PC 78-3`` .
RESOLUTIOPI N0. PC78-3
A RESOLUTION OF 7HE ANANEIM CITY PLANNIHG CO"1'11SSION
THAT PETITION fOR C6NDITIONAL USE PEpH17 H0. 179~ BE DEtlIED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Conmission did receive a verified
Petitlon for Conditlonal Use Permit from COLLINS LIMITEO PART~lEP,SHIP, 1077 k'est Ball
Road~ Anaheim, Califor~ia, 928o2. owner, and JUDITN M. HILL, P. 0. Box 3083, Anaheim,
California, 92803~ agent, of certain real property situated in the Lity of Anaheim,
County of Oran9e. State of California, described as:
Beginning at a point on the South line of WesC Broadway which said
point is 40 feet South of a point which is 132•$~ feet East of a
cement monument marking the Northwest corner of Lot 1~7 of "AnaheTm
Extension," as shown on a map of Survey made by William Hamel and
filed for record with the County Recorder of Los Angeles County,
California, said point being the intersection of the South line of
West Broadway with the West line of Adams Street, runntng thence
South 0° 10' 00" West alon9 the 1Jest line of said Adams 5treet and
the Continua[ion thereof 455.75 feet to the South ltne of the
tract of land conveyed to the Anaheim Manufacturing Company by
deed recorded November 12th, 1920 in book 373, pa~e 396 of Dceds;
thence South !38° 57' ~d" wesi along said South line 100.4~ feet to
a point on the East ltne of the right of way of the Los Alamitos
Branch of the Southern Pacific Railway; thence North 0° 0~' 00"
West along said East line 248.~4 feet to a point and continuing
along said right of way line on a curve Northeasterly with a
radlus of ?52.25 feet to an intersection on the South line of said
Broadway Street; thence North 88° 55' 00" Eas[ along said South
line 3~+.44 feet co the poi~t of beginning.
WFIE.°.EP.S. thc C?ty Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hali In the City of Anaheim on January 4. 1978, at 1:30 p.m., noiice of satd public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 16.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and to tnvesttgate and make
findings and recommendattons in connection therewith; and
WNEREAS, said Commission, after due inspectlo~, investigation and study made
offered'atasaidnheari ghadoesafindfand determinedthetfollowing,factsc~ce and reports
1, The proposed use is properly one for which a condiLional use permit is
authorizedby Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.61.050.340 to wit: to permtt a
Ki~gsmen's Orum and Bugle Corps Administrative Office, Activity and Bingo Facility.
2, The proposed use is hereby denied on tha basis that the facility is
located in close proximity to a single-family residentlal area to the west across the
Southern Pacific Railroad tracks and would poten[ially create a noise, parkTng and
traffic lmpact incompatible with said nearby residentlal uses; and that ihe number of
available and proposed on-site parking spaces (81) would be insufficient for the
proposal which would generate the need for approximately 100 spaces.
PC78-3
~~.
~ '
~
3• That the proposed use will adversclY affect the adJoining land uses ~'~d
the growth and development of the area in wfiich it is propased to be located.
4. That the stze and shape of the site proposed far the use Is nat
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Citizens of the Lity of Anaheim,
5• That the grantin9 of the Conditional Use Permit will 6e detrimental to
the peace, health, safety and 9eneral welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That ten (ib) people indicated their presence at saTd public heartn9 1~
oppos(tfon; and that no correspondence was received in opposttton to subje~t
petitio~•
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FItJDING: The Dtrector of thr. Planntng Department has
determined that the proposed activity alls within the definition of Sectton 3•01+
Class ~. ~f the City of Anaheim Guidellnes to the Req~irements for an Environmental
Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an
EIR.
NOW~ TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plannl~g Commission
does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING fIESOLUT10Pl is si9ned and approved by me this 4th day or
January~ 197e•
- `.
:~: ~ ,, f / //- ~~rt_
CHAI MqN, ANANEIM CIT PLAN;~tNG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
,~~r-~ ~ ~l-~~,~..:.
SEC RY, ANqHEIM LITY PLANN~MG COMMISSION
5TATE OF CAIIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY Of ANAHEIM )
1, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the l+~ahelm Clty PlannTna Comnission. ~a
hureby ~ertify that the foregoing resolutton was passed and adopted at a meettng of
the AnaheTm City Planning Cormnisslon held o~ January 4~ 1978, a t 1:30 p.m.. b~• the
followin9 vote of the members thereof;
AYES: COMHISSIONERS: EARNES. OAVID, HERBST, JOHNSON~ KING, TOLAR
NOES: ~OtiMISS10NER5: NONE
ABSENT: COMNISSIONEP,S: LINN
1978.
IH WITNE55 WFIEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day uf January.
, ~r,G ?~ ~a.r.~,;..
SECRETARY. ANAHEIM CITY PlAN41NG COMM ~~
-2- PC78-3