PC 78-287,Y~,,;:
RESOLUTION N0. PC78-237
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSfON
TI1AT PETITIOt~ FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMI? N0. 1918 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commisston did receive a verified
Petition for Canditional Use Pcrmit from PARKS PROPERTIES, INC. 150 East Meda, Sulte
203, Glendora, Californla 90066, owner, and AJF LEASING, 2500 South Eas[ern Avenue,
Los Angcles, Cslifornla 90040, ayent, of certain real property situated In the Ctty
of Anaheim, Lounty of Orange, State of California, described as:
Lots 5, 6, 7 and 18, of Tract No. Sh52, in the Ci[y of Anahcim, as
per map recorJed Fe6ruary il, 1965 in book 211, pages i and 2,
Miscellaneous Maps, in the offtce of the county recorder of said
coun[y.
WHEREAS, the Ctty Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Ctty
Nall in the Clty of Anaheim on December 4, 1978, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly gtven as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1$.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and to investigate and make
findtngs and recommendations in connection [herewith; and
wNEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, inves[igatton and study made
by itself and fn Its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does ftnd and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for wfi(ch a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anahetrn Municipai Code Section 18.G1.050.507 to wft: to
permlt a trailer rcntai and leasing facility Nich a waivcr of:
SECTION 18.61.068.030 - Re uired enciosurc of outdoor uses.
13~ oot h gh b ock. wa I or chainl~nk fence
interwoven with redwood sla[s requlred;
G-foot and 6-foot chainiink fences
fn[erwoven wlth redwood s1aLS and 6-foot
high block wall proposed)
2. That the proposed watver is hereby qranted on the basis that denial
would be depriving subJect property of privileges being enJoyed by other property
owners in the same zone and victnity.
3. That the proposed use will not adversety affect the adJoining land uses
and the grow[h and development of the area in which ic is proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allov the full development ~f the proposed use tn a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general wetfare of the Citizens
of ihe City of Anahelm.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the condittons
imposed, lf any, wi11 no[ be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citlzens of the Ctty of Anaheim,
PC78-287
6. That no one indlcated their presence at said public hearing in
~pposftlon; and that no correspondence was re~eived tn opposition to the subJect
petition.
EtIVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anahelm City Planning Canmission has
reviewed the proposal to ~ermlt a trailer renial and leasing facility wfth a Naiver
af required e~closure of outdoor uses on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land
consisting of approximately 1.9 acres, having a frontage of approximately 111 feet on
the south s(de of Vermont Avenue and a frontage of ?50 fec[ at the westerly terminus
of Lacy Avenue, having a maximum depth of approxfmately 445 fee[ and being located
approxtmately 625 feet west of the centerline of East Street; and does hereby approve
the Negative Declaration from the requiremen[ to prepare an environmental tmpact
report on the basis that there would be no slgnificant indivTdual cr cumulative
adverse environmental impact due to the approval of thls Neoatlve Declaration since
the Anahefn General Plan ~esignates the subJect property for general industriai land
uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are
involved in the proposal; tha[ the Initial Study submi[ted by Cha petitioner
indlcates ~o significant individual or cumulative adverse envirornnental impacts; and
that the Negative Declara[ion subsiantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the
City of Anaheim Planning Depar:ment.
NOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED [hat the Anaheim City Planning Cortmission
d~es hereby grant subject Petition for Co~ditio~al Use Permit, upon the followfna
condltlons which are hereby found [o be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subJect property in order to preserve the safety and generai weifare of the
Citizens of the CI[y of Anahelm:
BE IT FURTHER RESOL`JED that the Anaheim City Planning ~ommission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolutio~ is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compiiance wfth each and all of the condltions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condi[ton, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenferceable
by the final judgmenc of any court of competent jurisdicttori, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contalned, shall be deemed ~ull and void.
THE fOREG0ING RESOLUTION Ts signed and appr ed by me this 4th day of
December, 197$. -
., ' TY L NNING CO'1MISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~-~. ~ ~«,u.~.
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CIT PLANNINu" GOMMISSION
-2- PC78-287
~, ;
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plannfng Carmission, do
hereby certify that Lhe foregoing resolutton was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held o~ December 4. 1978~ at 1:30 p.m.~ by the
follnwing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: LOMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BUSHORE, DAVID. KING. TOLAR
NOES: COMM15510NER5: NONE
ABSENT: CONMISSIONERS: HER85T, JOHN50~~
IN 411TNE55 trHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of December~
~978.
_ ~c a2C-e~. ~ 7~d.t.u.~-
SECRETARY~ ANAHL"IM CIT LANt~ING GOM19 SSION
!.
-3- PC7~-287
i. ;_ _