PC 78-28RESOLUTIO!t N0. PC 78'28
A RESOLUTION OF THf. ANAHEIH CITY PLANNi~I~ COFI'~ISSION
THAT PETITIOM FOR 1'AP,IAHCE NO. 2Q66 [~E DENIED
WIIEREl15, thc Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Variance from ATLANTIL RICNfIELD CONPIINY, 178~ West Lincoln Avenue,
Anahelm, California, owner, and GEt~ERAL MPJ NTENANCE, ~NC., 11372 4les[ern Avenue,
5[anton, Caltforni~ 90E20, agent, of ccrtain real nrnperty situated in the Lity of
Anahcim, County of Orange, State of California described as:
THAT PORTIet! OF PARCEI 2, 111 TIIE CITY OF ANAHEIN,, COU-JTY OF
ORANGE, STA7E OF CALIFORt71A, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOY, 30,
PAGE 48 OF PARCEL M/1PS, ON FIIE IN THF OFFIC[ OF THE COUt7TY
RECOP,DEP. OF SAID COU~ITY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BE~!NNINS AT A
POINT Ik TIiE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LtNE OF IyPE?.IAL fIIGHWAY, SAID
POINT REING THE SOUTHERLY TERNINUS OF TtiAT LERTAIN COUP.SE IP7 SAI~
EASTERLY RIfH7 OF WAY LINE SH04lN 0`J SAID MAP AS "NORTF' i° 23' ~~"
EAST 6G4.03 FEET"; THENCE NO4TN 8fi° 37' OC1" ~'EST ALQtIG SAID RIGNT
OF WAY LINE OF IHPERIAL HIfHWAY A DISTANCE OF 2~.00 FEET TO AN
ANGLE ?OINT THEP,EIN; THENCE SDUTN 1° 23' 00" 4'ES7 ALO-I~ SAID
R(6HT OF WAY LIME OF IMPFRIAL HIGf!~~l1Y A DISTA'ILE OF 135•7~ PEET;
THEt~C[ LEA~1II;r, SAID RI;HT OF wAY LIUE OF It1PER1AL HIfHUl1Y S011TH $~
37' 00" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES T~ SAID RI~HT OF uAY LINE A DISTANCE
OF 15~.00 FEFT; THENCE NORT11 1~ 23' 00" EAST PARALLEL WITN SAID
RIC,HT OF WAY LINE OF INPERI.4L NIGHiJAY A DIST~!JC,F OF 136.37 FEET TO
A POIIiT IN TFiE SOUTHERLY RI~HT OF biAY Lit~F OF LA PPL`tA AVEqUE
~0,00 FE[T WIDf, AS SH041t7 OiJ SP.ID N11P. SAID SOllTHFRLY RI;HT OF WAY
LINE AT SAID POINT BEI~IG TNE ARC OF A CU°VE CONCAVE SDUTNE4LY
NAVIN~ A RADIUS OF 1,355•~o FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGN SAID P~IFIT
BEARS NORTH ~ 55'~5" EAST; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHE°LY
RIGiiT OF WAY LINE Of LA PAL~1A AVE!lUE. TNROUGf! A LFNT!t~L ANGLE OF 5n
57~ ~~~~ A!~ A?C D~STA~ICE OF 14n,73 FEFT Tn A POINT It1 SAID EAS7ERLY
RIGHT OF WAY LI~IE 0~ IMPE!'IAL HIGHS~'AY; THE'7CE SOUTt1 1° 23' ~~"
ttEST ALOt~G SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LI!JE OF InPERIAL I~Ir,NNqY A
DISTAHCE OF 14,2t+ FEET TO THE POINT OF EiEGINFtING. TOGETNER WITH
THE SOUTHEP,LY HALF OF LA PAL~1A AVE!dUE ADJOINING SAI~ LAHD ON THE
NORTN, AS SAID AVEtIUE IS DESLRI6ED IN THE DEED TO TNE LITY OF
ANAf1EIM, RECORDED MAY 19, 1970. IN BCOY. 9293, OfFICIAL RECORDS.
EXC[PTIN~ THEREFROM TH~T PQRTION 7HEREOF LONVEYED TO THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA RY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 14, 1952, itl BOOK 2395. PAf,E
522, OfFICIAL RELORDS.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Canmission did hold a public hearing at [he Ci[y
Hall in the City of Anahetm on February 13, 197A, at 1:30 p.m., notice of sald public
hearing having 6een duly given as reauired by lari and in accordance with [he
provislons of the Anahelm Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against sald proposed variance and to investiaate and na~e findings
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WItEREAS. said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due co~sideration of all evidence and repor[s
offered at said hearing, does find anJ determine [he following facts:
PC78-28
.,
I • ~ .
1. That the petitioner proooses a waiver of the folloa~t~y to perntt price
signing on an r.xfsting free-standing pole sign:
(a) SECTION 18.OS.OE9.022 - Maximum size of nrice siqns.
9 s uare feet servlce station price sign permTtted;
20 squa~ proposed)
(b) SECTIONS 16.05.091 and 18.84.062.040 - Free-standinq sians in the SC Zone.
Free-standing signs prohibited; expansion o an exfsting
free-standing sign prooosed)
2. That the a6ove-mentioned waivers are hereby denied on the basis that
the subJect property is located in the Scenic Corridor Zone Overlay and all
adverttsing shall be in accordance with the re~iulations pertainin9 to outdoor
advertising in said zone overlay; that the exlsting free-standing sign was
constructed in connection wtth Variance No. 2307, the conditions of which specified
that said sign would be for identification purposes only without prices; and that
sub.Ject proposal ~vouid be an expansion of an existing nonconforming sign and would
establish an undesirahle precede~t for subsequent similar proposals in the Scenic
Corrtdor.
3. Tha[ there are no exceptional or extraorJinary circumstances or
condi[tons applicable to the oroperty involved or to the in[ended use of the preperty
that do not apply aenerally to the prnperty or class of use in the same vicinity and
zone.
4. That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial praperty right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zonc, and denied to the property in question.
5. That the reouested variance will be naterially detrinental to the
pubiic welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zene
in which the proper[y ts located.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposttion.
ENVIRONMEIJTAL IMPACT FItIDING: The Planntng Director or fiis authorized
representative has determined [hat the prooosed proJec[ falls ~+ithin the def(nition
of Categorical Exempttons, Class it, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the Ci[y of A~aheim
Environmental Imnact Report Gutdelines and ts, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Lity Planning Lommission
does hereby deny subject Petition for Variance on the basis of Che aforementioned
findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 13th day of
February, 1978.
/`~C c' ! ~!/ / C~~l/-2_
CHA RNA~1. ANANEIl~ CiTY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTFST: ~~~ n ~ .
~ ~ Q~Lt..,
SECRETARY, RIUIHEIM CITY PLANNI~IG COMHISSION
-2- PC78-28
~
~..' ' ~ ~
STATE OF CALIFOP.NIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
LITY OF At1AHEIH )
i, Edith L. Harrts, 5ecretary of ihe Anaheim City Planning Commisslon. do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February 13, 1978, at 1:30 P.m., by the
following voie of the members thercof:
AYES: CO'1MIS510P~ER5: BARNES. DAVID, HERBST, JOHNS0~1, KING, LttIN, 70LAR
NOES: LOM`11S510NER5: MONE
ABSENT: CONMISSIONERS: NONE
1978
I1~ WITNESS WHEREOf, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of February~
~~~ ~ liFlct%Ia,.er~
SEC4ETARY, At1AHEIM CITY PLAtINING COMMISSION
-3- PC7A-28