.~,
SECRETARY, :11AHE1M LITY PLAt141NG COHNiSStON
_3_ p~78-265