Loading...
PC 78-56RESOLUTION N0. PC78-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING LOMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 77-78~53 BE GRANTED. WHEREAS, thc Anahelm City Planning Commisston did receive a verified petition for Reclassif~ ~tion from E. 0. RODEFFER, 1720 East Garry Street, Suite 106, Santa Ana, California 92705, owner, and HARRY C. SCHREY, 1720 East Garry Street. Suite 106, Santa Ana, California 92705, agent, of cerCafn real property sttuated in the Ctty of Anaheim, County of Orange. State of Californla, described as follows: That portion of the Nest half of of the Northeast quarter of Section 1, Township 4 South. Range 11 West, in Rancho Los Coyotes, in the Lity of Anaheim, acquired by the Sta[e of Californla, by Parcel i of Deed 1281, recorded in book 3875, page 95 of Officlal Records Tn the office of the County Recorder of said Gounty, bounded Southerly and Southeasterly by the following described line: Beginning at thc Southerly terminus of ihat ceriain course having a bearing and dtstance of South 0° 36' S0" East, 80.05 fect, as shown in the Easterly line of Parcel 1 of a map recorded on May 19, i°70 in Statc Highway Map Book No. 7, Pages 37 to 39 inclusive~ Records of Orange County; thence North 89° 23' 10" East, 37.85 feet; thence North 64° 36' 21" East, 198.8? feet to the Southwesterly llne of that certain parcel of land acquired by the State of Cal(fornta by Deed 1277, recorded in book 3571, page 398 of said Official Records; and bounded Westerly by said Easterly line of Parcel 1 of said map and the Nor[herly prolongation thereof. 1JHEREAS. the City Planning Lommisston d{d hold a publtc hearing at Che City Hatl in the City of Anahetn on March 27, 1978, aL 1:30 p.m „ notict of said pub)lc hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Munfcipal Cade. Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassificatlon and to investigate and make findings and recommendatlons in connectfon therewith; and ~HEREAS, said Commission, aftcr due inspection, investigatton and study made by itself and in its behatf~ and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and detarmine the following facts: 1. That the petitioner proposes reclass'fication of subJect property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultur~l) and ML (Industrial~ Limited) Zones to the ML (Industrial, Limited) Zone. 2. That the Anahelm General Plan designates subJect property for general Industrial use. 3. That the proposed reclasslfication of subJect property ts necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper devetopment of the community. PC78-56 4. That the proposed reclassification of subject proper[y doe~ properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community. 5. That no one indlcated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subJect petition. ENVIROt~ME~J7AL IMPACT FINDING: Tha[ the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the subject proposa to reclassify the zoning from the R5-A-43.000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) and ML (itIDUSTRIAL, IIMITED) zones to the ML (I4DUSTRIAL, LIMITEO) zone to permit a racquetball facility on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 0.6 acres, having a frontage of approximately 228 feet on the east side of Dale Avenue. having a maxtmum depth of 262 feet, and being located approximately 645 feet south of the cen[erline of Orangethorpe Avenue; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration report o~ the basis that there would be no significant individual or cumulattve adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaratfon since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for general industrlal land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are invotved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the Petitioner indicates no signtficant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and tha[ the Ne9ative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subJect Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described property from the RS-A-43,000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) and ML (INDUSTRIAL, LIMITED) ZONES and to incorpora[e said described property into the ML (INDUSTRIAL, IIMITEO) ZONE upon the following conditions which are hereby found [a be a netessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subJect property in order to preserve [he safety and general welfare of the Litlzens of the City of Anaheim: t. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans ~n file with the OTfice of the Dlrector of Public Works. 2. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Ftre Department prlor [o commencement of structural framing. 3. That subject property shall be served by underground utilitles. 4. That drainage of subJect property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engi~eer. 5, That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Director of Public UtilTties shall be pald to the City of Anahetm prlor to the issuance of a building permlt. -2- PC7B-55 6. That ConditTon Nos. 1, 3 and 4~ above-mentioned, shall be canplied with prtor to finai building and zoning inspections. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is slgned and approved by me this 27th day of March, 1978. / //~~~ - LNAI AN~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: ~~ d - L~~'l.tii.~.~- SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIhG COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) i, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Ptanning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolutlon was passed and adopted at a meettng of the Anaheim City Planning Canmission hetd on March 27~ 1478. at 1:30 p.m,~ by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: LOMMISSIONERS:• BARNES. DAVID, HERBST, JOHNSON, KIMG~ TOLAR NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LINN 1978. IN WITNESS 1dHEREOF~ I havc hereunto set my hand this 27th day of March~ ~,~~ ,r.° ii~~~ SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING LOyM15510N -3- Q*-7g-56