PC 78-51RESOLUTION H0. PC7&-51
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RELLASSIFILATION l;0. 77-78-41 BE GRANTED.
WiiEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from JERAL AND DORTHEAL STANLEY, MICHAEL AND LINDA
GOEHRING, 271~ Nildwood ~ourx, Ful)erton. California 92631, owner, and KINETIC DESIGN
METHODS, P. 0. Box 907, Orange, California 92666, agent, of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
follows:
The West 67 feet of the EasC 460 feet of the North one-half of the
Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast
quarter of Section 2, in Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the
Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, in the city of Santa Ana, as
per book 51, page 10, Miscellar.~ous Maos; and
The West 66.5 feet of the East 393 feet of the North half of the
Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the 5outheast
quarter of Section 2 Township 4 South, Range 10 Nest, in the
Rancho San Juan CaJon de Santa Ana, City of Anahelm~ as per map
recorded in book 51, Page 10, Miscellaneous Maps. In the office of
the county recorder of said county.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hoid a public h~aring at [he Ctty
Hall in [he City of Anaheim on March 27, i9J8~ at i:30 p.m., nottce of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anahefm Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and a9ainst said proposed reclassiffcation and to investigate and make
findings and recomnendations in connec[fon therewlth; and
WHEREAS, said Commfssion, aTter due (rtspection, investiaation and study made
by itseif and in i[s behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered a[ said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
t, That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from
the RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultu~-al) Zone to the RM-1200 (Resident~at,
Multiple-Family) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subJect property for medium
density residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassificatfon fs hereby granted subJect to the
st(pulations of the petitioner that an adequate turn-around area shall be provided
for the trash trucks on subJect property and thac any modifications to the pians as
presented to the Planning Cortanission shall be revterrad by the Planning Oepartment
staff to determinc whether or not satd revised plans conform ta the intent of the
Planning Commission.
4. That [hc proposed reciassification of subJect property is necessary
and/or desirable for Lhe orderiy and proper development of the community.
PC78-51
5. That the proposed rectassification of subjec[ proncrty does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity
to subject pro~erty and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
6. That the proposed reclassification of subJect property requirr_s the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in trafffc which will be
generated by the intensification of iand use.
7, That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence ~•~?S received 1n opposition to the subJect
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Lity Planning Commission has
revlewed the subject proposal to reclassify the zonin9 from RS-A-43,000
(RESIDEHTIAL/AGRI~ULTURAL) Zone to the RM-1200 (RESIDEFITIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) 7.one on
a rectan9ularly shaped parcel of land consisting of 0.9 acre , having a frontage of
approximately 133 feet on the south side of Ranneya Drive, having a maximum depth of
approximately 298 feet , being located approximately 327 fect w~st of the cen[erline
of State College Boulevard, and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration report
on the basis that there would be no significan[ indlvidual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the
Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for medfu•n-uensity residential
land uses cortmensurate with the proposal; ihat no sensitive environmental impatts are
involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the P.tittoner
indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmen[al impacts; and
that the Negative Declaration substantiating tfie foregoing findings is on f11e in [he
City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Lity Planning Comnission
does hereby grant subject Petltlon for Reclassiftcation and, by so doin9, that Titte
18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from the RS-A-43,000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRfCULTURAL} 20NE and [o incorporatie Sald
descrfbed property into the RM-1200 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY} ZONE upon the
following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of subject property in order to pr~serve the safety and general welfare
of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subJecx property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of Iand 32 feet in width from the centerline of the s[reet along Romneya
Drive far street widening purposes.
2. That all engineerln9 requirements of the City of Anahetm alon9 Romneya
Drive including preparation of improvement plans and tnstallation of all imRrovements
such as curbs and gutiers, sidewalks, street grading and pavin9, drainage factlitTes
or other appurtenant work, shall be complied wich as required by the City Engineer
and i~ accordance wf[h standard plans and specifications on ftle in the Office of the
City En9ineer; that street lighting facllities along Romneya Drive shatl be installed
prior to final builfng inspection unless otherwise approved by the Dtrector of Public
Utiltties, and in accordance with standard specifications on file in the Office of
the Director of Public Utilittes; and/or that a bond, certtficate of deposit, letter
of credtt, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall
be posted wlth the City to guarantee Yhe installation of the above-menttoned
requirements prior to final occupancy.
-2- Pt78-5~
• i
3, That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of 60 cents per front foot along Romneya Urive for tree planting purposes.
4. That trash scorage areas with an adequate on-site vehicle turn-around
area shal! be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the Office of
the Director of Public Works.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of tF~e Fire Department prior to commencement
of structural framing.
6. That subiect oroaerty shall be served by u~derground utilittes.
7. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory [o the City Engineer.
8. That the owner of subject property shall pay to [he City of Anaheim
park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the Ci[y Council,
said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is Tssued.
9. That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Director of
Public Utilities shall be paid to the Lity of Anaheim prior to the issuance of a
buflding permit.
10. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subJect property,
Condition Nos. t, 2 and 3, above-menttoned, shall be completed. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void hv action of the
Planning Commission u^.less said conditions are complied with within one year from the
date hereof, or such further time as the Planning Lommission may 9rant.
ii. That Condition Nos. 4, 6 and 7, above-mentioned, shall be complled with
prior to ffnal building and zoning inspections.
12. That subject oroperty shail be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specificatlons on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibits 1
through 6, and tha[ any modlfications to said plans shalt be reviewed by the Planntng
Department staff to determine whether or not they are in accordance with Planning
Commission in[ention.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 27th day of
March, 5978.
CHAIR H, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~OMMISSIOt.
ATTEST:
-~~ .~ ~,~.:,
SECRETARY. ANAHElM CITY LA~ NNING COMMISSION
-3- pc78-5ti
~ i
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I. Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planni~g Commission~ do
hereby certlfy that the fureyoiny resolutlon was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Aneheim City Planning Commission held on March 27, 1978, at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vo;e of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIUNERS: BARNES, DAUID~ HERBST, JOHNSON~ KING, TOLAR
NOES: COMMlSSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COHMISSIONERS: LINN
1978.
It~ WITNE55 WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of March,
G~r.~ .~ Afa.vi..;..-
SECREThRY, ANAHEIM CITY PL.ANNING COMHISSION
_y_ pc7a-5~