PC 78-4RESOLUTION N0. PC78-4
A RESOLUTION OF THE A:dAHE1M CITY PIANNING COKMISSION
THAT PETITt0~1 FOR LOND1T101~AL USE PERMIT ~10. 17~1 BE DENIED
41HEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commfssion did receive a verified
Peti[ion for Conditional Use Permit from RtSSTIG MOTEL, ~i1F South Beach Boulevard,
Anaheim, California, 92804, owner, of certain real nroperty situated in the Ctty of
Anaheim, County of ~ran~e, State of California, describr_d as:
The south 94.00 feet of thc north 329.52 feet ot the west 464.20
feet, measured along the south linc, of the south half of the
southwest quarter of the southwesi quartr_r of Sectton 13, Township
4 South, Ranae il West, in the Rancho Los Coyo[es, in the Lity of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Caiifornia, as per map
recorded in Book 51. Page Ii of Miscellaneous Mans, in the office
of the County Recorder of said County. EXCEPT the west 92.00 feet
thereof. The east i-+2.00 feet of [he west 464.20 feet, measured
along thc south line, of the south half of the southwest quarter
of the southwest quarter of Section 13, township 4 South, Range 11
West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, Lity of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in book. 51, page
1T of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of
said county. EXCEPT the north 329.>2 feet thereof. AL50 EXCEPT
the south 235.52 feet thereof.
WFIEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on January 4, 197II, a[ 1:30 P•m., notice of said public
hearing having 6een duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Hunicipal Code, Chapter 18.03~ to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and to inves[igate and make
finc:inys and recortimendastons in connection [herewith; and
WHEREAS~ satd Commtssion, after due inspec[ton, inve:stigatlon and study made
by ttself and in its behalf, and after due consideratton of all evidence and reports
offered at safd hearing, does flnd and determine the follor:tng facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by An~heim Municipal Code Section 18.hG.O50.tpp to wtt: to
permit a recreational vehicle facility Tn conJunction wtth an er.isting motel.
2. That the proposed use Ts hereby denied o~ the basis that the size of
subJec[ propert; does no[ permit adequate on-site vehicular circulation and turning
space for large recreational vehicles, and that the proposal will have a potential
adversA impact on nearby residential uses hecause of the increased trafftc and noise,
3. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjointng land uses and
the growth and development of the area in which tt is proposed to be located.
4, That the stze and shape of the site proposed for the u:;e is not
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
de[rtmental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety. and generai
welfare of the Ci[izens of the Clty of Anaheim.
PC78-4
5. That thc granting of the Conditional Use Permit will be detrimentel [o
the peace, health, safety and general welfare ofi thc Cittzens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That two persons Indicated their presence at said public hearing In
opposition, and a petition was presented containing signatures of 30 persons in
opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anahetm City Planning Commlssion has
reviewed subject proposal to permit a recreational vehicle facility in conJunctlon
with an extstiny motel on an irregular)y-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 1.1 acres havin9 ~ frontage of approximately 4h feet on the east side
of Beach Boulevard, having a maximum depth of approximately 375 feet. being located
approximately 338 feet north of thc centerline of Ball Road~ and does hereby approve
[he ~7egative Deciaration from the requirement to prepare an Pnvir~nmentai impact
report on the basts that there rrould be no significant indTvtdual or cumulative
adverse environmental impact due to the approval of Chis Negative Declaration since
the Anaheim General Plan designates ihe suhJect property for general cor,mercTal and
medfum-density residential land uses commensurate wtth the proposal; that no
sensi[ive environmental impac[s are involved in the proposal; that the Initia) Study
submitted by the petitioner indicates no signiftcant individual or cumulattve adverse
environmenial impacts; and that the Negative Declaratton substantiating the foregoing
findin9s is on file in tnc :ity of Anaheim Planning Depar:ment.
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED [ha[ thc Anahetm City Planning Commission
does hereby deny subJect Petition for Conditional Use Permi[ on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOP,EGOING RESOLUTION is ~igned and approved by me this 4th day of
January, 1478.
/,~~.~~1% ~'c-~--
CHAIRMAti, At~AHE1M L17Y PLANHING CO`1MISSION
ATTEST:
i
, ~.c_~~ . ~ ?~h.t.L.:.----
SELRETAR`~, ANkHEIM GtTY PLANNING COHMi5510~1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUhiTY OF ORAq6E ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. HarrTs, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Carentssion, do
hereby certify that the fore9otng resolution was passed and adopted at a meetTng of
the Anaheim City Planning Canmisslon held on January 4, 1978, at 1:30 p.m „ by the
following vote of thc members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSiO~lERS: BARNES. HERBST, JOhiNSON~ KING, TOLAR
NOES: COMHiS510NERS: DAVID
AUSENT: COf1f115S10NER5: LINII
t978.
IM WITNESS k'HEREOf. I havc hereunto set my hand tfiis hth day of January.
~
~
-2- PC78-~