PC 78-276RESOLUTIO~~ N0. PC78-276
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEI~1 CITY PLA~INING COHMISSION
THAT PETITIO~~ FOR RELLASSIFICATION N0. 77-78-64 BE GRANTED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Cortwnission did reccive a verified
petition for Reclassiftcation from MABEL J, BRUER AND UNITED CALIFORNIA 9ANK, 707
Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles~ Californla 90051, owners, and KENT LAND COMPANY,
17881 Sky Park North, Irvinc, Caltfornia 92714, agen[, of certaln real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Callfornia, described as
foliows:
PARCEL 1: Those portions of Lots 1, 2 and 6 of Tract No. E6~, as
per map recorded in Book 28, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps,
records of Orange Cou~ty, California, and a portion of the land
allotted to Manuel Feliz and wife, as described in the final
Decree of Par[ition of [he Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana~ which was
entered September 12, 1868 in Book "B", Page 410 of Judgcments of
Distrtct Court of thc 17th Judfcial Districi ir. and for Los
Angeles County, California, alt tn the Coun[y of Orange, State of
Calffornia, described as follows: Be9inning at the most sotherly
corner of said Tract No. 865; thence, along the Southeasterly
prolongation of the southwesterly line of said Tract South 26°
29' 10" East 1029.3h feet; thence, North 39° Q5' S5" West
3576.20 feet to the easterly line of that certain parcel of land
described in a deed to the Southern California Edison Company,
recorded April "o, 1971 in Book 95°~. Page 893, of Of~icial
Records, records of said Orange County; thence, along sa~d
easterly line North i° 30' n9" Vest 18q2,17 feet to an angle
point therein; thence, cantinuing along said easteriy line North
23~ 17' 42" East 1391.25 feet to the southerly line of Parcel C-
2616-1 described in the Final Ordcr of Condemnation, Case No.
166019, a certified copy of which was recorded Octo6er 14. 1970 in
Book 9431, Pa9e 619, of Official Records, records of satd Orange
County; ihence, alon9 said southerly line Nor[h 79° 23' 43" East
171.36 feet to an angle point theretn; thence, continutng along
said soucheriy line the foliowing bearings and dis[ances; "7o~th 77°
16' 13" East 738.76 feet; South $2° 38' S2" East 279.80 feet;
South 54° 39' 26" East 376.96 feet; South 49° 43~ 41" East
361.57 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave
northeasterly and having a radius of 1030,00 feei, a radial line
of satd curve [h~ough said point 6ears South 40° 16' 19" West;
thence, continuing along said souiherly line through a central
angle of 12~ 32' 07" along the arc of said curve Southeasterly
225.34 feet; thence, continuin9 aton9 said southerly line South 88 °
31' S6" East 128.28 feet to [he beginning of a non-tangent curve,
concave northerly and havin9 a radius of 960.00 fe~t, a radial
line of said curve through sa(d point bears South 19° 37' 16"
Wes[; thence, continuing along sald southerly ltne through a
central angle of 40~ 54' Q2" along the arc of sald curve Eas[erly
685.30 feet; thence, contfnuing along said sou[herly line the
following bearin~s and distances; North 61° 34' 36" East 310.48
feet; North 60 55' 47" East 100.00 feet; South 29° 04' 13"
East 20,00 fee[; North 60° 55' 47" East 242.57 feet; North 22°
PC78-276
!
48' 37" East 268.82 feet; North 11° 23' S8" East 253.21 feet to
the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave southeasterly and
having a radius of 440.00 feet, a radial line of satd curve
through said p~Int bears North 7~i° 04' 13" West; thence,
continuing along sald southerly line through a central angle of
43° 32' 18" along the arc of said curve Northeasterly 33~.35
feet; thence, continuing along said southerly llne the following
bearings and distances; South 72° ~+6' 38" East 384.42 feet; South
86° 09~ 39~~ East 183,67 feet; North 67° 03' 45" East 447.50 fect
to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave southwesterly and
having a radius of 4785.00 feet, a radial line of said curve
through said poini bears North 6° 44' 07" East; thence,
continuing along said southerly line through a central angle of 15°
28' 12" along the arc of said curve Southeasterly 1291.96 feet;
thence, conf(nuing along said southerly line South 47° 44' 24"
East 223.57 feet to the northeasterly line of that cer[ain parcel
of land described as "Parcel 1" in a deed recorded February 4,
lgki in Book 1074, Page 564 of Official Records, records of satd
Orangc County; thence, along said northeasCerly line South 24°
G7' 10" East 667.79 fee[ to a point tn the southea~terly line of
said Tract No. 865; thence. along said southeasterly line South 63°
51' OS" West 4128.20 feet to the point of beginning.
PARCEL 2: That portion of Lot 6 of Tract 865, as per map recorded
in Book 28, Page 18 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange
County, California, togethcr with chat portion of the land
allo[ted to Manuei Feliz and wife, as described in the Ftnal
Decree of Partit(on of the Fiancho Santiago de Santa Ana, which was
entered Sep[ember 12, 1868, In Dook "8", Page 410 of Judgements of
District Court of the 17th Judiciat District in and for Los
Angeles County, Californla, all in the Couniy of Orange, State of
California, described as follows: Beginning at the Northerly
terminus of course No. 29, as described in the Ftnal Order of
Condemnation, Case No. 15601?, a certified copy of which was
recorded October 14, 1970, in Book ?431, Page 619 of Offictal
Records, as having a bearing and distance of North 29° Oh' 13"
West 140.00 feet; thence South 60° 55' 47" West 85.00 feet to the
Truc Pofnt of Qeginning; thence South 60° 55` 47" West 115.00
fee[ to the beginning of a curve concave Northeas[erly havtng a
radius of 810.00 feet; thence Northwe~terly 980.30 feet along safd
curve through a central angle of 69° 20' 32";thence North 490
43' 41~' Nest 361.57 feet to the beginning of a curve concave
Southwesterly having a radius of B90.OQ feet; thence Northwesterly
57~.46 fee[ along satd curve through a central angle of 370 14'
Z3" to a polnt on a non-tangent line a radial to satd point bears
5outh 03° Oi' S6" West; thence North 81~ 52' 12" East 470.28
feet to a poin[ on a non-tangent curve concave Southwesterly
having a radlus of 700.00 feet a radia) to said point bears North
04° 15' 10" WesC; thence Southeasterly 355.39 feet along sald
curve through a central angle of 29° 05' 21"; thence South 65~
09' 49" East 253.58 feet to the beglnning of a curve concave
NortheasCerly havtng a radtus of 600.00 feet; thence Easterly
564.61 feet along sald curve through a central angle of 53° 54'
2A"; thence North 60° 55' 47" East 15.00 feet; thence South 290
0~+' l3" East 460.00 feet to the True Potnt of Beglnntng.
-2- Pc7a-276
PARCEL 3: Those portlons of Lots 1 and 6 of Tract No. 865, in the
County of Orange~ State of Californta, as shown on a map recorded
in Book 28, Pa9e 18 nf Miscellaneous Maps, Tn the office of the
County Recorder of sald County, described as follows: Beginning
at the Easterly terminus of course No. 13, as described in the
Final Order of Condemnation Case No, t660i9, a certified copy of
whtch was recorded October 14, 1970 in Book 943~, Page 61~, of
Official Records, as South 60° 5;' -i7" West iQ0.00 feet; thence
South 60~ 55' 47" West 50.00 feet alang said course; thence North
2~ 04' 13" West 140.00 feet; thence North 60° 55~ 47" East
80.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence ~lorth 60° 55'
1i7" East 120.00 feet to the beginning of a curve concave
Northwesterly having a radtus of 310.00 feet; thence Northeasterly
2W3.37 feet through a centrat angie of 45° 00' 00"; thence North
15~ 55' 47" East 252.42 feet Co the beginning of a curve concave
Southeasterly havtng a radlus of 540.00 feet; thence ~~ortheasterly
28Z.59 feet along said curve through a cen[ral angle of 61° 48'
54": thence Soutli a3° 41' 37" Nest 344.72 feet; thence South 66°
44' 35" West 539.49 feet to the beginning of curve concave
Southeasterly having a radtus of 150.00 feet; thence Southwesterty
209.25 feet along said curve through a central an91e of 79° 55'
43"; tlience South 13° il' OB" East ba.85 fee[; thence South
25° 42' 13" East 426.42 fee[ to che True Pot~t of Beginning.
WHEREAS, the City Plannin9 Commission did schedule a pubiic hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim on June 18, 1978, at 1:3Q P.m., notic~ of said
public hearing having been duly gfven as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, [o hear and consJder
evidence for and a9ainst sald proposed reclassification and to irtvestigate and make
findin9s and recommendations in connection therewi[h; said public hearing having been
continued [o the Planniny Ca:mission meeting of December 4, 1978; and
WHEREAS, said Commission after due inspection, inves[i9ation and study made
by its~lf and in its behalf, and after due considera[ion of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determtne [he following facts:
t. That the petitioner proposes pre-annexation zoning of subject proper[y
from the County of Orange A1 (General Agriculturai) District to the City oF Anaheim
PC(SC) (Planned Cormnunity-Scenic Corrtdor Ove~lay) Zone.
2. That thc Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for hillside
estate density residenttal, htilside low denstty restdentlal. hiliside iow-medtum
density residential, hitlside medium density residential, aeneral commercial, general
open space, and for public facilities.
3. That the proposed reclassiflcatian of subJect property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderiy and proper developmenC of the commu~lty.
4, 7hat the proposed rectassification of subJect property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally estabiished in close prox~mity
to subJect property and to the zones and their permttted uses generally established
throughout the communliy.
5. Tha[ the proposed rectassificatiors of subJect property requTres the
dedication and improveme~t of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulatton
-3- PC78-27b
PARCEL 3~ Those portlons of Lots i and 6 of Tract No. 865, in the
County of Orange, 5tate of Californla~ as shown on a map recorded
in Book 28, Page 18 of Miscellancous Maps, in the office of the
County Recorder of said County. destribed as foltows: Beginning
at the Easterly terminus of course No. 13, as described in the
Final Order of Condemnation Case No. 166019, a certified copy of
which rras recorded Ociober lk, 1970 in Book °431, Page 61?, of
Official Records, as South 60° 55' 47" Nest 1~0.0~ feet; thence
South 60° SS' 47" West 50.00 feet along said course; thence North
2~ 04' 13" West 140.00 feet; thence North 60° 55' ~7" East
80,00 feet to the True Polnt of Beginning; thence Nor[h 60° SS'
47" East 120.00 feet to the beginning of a curve concave
Northwesterly having a radius of 310.00 fcet; thence Northeasterly
2W3,37 feet [hrough a centra) angle of 45° 00' 00"; thence North
15° 55' 47" East 252.42 feet to the beginning of a curve ~oncave
Southeas:erly having a radius of 540.00 feet; thence Northeasterly
z82.59 feet atong said curve through a central angle of 61° k8'
54"; thence South a3° 41' 37" West 3~4.72 feet; thence South 66°
44' 35" West 539.49 feet to the be9inning of curve concave
Southeasterly haviny a radius of 150.00 feet; thence Southwesteriy
209,25 feet along said curve through a central angle of 79° 55'
~3"; [hence South 13~ 11' 08" Eas[ 60.85 feet; thence South
25° 42' 13" East 426.w2 feet to the 7rue Potnt of Beginning.
WFlEREAS, the City Plannir.g Commission did schedui~ a public hearing at the
Ci[y Hall in the City of Anahetm on June 18, 1g78, ~t 1:3Q p.m., rtotice of said
public hearing having been duly glven as requtred by law anci in accordance wi[h the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Ghapter 18.03, to hear a~d consider
evidence for and against sald proposed reclassifica[lon and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; said publtc hearing having been
con[tnued to the Planniny Conmission meeting of Decem6er 4, 1978; and
uHEREAS, sald Commission after due inspection, lnvestiga[ian and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due conslderaxlan of all evidence and reports
offered a[ said hearing, docs find and determine the. foliowing facts:
1. That :he petitioner proposes pre-annexation zoning of subjcct property
from the County of Orange A1 (Gene~al Agriculiural) Dtstrict to ihe City of Anahetm
PC(SC) (Planned Community-Scenfc Corridor Overlay) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subJect property for h(llside
estate density residentlal, hiliside low density residential, hiliside low-medium
density residential, hilistde medium density residential, general commercial, general
open space~ and for publlc facilltles.
3. That the proposed reclassifTcation of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderty and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassirication of subject property does properly
relate to the zunes and thel~ permitted uses locatly estabiished fn close proximity
to subJect nroperty and to the zones and their pcrmitted uses generally establlshed
throughout the cortmunlty.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subJect property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the CtrculatTon
-3- PC78-27~
~ _' ` ~
Element of the General Plan, due to [he anticipated increase in traffic which will
be generated by the intensification of land use.
6. Thai numerous persons indicated their presence at said public hearing
in opposition; and that correspondence was recelved in opposi[lon to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That on November 2f1~ i?73, the Anaheim City
Ptanning Commission reviewed Env ronmental Impact Report No. 21b for the General Plan
Development of the Bauer Ra~ch and the evidente, both written and oral, presented at
that tlme to supplement draft EIR No. 216, and found that potent(al project-qenerated
environmentai impacts were reduced to an tnsiginificant level by the conformance with
City Plans, policies and ordinances; tha[ draft EIR No. 216 was determined to be (n
cornplicnace wfth the Californla Environmental Quality Act and wi[h City and S[ate EIR
Guidelines; and, therefore~ based upon such information, the Anaheim Lity Planning
Commission did certify EIR No. 216.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that [he Anaheim Lity Ptanning Corrrnission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and~ by so doing, that Title
18-Zoning of the Anahefm Municipal Code be amended to exclude tfie above-described
property from the County of Orange A1 (GENERAL AGRICULTURAL) D157RICT and to
tncorporate satd described property into the City of Anahetm PC(SC) (PLANNED
COMMUNITY-SCEt~IC CORR(DOfi OVERLAY) Z6NE upon the followin9 condttfons which are
hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite [o the proposed use of subject property
in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of thc City of
Anaheim:
t. That [hese reclassification proceedings are granted subjec[ to the
completion of annexation of subject property [o the Ctty of Anaheim.
2. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each
parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel; provided~
however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently exis[ing parcels of record and
any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split.
3. That the number of dweiling units per acre proposed (in connection with
tract maps, parcel maps, or other development pla~s) for each land use area in the
Bauer Ranch Planned Communtty may be equal to but shall not exceed the average
densi[y as approved in the Bauer Ranch General Plan of Developmen[ unless such
proposal to transrer dwelling un(ts between or within land use areas is submitted to
and approved by [he Planning CommissTon. °lans for any proppsed transfer of dweliing
units shall ident(fy the land use areas affected and shall specify both the approved
and the proposed dwelling untt co~nts in all affec[ed land use areas. The total
dwelling untt count in the Bauer Ranch Planned Lortmuntty shall no[ exceed 900.
4. Tha[ prior to the introduction of an ordinance to establlsh zontng on
each specific parcei or parcels within the Pianned Community, and in accordance wlth
the provisions of the "PC" Planned Communicy Zone, there shall be submttted to [he
City Plann(ng CommissTon for revtew and approvat specific plans nf development for
[he area(s) involved. Finai specific plans shall Include, but not be ifmited to, the
following:
a. Topographic map
b, Site plans and elevations:
structures; the front, side
building materlals, including
showing the placement of the bulldings and
and rear elevations; and the cxterior
roofing.
-4- PC78-276
° I I
c. Lot dimens(ons and pad size of all lots sufficleni to indicate the
relationship of the proposal to the nature and ex[ent of the cut-and-
flll or earthwork invoived.
d. Landscaping plans: indicating the extent and type of proposed
landscap)ng and tncluding any existing vegetation.
e. Vehtcle ctrculation and parking plan: Indica[ing the nature and exteni
of public and private streets, public alleys, or public access~ays for
vehicular circulatlon, off-street parktng and vehicte storage.
f. Eques[rian and hiking trails plan: showing the placement and
improvements of thc trails easements.
g. Fence and/or wal) plans: indicating the type of fencing along any lot
line of a site abutting a strcet, river, creek, open storm dratn, lake,
railroad, or other works.
fi. Signin9 pians: indicatin9 the proposed slgning program and Including.
but not limlted to, any identification, business or other signs; and
sp~cifyiny the size, height, location~ color, ~aterlal and lighting of
such signs.
5. That dedication of all public s[reets including arierlal highways shall
be made to the Ctty of Anaheim in accordance with the submitted Circulation Element
of the Bauer Ranch Genera! Plan of Development and Ni[h the adopted Circulation
Element of the Anaheim General Plan.
G. That dedica[lon of vehicular access rights except at approved access
polnts to Santa Ana Canyon Road and Neir Canyon Road sha11 be made to the Ctty of
Anahe(m prior to the approval of flnai specific deHelopment plans for each parcel.
Such pians include but are not ltmiied to tract maps~ parcel maps, and butlding
permit plans.
7. Tha[ dedicatlon of Equestrlan and HiY.ing Tratis Easements shall be made
in accordance with the adopted Equestrian and Hiki~a Trails Element of the Anahein
General Plan; and that said trails shall be improved in eccordance wi[h plans and
spectfications on file in the office of the Clty Engineer, prior to the appraval of
final specific development plans for each parcel.
E. That in accordance with Council Po)icy No. 214 pertaining to Traffic
Signal Assessments, traffic signal fees shal) be paid prior [o the issuance of a
building permit.
9. That trash storage areas sh~ll be provided in accordane~ „•T;h apprc ~d
plans on file wtth the office of the Direccor of Public Works.
10, That prior to any water connections in the Bauer Ranch Pla~~:~ed
Cormunity, the developers of said planned community (Kaufman and Broad, inc, or Cheir
successors~ assigns, or [ransferees) shall submft to the Director of Pubitc Utilities
for his review and approval~ a proposed plan for the acreage payment of riater main
extension fees. Said plan shall consider all land within the Ba~er Ranch Planned
Comnunity including open space.
ii. That ftre hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chlef of the Fire Department prior ta cormencement
of structural framtng.
-5- PC78-276
._ _~
12. Thae all requtrements of Fire Zone 4(otherwise Identifted as Ftre
Administrative Order No. 76-01 on flic in the office of the Flre Chief) shall be met.
Such requirements include~ bu[ are not limited to: Chimney spark arrestors,
protected attic and under floor openings, Class C or better roofing material and one
hour fire resistive canstruction of horizontal surfaces tocated within 200 feet of
adJacent brushland.
13. That fuel breaks shall be provided as determined to be required by the
Fire Chlef.
14. That no public or private streei grades shall exceed 10$ except by
prior approval of the Fire Department and the Engineerina Divtsfon.
15. That in accordance wtth the policies of the Fire Department, native
slopes (as discussed tn ChapCer 17,06 "C,rading, Excavatlons and Fills in Hillside
Areas" of the Anahein Municipai Code) located adJacent to newly constructed homes
shall be hydroseeded wi[h a low fuei combustible seed mix. Such slopes shall be
sprinklcred and wecded as required to establish 100 feet separaElon of flammable
ve9etatio~ from a~y structure.
16. That subject property shall be served by undcrground ucilities.
17. That drafnage of satd property shall be dTsposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer, If, (h the preparation of the site, suff(cient
gradin9 is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on gradtng wlll be
permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all required off-sE[e drainage
facilities have been installed and are operattve. Positive assurance shall be
provided Che City that such drainage facilities wtll be completed prior to October
iStfi. Necessary right-of-way for off-site drainage facflities shall be dedicated to
the Ctty, or the City Council shall have initiated condemnation proceedings therefor
(the costs of xhich shall be borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of
grading operations. The required drainage facilities shai) be of a size and [ype
sufficient [o carry runoff waters originating from higher propertfes through said
property to ultimate disposal as approved hy [he Ci[y Engineer, SaId drainage
facilities shall be the ftrst i[em of constructton and shall be completed and be
functtonal throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the property to
the ultimate poin[ of dtsposal prior to the issuance of any final building
Tnspections or occupancy permits. Drainage dfstrict reimbursement agreements may be
made available to the developcrs of said property upon their request. The ultimate
point of disposal shall be the Santa Ana Rtver and any deficient drainage facilities
under Santa Ana Canyon Road or the Riverside Freeway shall be upgraded by the
developer as required to handlc the ultimate flow.
18. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determtned ta be approprlate by
the Ctty Council~ said fees to be patd at the tlme the building permtt is lssued.
19. That all private streets shall be developed (n accordance wtth the Clty
of Anaheim's standards for private stree[s.
20. That prior to approval of a final tract map or to the tssuance of
build(ng permits, covenants, condittons and restrictlons shall be submltted to and
approved by the City Attorney's Office and, further, that the approved covenants.
-6- PC78-276
i: ;
conditions and restrictions shail be recorded. Sald covenants, condittons and
restrlctions shall include proviston for the permanent maintenance of any common open
space areas.
21, ThaC prior to the introduction of the first ordinance to establlsh
zoning on any parcel(s) within the Bauer Ranch Planned Commuriity, a speciflc Public
Facilities plan, including such tmplementation programs as may be approved by the .
Gity Council, shall be provided by the developer(s) of thc entire Planned Communlty
(I'a ufman and 3road, Inc, or rhe(r successors, assiqns, or transferrees). The
speclfic plan shall include, but not be limited to, a discussion and evaluatlon of
the following:
a. Identification of all the public facilities proposed for the area~
lncluding but not being limiced to pubiic st~eets, landscaped medians
and parkways; publtc parks and open spaces; pollce and fire facilities;
librarles; eouesirian and hiking trails; bicycl~e lanes; electric
utilities such as substations, transmission itnes, and street 11ghting;
and water utiltties such as transmission mains and reservoirs.
b, Ultimate development capacities o` the publtc facilities for th~ area.
c. Land proposed co be dedicated to the City of Anah~im for public
faciltty purposes.
d. Cost to [he City of Anaheim for alt public faclltties.
e. ATignment, phasing and bonding for all rights-of-way for al) arteriat
highways. including equestrlan and hiking tralls and bicycle lanes;
storm dralns; util)ty easements and other public facilities.
f, Specific means of financing the ins[allatlon, conscructton, and
maintenance of all publtc facilities; such means may inclurle 6ut are not
iimited to retmbursemen[ distrlcts, assessment dts[ricts, in lieu fees,
estab115hmenC of a mas[er homeormers associaClon~ etc. provided Yhat
the specific means for each public facilttyshall be approved by the
City of Anahetm.
22. That subject Qroperty shall be developed substantlally in accordance
wi[h the Bauer Ranch Gencral Plan of Devclopment on file with the City of Anah~Tm and
marked Exhibit No. t; provided, however~ [hat the total dreelling uni[ count shall rtot
exceed 900 alchough transfer of units between land use areas may be approved by the
Flanning Camisslon following submittal of precise plans for such transfer. as
discussed in the preceding Condicion 3.
z3. That Condition Nos. i, 4~ 5 and 21, above menttoned~ shail be canplied
with prior to the commencemenc of the activity authorized under thts resolution. or
prior to the Lime that the building permft is issued, or withln a period of one year
f~om date hereof, whichever occurs first. or such further ttme as tha Planning
Commission may grant.
24. That Conditton Nos. 9. 12. 13, 15. 16. 17~ i? and 22, above mentioned,
shall be complied wlth prior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLI~ED that the Anahelm Ctty Planning Commisslon does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution ts expressly predicated upon
applicant's compltance with each and alt of the conditions hr_refnabove set forth.
Should any such conditlon, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
- r Pc7a-z76
i~. ~. .. • ,
~ ~ . . ,~
by the final Judgment of any court of competent Jur~sdiction, then this Resolutlon.
and any approvals herein contatned~ shall be deemcd null and void.
THE fOREG0ING RESOLUTIUti (s signed and approved by me this 4th day of
December, l978. ~
r ~
LfiA MAN, A1 I CIT LANNING COMMISSION
ATTES7:
~ C~RETARY, ANAH M~ LANN N Z`-OMM I~S~M
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I. Edith L. Harris, Secrecary oP the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission~ do
hereby certify tha[ the foregoing resolu[ton was passed and adopCed at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission hcid on Deccnber 4, 1978, a[ 1:30 p.m,, by the
following vote of the members che~eof:
AYES: COMMlS510HER5: BARNES, 6USHOR~, HER~ST* KIt~G, TOIAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: DAViD
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JOHNSON
1978.
IN NITNE55 WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of December~
'~~ ,~ ~,~:,
SECREf~, A~~ HEIM C1~ LAN`! NG COMM SSION
-8- PC78-276