PC 78-48RESOLUTION N0. PC78-48
A RESOLUTIOt~ OF TNE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIt~G CO`1NISSION
TNAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ND. 1806 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Cortmisslon did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from DOROTHY SABEL, NILLIAH A., GLORIA M. AND
GOLDIE BAYZERMAN, 6980 Knott Street, Buena Park, Lalifornia 90621, owners, and MARVIN
H. GP.EENSPAN, 2002 Victoria Avenue, Anaheim, Catifornia 92804, agent, of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as:
PARCEL 1: The North 135 feet of the South 330 feet of the West
half of Lot 5 of Nelen and Lynch's Subdiviston, as shown on a map
recorded in Book ~t~~2, page 158. Deeds, records of Los Angeles
County, California.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission dfd hold a public hearing at the City
Hatt in the City of Anaheim on March 13. 1978. at 1:30 p.m., notice of said pub~ic
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.Q3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in co~nection ther2with; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideratlon of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. Tha[ [he proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.44.05~•040 to wit: to
permit a massage parlor.
2. That the proposed use, wheretn employment is limited to persons
eighteen years or older, will adversely affect the adjoining and nearby land uses
which constst of a church, school. a city park and numerous famfly-type restaurants,
and will also adversely affect the arowth and devefopment of the area in whtch lt is
proposed to be located.
3• That there are a sufficient number of similar es[ablishments tn close
proximity to subject location to serve the needs of the community and the granting of
the Conditlonal Use Permit will be detrinental to the peace, health, safety and
general ~relfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
4. That l3 persons indicated thrir presence at said public hearing in
oppositlon; and that correspondence was receive~ in oppositlon to the subject
petition; and a petition containing app~oxtmately 85 signatures was recetved in
opposition,
ENVIRONMEN7AL IMPACT FiNDING: The Planning Director or hts authorized
representative has determined that the proposed proJect falls within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Classes 1 and 3, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the City of
Anaheim Environmental impact Report Guldelines and is. therefore, categorically
exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
PC78-~8
~ .
~
~ ' ! % ,t
NOW~ TIiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planntng Commission
does hereby deny subJect Peti[fon for Condi[io~al Use Permit on the basts of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 13th day of
March. 1978.
~~~~~;~-
CI1A RMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~ ~ /~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C0~4MISS~ON
STATE OF CAIIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
i, Ed1th L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on March 13, ig78~ at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: CONMIS510ltER5: BARNES, DAVID, HERBST, ~ING~ LIPlN, TOLAR
NOES: CQMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JOHNSON
IN WITNE55 WNEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of March,
1978.
`~ ~. .~° ~.~..~:~
SECRETA.°.Y. A!lAHEIH CIT P~A`I`liHG CO`1`1155lOF!
~ -2- PC78-4$