PC 78-60~
R[SOLUTIOFI N0. PC78-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE AFJANEIM CITY PLANNING COHNISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIO~~AL USE PERMIT N0, 1£i08 SE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from JONN R. T041NSEND, 83to Cerri[os Avenue~
Stanton, California, 90680, owner, and itI~LPN BELLAIS, 13282 Wilson Street. Garden
Grove, California 92644, a9ent, of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
THE WEST 170.00 FEET OF THE NORTH i71.00 FEET Of THE NORTHWEST
QUARTEP, OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, Rl1DlGE il WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS
COYOTES, LITY OF A~~AHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51 PAGE 11 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN
THE OFFfCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUPiTY. EXCEPT ALL
MINERALS, GAS, OILS, PETROLEUM, NAPTHA AND OTl1EP, HYDROCARBON
SUBSTAtlLES, BELOW A OEPTH OF 100 FEET, BUT WITHOUT THE RIGHT Of
SURFACE ENTRY ON SA10 LAND, AS RESERVED IPI THE DEED FROM SfiELL Oll
COMPAtJY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 1?75 ~N
BOOK 11609 PAGE b96, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on March 27, 1978, at 1:30 p.m., notice of sai~+ public
hearing havin9 been duly 91ven as required by law and in accord:3nce with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03. to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use an~ to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewi[h; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after dus inspectton, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidr~.,ce and reports
offered at said hearing, does fin~ and determine [he followtng facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anahelm Municipal Code Section 18.03.030.010 to wit: to
permit an automotive repair facitity.
2, Tha[ the proposed use Is hereby 9ranted for a two-year period subject
to review for possible extensions of time by the Planning Cortmission to determine
whether or not the use has been detrimental to the area and subJect to the following
stipulations by the petitioner: 1) That all work shall be conducted wholly inside
the buitding; 2) That the hours of operattons shall be from 8:00 a.m, to 5:30 p.m. -
Monday through Saturday; and 3j That trees shall be planted in all existing tree
wells and shall be properly maintained.
3. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adJoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area in which ii is proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimentai to the
particular area nor to [he peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
NC78-6o
;
,~
A
5, That the granting of the Conditional Usc Permit under thand~ngene~al
imposed, if any, will no[ be detrimental to the peace, health, safety
welfare of the Citizens of the Ctty of Anaheim.
6. That no one indtcated [heir presencc at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subJect
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planning Director or hls authorized
representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition
of Lategorical Exemptions. Ciass i, as defined in Parayraph 2 of the C1ty of Anaheim
Environmental Impact Report Guidelines and is, therefore, iategorically exempC from
the requirement to prepare an E~R.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED tha[ the Anaheim City Planning Lommission
does hereby grant subJect Petltion for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property 1n order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1, That street lighting facilities along Western Avenue and Ball Road
shall be installed unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Utilities, and
in accordance with sta~dard speciftcations on file in the Office of the Director of
Public Utilities; or that a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or cash~
in an amount and form satisfactory to the Lity of Anaheim shall be posted with the
City to guarantee the installation of the above-me~tioned requirements.
2. That [he owners of subject property submit a letter requesting
termination of Variance No. 2736.
3, That subject property shaii be developed subs[antiallY in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
and 2 provided, however, tha[ trees shali be plant~d in che existing tree wells and
shall be properly maintained.
4. That Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3, ebove-mentioned, shall be complied with
within a period of sixty (60) days from the date hereof.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 27th day of
March, 1978•
-9 -
CHAI 1AN~ ANAHEI LITY PLANNING LQMMISSION
ATTEST:
/a ~,l~ .Z /~~.t.v%
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIDN
-2- PC78-60
\ _ .
.
• f
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahelm Clty Planning Commlssion, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Cortmission held on March 27, 1978, at 1:30 p.m.~ by the
foilowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, DAVID, FIERBST, JOHNSON, KING, LINN, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LINN
IN WITNE55 NFiEREOF~ t have hereunto set my hand Lhis 27th day of March,
1978.
~~~L s4 ~~,
SELPETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM SSION
-~- PC78-60