PC 78-7RESOLUTION ?~0. PC78-7
A RESOLUTION OF TNE ANAHEIN LITY PL~NNING COMMISSIOPI
THAT PETITIO~i FOR COtlDITIONAL USE PERNIT N0. 179~+ 4E GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Lity Planning Commission did receive a vertfled
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from ALLEN A. AND HILDA J. HEtIDRY, 336t East
Niraloma Avenue, Anaheim, California, ~12806, ovmerc, and ELHEP, D. RAE, 430 East Hain
Strcet, Tustin, California ?2680, a9ent, of certain real proF 'y situated in Yhe
City of Anahelm, Lounty of Orange, State of California, described as:
The West 165 feet of the East 33~ feet of thc West 660 fee[ of
that portion of Lot Two (2) in Block "E" of the Kraemer Tract, as
per map thereof recorded in Book 12. at Pages 87 and 88 of
Misceilaneous Records of Los Angeles Loun[y, California, described
as fotlor~s: Beginning a[ a point in the Easterly line of sald
Lo[, 28 chains Southerly from the Northeasterly corner of said
lot; thence Southerly along said Easterly line 12.03 chains to the
Southeas[erty corr~r of said lot; thence Westerly along the
Southerly line ~~f said lot, 20 chains to the .iouthwesterly corner
of said lot; thence Northerly along the Wes[erly line of said lot,
12.03 ~hains to Lhe Southwes[erly corner line of [he tract of lanci
described in the dced from Hattie Goetz and hcr husband to Emma
Shaffer, recorded December 6, 1917, in Book 31F, at Page 202, of
Deeds, records of said Orange County; thence Easterly alon9 the
Sou[herly line of said tract 20 chains [o the poin[ of beginninn.
EXCEPTIN(; therefrom the Northeriy 2 acres of the above described
real property.
WHEREAS, the City Pianning Commisslon did hold a public hearing a[ the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim or January 4, 1978, at 1:30 P•m „ notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim t4unicipal Code, Chapter t°.0; to hear and consider
evidence for and agalnst said proposed conditio~al use and to lnvestigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection eherewith; a~d
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideratfon of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
~, That the proposed us~ is properly one for which a conditional use
permii is authorizeJ by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.61.050.501 to wit: to
permit a contractor's storage yard with waivers of:
(a) SELT!0~! 13,51.063.~11 - Minfmum front setback.
50 eet rom an arterial highway
required; 3~ feet existing,)
(b) SECTIOl~ 18,61.068.03~ ~ Reauired enclosure of outdoor uses.
Chain-link ence with interwoven wooden
siats and tree screen required; wood
cedar e~ce proposed.)
PC78-7
2. That the proposed use is hereby granted for a fence contractor's
storage yard on the basis of petitioner's stipulations that only banded lumber, wood
fencin9, and rolled chainlfnk fencing ~~ill be stored outdoors on subject property,
and that satd materials shall be stacked no higher [han the enciosure fencing, as
required by [he Zoning Code.
3. That the above-mentioned waiver (a) is hereby granted on tfie basis Lhat
the structure is existing and that tt would create a hardship to relocate it.
4. That tfie above-mentioned waiver (b) is hereby granted on the basis that
the proposed fencing material consisting of 6-foot hlgh 5/8" x 8" cedar boards and 4"
x 4" redwood pests along the east and south property perimeters will be a more
effective enclosure material than the chainlink fencing entirely interwoven with
redwood or cedar slats as spec(fied by the Zoning Code.
5. That the proposed use wfll not adverscly affect the adjoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area in which it 1s proposed to be located.
6. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow [he full development of the proposed use in a manner not de[rimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
7. 7hat the granting of the Londitional Use Per•mit under the conditions
imposed, if any, wlll not be detrimental [o the peace, health, safety an<! general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anahelm,
8. That one person indicated his presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition Lo the subject
petitlon.
ENVIROPlMENTAL IHPACT F14DIN6: The Director of the Planning Department has
determined that the proposed activity alis within the defi~ition of Section 3.01,
Classes t and 5, of the City of Anaheim Cuidelines to the Requirements for an
Environmental Impace Report and fs, Ctierefore~ categoricaily exempt from [he
requ(rement to file an EIR.
tJOW, THEftEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Pe[ition for Condltional Use Permit, upon the foilowing
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequfsite to the proposed use
of the subJect property tn order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Cittzens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subJect property shall deed to the City of Anahelm
a strip of land 45 feet in width from the centerline of the street atong Miraloma
Avenue for street widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Miraloma
Avenue, including preparation of improvement plans and ins[allation of all
improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving,
drainage facilities or other appurtenant work~ shall be complied wiih as required by
the City Englneer and in accordance with standard plans and specificatTons on file in
the office of the City Engineer; that street llghting facilities along Aliraloma
Avenue shall 6e installed as requtred by the Director of Public Utilittes, and in
accordance with standard specifications on file in the office of the Director of
-2- PC78-7
Public Utilitias; and/or that a bond, c~rtificate of deposit, letter of credi[, or
cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anahelm shall be posted wtth
the Clty to guarantee the in~tallation of the above-mentioned requirements.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the office of the Director of Public ~Jorks.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged, as required and
determined to be necessary bY the Chief of the Fire Department, prior to commencement
of structural framing.
5. That subject property shall be served by underground utiltties.
6. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the Ci[y Engtneer.
7. That the owner(S) of subject property shait pay appropriate drainage
assessment fees to the City of Anaheim as detcrmfned by the City Engineer prior to
comnencement of subJect activity,
8. That the existing structure sha11 be brought up to the mintmum
standards of the City of Anaheim, including the Unifcrm Bullding, Plumbing~
Electrical. Housing, Mechanicat and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheim,
9. That appropriate water assessmen[ fees, as determincd by the Director
of Public Utilities, shall be paid to the City of Anaheim p~j~~ to ihe issuance of a
building permit.
10. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subJect to the completion
of Reclassification No. 61-62-69, now pending.
11. Tha[ subject Property shai) be developed substantlally in accordance
with plans and specifications on file kith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibtt No. 1,
12. That fondition Nos. 1, 2 anC i~, ibove me~tfored. shall be tomplEed
with prior to the commenceJnent of the activity authorfzed under [hts resolution, or
prior to the time that the building permit is issued, or withtn a period of one year
from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further ttme as the Planning
Commisslon may grant.
13. That Condition Nos. 3, 5~ 6~ 8 and 11, above mentloned, shall be
compticd with prior to final building and zoning inspections,
14. That only bande~ lumber, wood fencing, and roiled chatnlink fencing
shali be stored outdoors on subject property, and thai said materials shall be
stacked no higher than the enclosure fencing.
TtIE FORE~OItIG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 4th day of
January, 1978,
/ /, ' ~~//,
,r ~~; , =~~/": `=.,, f ~'~~~z_
CHAIKMAN. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COM~IISSION
ATTEST:
`%,o ,-~ .!, ~
S-E~tC'E~tAR ~ E M ~1H~N 15S10li PC78~7
-3 -
( ' ..~
S7ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the qnaheim City Planning Commission heid on January y~ 197g~ at 1:30 p.m „ by the
foltowing votc of the members thereof:
AYES; COM415510NER5: DAVID, HERBST, KING. LINN,
NOES; COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, JOHNSON, TOLAR
ABSENT: COMMISSIOP~ERS: NOkE
1478.
IN WITNESS NHEREOF~ 1 have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of January,
~~.~.. ,~~,, ~ ,- .
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNI!!G COMMISSION
-~- PC78-7