PC 78-68~
ftESOLUTION N0. PC78-68
A RESOLUTIOh OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNINC COMNISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITlONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1812 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verifled
Fetition for Conditional Use Permit from DAVID OOERING~ 416 South Primrose, Anahelm,
California, 92804, owner, and DONALD L. SHAFER, 1203 West Lincoln Avenue, Anahelm,
California 92805~ agen[, of certain real property situated in the City uf Anaheim,
Counr~ of Orange„ SCaLe of California, described as:
Lots 12 thru 15 and 21 thru 23 in Block 3 of Su.mmerfleld and
Oppenheimer's subdivislon ln the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, 5[ate of Ca7lfornia, as pcr map thereof recorded in Book
19, Pa9e 44 of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County,
California.
WHEREAS, ihe Clty Planning Commission dtd hold a public hearing at the City
Hall tn the City of Anahelia on April 10, 1978, at 1:30 p.m „ notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance wi[h the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, ;o hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use and to investigate and make
find?ngs and recommendations in connectton therewith; and
NHERE~S, sald Canmission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by (tself and in its behalf, and afEer due considera[ion of all e~~idence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determinm the following facts:
i. That Lhe proposed use is aroperiy one for which a condiCionai use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sectio~ 18.03.030.010 and
18.45.050.010 to wit: to expand an existing cocktail lounge and dance hall.
2, That the proposed use is hereby granted for a one year time period to
be revTewed by the Pianning Ca.nmtssion for possibic exiensions of tim~ to determtne
whether or not the use has had a detr(mental effect on thc nearby residentiat uses
and to determine whether or not there have been any parking problems generated by the
proposal.
3. That the proposed use wtll not adversely affect thc adJoining land uses
and ehe growth and developmeni of the area in which it is proposed to be located
because the expansion area is located within the existing building.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use i~ a manner noY detrimantal to the
particular area nor to the peace, heal[h, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the Lity of Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Co~dtttonal Usc Permit under the conditions
imposed~ (f any, will nat be detrimental to the peace. health. safety and general
welfare of the Cltlzens of the Clty of Anahe(m.
PC78-68
~, i
6. That one person indicated their presence at said public heartng in
oppositlon; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subJect
petition.
ENNIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planning Director or his authortzed
representative has determined that the proposed project falls wlthtn the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the Ctty of Anahelm
Environmental impact Renort Guidelines and is, therefore, categortcally exempt from
the requlrement to prepare an EIR.
NOW~ THER'eFORE, BE IT RESaLVED that the ~nahPim Ctty Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Pet(tton for Conditional Use Permit, upon the followfng
condltions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subJect proFerty in order to preserve the safety a~d general welfare of ;he
Cittzens of Che Clty of Anaheim:
1. That street ligh[ing facili[ies along Diamond Street shall be instalied
prior to finai building and zonir~g inspections unless otherwise approved by the
Director of Publlc Utilitles, and i~ accordance with standard specifications on file
in the Office of the Director of Public Utilities; and/or that a bond, certiflcate of
deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the Gity of
Anaheim shiall be posted with the City to guarantee the Installatlon of the above-
mentioned requirements.
7.. That the owner(s) of subject proparty shall pay to the Ctty of Anaheim
the sum of $3.50 per front foot along lincoln Avenue and Carleton Avenue for street
lighting purposes.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accardance with approved
plans on file wi[h the Office of the Dtrector of Pubiic 1lorks.
4. That subJect proper2y shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and spectficattons on file with the City of Anahelm marked E:chibfi Nos. 1
~nd 2.
5. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be complied wtth
prior to the commencement of the actfvit~ authortzed under this resolution, or prior
to the time that the bullding permit is issued, or wtthin a period of one year from
date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further ttme as tha Planning Commission
may grant.
6, That Condition Nos. 3 and 4. above-mentioned, shali be canplled with
prior to final butlding and zoning inspections.
7. That this co~ditlonal use permit is granted for a one-year time period,
subJect to review and consideration for pussible extensions of time by the Planning
Commission upon written request by the petliioner.
-2- PC78-68
.
. +,.~
THE FOREGOINf, RESOLUTION is sig~ed and approved by me this tOth day of
April, i97a•
~a~~~-~ ~,~
IRMA~1, ANAHEIM CI PLANNING LOMMISSION
ATfEST:
~~ ~ ~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PIANNING COMMISSION
5?ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIH )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the A~aheim City Planning Comm(ssion, do
hereby cer[ify that the foregoi~g resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning ~ommission he.ld on April 10, 1~78, at 1:30 p.m., by the
followtng vote of the members thereof:
AYES: LOt1MISSI0NER5: BARNES, DAVID, HERBST, LINN, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: JOHI~SON, KING
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NOfiE
t978.
IN WITNESS WNEREOF, I have hereur~to set my hand this 10th day of April,
~~ ~ ~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
^3- Pt78-b8