PC 78-289RESOLUTION N0. PL78-28Q
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANANEIN LITY PLAtl~~ltlr, CO!1tiI5510N
THAT PETITIQN FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1921 BE GRANTE~
WHER.EAS, the Anahcim City Plannina Commission did recelve a verified
Petftion for Candi[lonal Use Permit from IJILLIAM W, LANf,E, 15~6 Wesi Embassy Street.
Anahe(m, California, 928f12, owncr, and CLIFFORD B. LA~~f,E, 1546 West Emba,sy Street,
Anaheim, California 92802, aaent, of certain real property situated tn the Cfty of
Anaheim, County of Orange, Statc of California, descrf6cd as:
TNE SOUTf~ 238.67 FEET, OF THE EAST 124.00 FEET, OF TfiE NEST 566.00
FEET AS NEASUP,E~ ALON, THE SOUTH LIt~E THEREOF, OF THE !IORTHWEST
QUARTER OF TflE NORTf1EA5T QUARTER, OF THE NORTH4lE5T QUARTER OF
SECTION lb, 7041NSHIP 4 SOUTH, RFt~CE 10 NEST, Itl THE RANCHO SAII
JUAN CAJON DE SANTF ANA, CITY OF ANANEIM. COU4TY OF 0.°.AN~E, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOI.'tl ON A HAP RECOROED IN BOOY. 51 PAGE 10 OF
MISCELLIINEOUS MAPS, If~ T11E OfFICE OF THE COU!!TY RECORDER OF SAID
LOUNTY, ALSO BEING A PORTIOtI OF LOT 2 Of HELEt~ AND LYNCHS'
SUBDIVISION AS SH041N 0~1 A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 442 PAGE 159 OF
DEEDS RELORDS OF l05 AN.r,ELES COUNTY~ GALIFORNIA.
LlHEREAS, the City Plinning Commlsston did holQ a oubtic hcartng at the Lity
Hall in the City of Anahein on December 18, 1°7i3, a~t t:3r, p.m „ notice of said public
heartng having been duly 9fven as required by law and tn accordance wtth the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chaoter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and aqainst satd proposed conditional use and to investiaate and make
findings and recommendations in connection there~r(th; and
WNEREAS, said Commission, after due Inspection, invcsttgation arid s[udy made
by itsclf and In its behalf~ and aftcr due considcration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hcaring, does find and determinc the followTng facts:
i. That the proposed use Is properly one for which a conJitional use
permi[ is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Cocle Section 18,61.Q50.070 to wit: to
permit an au[omobile detailing facility.
That the use is grante~ subject to the fallowing conditlons:
(a) That there Nill be no outdoor s[orage of vehicles; and
(b) That all work will be ca~ducted wholly inside the butlding and
[here Hil) be no outdoor work whatsoever; and
(c) That the use Ts granted for a one year perlod of time following
which extensions of time may be gran[ed if it is determined that
thc use has not had a detrimen[al effec[ on the surrounding area
and that there has been no outdoor stora9e of automobiles or any
oucdoor work.
PC78-289
4. That the proposed use wfil not advcrsely affecc the adJoinino land uses
and the growth and developmen[ of the area in wfiich ii is proposed to be located.
5. That thc size and shape of the si[e proposed for the use Is adequate to
aliow thc full developmcnt of the proposed use In a manner no[ detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general weifare of the Citizens
of ihe City of A~aheim,
6. That thc 9ranting of thc Conditional Usc Permit under thc conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to thc peace. health, safety and general
welfare of the Cttizens of the City of Anaheim,
7. ThaL no one indica[ed [hetr presence a[ said oublic hearin9 in
opposition; and that no correspondence was rece(ved in opposi[ion to the subJect
peti[ton,
ENVIROtJMENTAL IMPACT FItiDItJG: That [he Anaheim City Plannina Commisslon has
revlewed the proposal to permit an automobile detailing facility in the ML
(Industrial, limited) Zone on a rectangularly shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 0.6 acrc, having a frontage of approximately 124 fee[ on Lhe south side
of Embassy 5[ree[, having a rt+aximum depth of approxima[ely 205 fcet, and befng
located approximateiy 4h0 feet east of Loara Strect; and does hereby approve [he
t~egative Declaration from the requireneni to orepare an environmental impact report
on the basis that there would be no stgnifican[ individual or cumulative adverse
environmental tmpact due to the approval of this Negative Oeclaration since the
Anahei~ General Plan deslgnates the subJect propcrty for general industrial land uses
commensurate wlth the praposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved
in the proposai; that the Inltial Study subnitted by [he petitfoner indtcates no
significant individual or cumula[ive advr_rse environmental imoacts; and that Lhe
Negativc Declara[i~n substantiat(ng the foregoing findinns ts on file ln the City of
hnaheim Pianning Department.
NOw, TIIEP,EfORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Camission
doas hereby arant subject Peti[ion for Conditlona) Use Permit, upon the following
conditions whfch are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of [he subject property in order to preservc the safety and generai tirelfare of Che
C t t i zens of tlie f, i ty of Anahc im:
i. That the orm er(s) of subJect property shall pay the traffic sianal
assessnent fee (Counci) Poltcy No. 214) dlfference between industrial and commerctal
usc at a ratlo of 5150.00 per 1000 square fcet of buildtng or fraction thereof prior
[o the issuance of a butlding pernit or within a period of sixty (60) days, whichever
occurs first.
2. That [he proposed husiness shai) comply wt[h ali signino requirements
of the ML (lndustrial, llmi:ed) Zone.
3. That subJect property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans a~d specifications on ffle with the City of AnaheTm marked Exhiblt Nos. 1
and 2,
-2- PC78-28g
~.--
~{,,~,,~
4. That there will be no outdoor storage of vehicles and that all work
will be conducted wholly tnside the buildin~ and there will be no outdoor work
whatsoevcr,
5. 7hat the use is aranted for one year and upnn writted request by the
petitioner, time extensions may be granted if it is determined that the use has no[
had a detrimental eFfect on the surrounding area and that there has been no ou[door
storage of vehicles and all work has been conducted wholly (nside the butlding.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLUED that the Anaheim Lity Plann(ng Camission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant'S compliance with each and all af the conditlons herelnabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any oar[ thereof, he declared invalid or unenforceabie
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurtsdictian, then this Resolutian,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
Tt;E FOREr,01~:G RESOLUTIOH is signed and approved by ne this 18th day of
December, 1978.
CN AN, AN GITY PLANNING CONMISSION
ATTEST:
`"1~/~~;:.f~~ ~.1 ~ , :,>; j.-,~~,'
SECRETARY PRO TEMPORE ~
ANAfIElt1 CITY PLA~~NING COMMISSION
STATE OF L/1LIFaRNIA )
COUNTY OF ORAr1GE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
1, Pamela H. Starnes. Secretary Pro Tenpore of [he Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do heroby certify that the foroqoing resolution aas oassed and adopied ai
a meet(ng of the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission held o~ Oecenber 18, 1978. at 1:3D
p.m., by the foilowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BUSHORE, DAVtD. HERBST, KING, JOHNSON
NOES: COMNISSIONERS: NONE
ABSEt1T: COMMISSIONERS: TOLAR
IN 'dITNE55 IJFIEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of December.
1978.
-f~'/l~r~i ~lli ~.~.!~~ ~r~s..^~)
SECRETAR~ PRU TENP RE
ANAHEIri CITY PLANNING COMHISSION
i~~